2015 promises an Obama effort to supercede American jurisprudence in a cooperative effort advancing wealth redistribution on an international scale.

59 share

40 share shows excellent

reader interes

The Kyoto Treaty officially collapsed in 2009,  when a conference of Utopian World Leaders  (including Obama), gathered in Geneva, but left without accomplishing anything of merit.  Now,  five years later,  we have the news that Obama and his allies in the One World,  Utopian community,  are intending to devise a path to environmental enforcement that does not include the ratification of any of the nations of the world,  including the United States. 

The NY Times breaks this news,  with these words:  

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is working to forge a sweeping international climate change agreement to compel nations to cut their planet-warming fossil fuel emissions, but without ratification from Congress.

In preparation for this agreement, to be signed at a United Nations summit meeting in 2015 in Paris, the negotiators are meeting with diplomats from other countries to broker a deal to commit some of the world’s largest economies to enact laws to reduce their carbon pollution. But under the Constitution, a president may enter into a legally binding treaty only if it is approved by a two-thirds majority of the Senate.

Turns out, Obama believes he and his Utopian friends can shame non-compliant nations,  into cooperation.  Clinton Administration representatives,  admit that a legally binding treatise is impossible,  at this time;  as silly as it may sound,  public shaming is the only remaining course of action.   But,  whoever said that Obama was not about “silliness” when trying to do the impossible? 

How concerned should we be regarding this new Utopian scheme?

(Perhaps) All we have to do is look to Kyoto as we seek to see the future for this new,  end run of our “President.” 

If you are not aware,  “Kyoto” was a proposed treaty that required the signees of the treaty to comply with certain and specific emission standards.  It,  also,  provided for fines to be paid and redistributed,  by functionaries at the UN. 

Of the 191 countries signing onto the 1997 Kyoto Protocol,  including “big polluters"  such as Iraq,  Afghanistan,  Iran,  Uganda,  the Dominican Republic, Senegal, and Gambia,  only 31 nations cut “green house emissions” in 2012.  There are no stats for the 2013.

Neither the U.S. nor China signed onto this UN treatise, Australia (a signee) increased its emissions by 8%, in 2012,  Russian and India,  also signees,  registered “zero” reductions in emissions for 2012.   In fact,  as to the non-compliance of the signing parties,  160 of the 191 nations agreeing to Kyoto  did not make an effort to reduce emissions.  This reality has rendered the treaty a colossal failure.  So much for One World Governance. 

Understand that Kyoto was only and always a marketing plan,  by the United Nations,  under the guise of “climate control,  to redistribute the wealth of the Industrialized World,  and,  especially the US,  to the poorer nations.

While the treaty was created in 1997,  the Earth’s warming trend,  came to a screeching halt beginning with 1998,  and has continued to puzzle the Utopian Scientific community since that time,  up to and including 2014. 

The power of enforcement,  under the new Obama/Utopian World scheme, is “public shame.”  That’s right:  the new proposition being developed,  would shame countries who do not sign onto the new agreement or comply with its standards.  Understand this:  Kyoto was actual treatise,  but few nations surrendered their sovereignty to the UN,  as required by this UN agreement.  The question that remains is this: if an actual treatise agreement did not produce compliance,  how will a program of “shame” solve the problem of non-compliance?  The answer is obvious and the mentality that leads Obama to this new effort,  is embarrassing  . . . . .   at least,  on an intellectual level. 

Keep in mind that Obama has worked outside the rule of American law,  from Day One of his Administration.  He has never considered the US Constitution,  a "white man’s document,"  to be a rule of law that binds his office to any specific course of action,  in spite of his rhetoric,  otherwise.  Understand that when rhetoric is countered or contradicted by action,  the rhetoric is nothing but words,  presented to deceive  . . . .   ala all that BS preceding the passage of ObamaCare. 

While the following news (per the NY Times article, cited below) is disturbing,  there really is no reason to believe that this “run-around,” dictatorial and imperialistic move,  will have any lasting value or force. Of course,  should this become accepted law without the benefit of process,  the Utopian Progressives will use it to transfer wealth,  while the those who do not agree with this non-treaty treaty,  will simply ignore it or cut off funding for the program. 

