Obamacare’s “Cadillac tax” will hit one in four employers, most of these employers being the nation's unions, according to analysis released on Tuesday. I have been reminding the readership, for a year, that this coming enrollment period (beginning in October) will finally see the inclusion of the employer mandate. And that mandate includes a 40% tax on quality written health insurance policies, most of which are union sponsored plans.
When I write "40% tax" I am saying that all current quality written, employer sponsored, plans will see a 40% monthly/annual increase to their premiums . . . . in addition to the normal annual premium increases.
I expect to see a huge outcry coming from the unions. I, also, believe that this increase will be a major 2016 campaign issue.
Mission Statement: This blog reviews the news of the day in light of 242 years of American history. "Nationalism," a modern day