Understand that such a “treaty,”  pressed into force without the benefit of American Law,  will move us a bit more to the Left,  but will not be any more a benefit to the World’s environmental economy that was/is Kyoto.  Again, 191 nations signed onto the Kyoto Protocol,  and look what happened  . . . . .   nothing. 

The Times article,  found here,  admits to the failure of Kyoto,  and offers little hope,  within the words of the article,  that this new agreement/scheme between Obama and the United Nations,  will ever succeed.  The Times gives us this caveat:

In seeking to go around Congress to push his international climate change agenda, Mr. Obama is echoing his domestic climate strategy. In June, he bypassed Congress and used his executive authority to order a far-reaching regulation forcing American coal-fired power plants to curb their carbon emissions. That regulation, which would not be not final until next year, already faces legal challenges, including a lawsuit filed on behalf of a dozen states.

But unilateral action by the world’s largest economy will not be enough to curb the rise of carbon pollution across the globe. That will be possible only if the world’s largest economies, including India and China, agree to enact similar cuts.

So,  the worrisome beat goes on,  as the Utopian/World Without Borders constituencies, continue to move away from democratic processes and real time solutions to a problem created more in their minds eye,  than in reality. 

Sadly,  there are no guarantees that sanity or national sovereignty will survive the antics of the current academic onslaught.  In fact,  if “we” cannot win the next two elections,  chances are the evil amongst us,  will rule the day.  

There is not enough time to impeach the man, but if there was, this would be one of the reason for such action.

35 share

strong read interest

In a recent report in the  Business Insider:

<<<   Khaled Meshaal, the political leader of Hamas, said in a recent interview that he has no plans to “coexist” with Israel as it is structured right now.

“No. I do not want to live with a state of occupiers,” Mashaal said when directly asked if he wants to “coexist” with Israel or recognize the country “as a Jewish state.”

Editor's notes:  Understand that Hamas is a terrorist organization supported by Qatar and Turkey,  two of our our newest allies according to Barack Hussein Obama.  All three,  four if you add in Obama,  "five" if you add in Nancy Pelosi who thinks Hamas is a humanitarian organization,   accept the Muslim Brotherhood,  another terrorist organization.  

There is no doubt who is driving the Palestian/Israeli conflict - those who will not allow Israel to survive as a nation  . . . . .   and Obama is complicit in this,  intentionally or not makes little difference.  

I do not care if he is a Muslim.  All I know is this:  he sure as hell acts like one,  or,  at least,  an ally of the first order.  If one tracts his actions,  and turns off the volume,  you have Obama,  and as they say,  "The Emperor has no clothes."  

To make matters worse,  much worse,  we have the record of a dark-of-night betrayal of Israel before the United Nations.  

In a report found at Foreign Policy,  we have this betrayal of Israel by the Obama/Kerry Cabal:   

Despite a history of rocky relations between U.S. President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Obama administration could largely be counted on to watch Israel’s back in the U.N. Security Council, where it succeeded for more than five years in blocking successive efforts by the Palestinians to gain more of the trappings of an independent state and to get the world body to formally censure Israeli settlement policies.

That changed after the stroke of midnight Sunday when, in the early minutes of Monday, July 28, the U.N. Security Council, with the backing of the United States, issued a formal “presidential statement” demanding that Israel and Hamas implement an “immediate and unconditional” cease-fire to end fighting that has left more than 1,000 Palestinians and 43 Israelis dead. The Palestinians say they will continue to seek Security Council support for a legally enforceable resolution demanding that Israel halt its military offensive in Gaza

Understand that if we look at the actions taken,  and pay no attention to the duplicitous wording of the Administration,  we get a true picture of what happened in the early hours of Monday.  In the end and after 5 years of pure deception,  Barak Obama  has decided to join the enemies of Israel and make "now"  the time to begin his overt betrayal of  Israel.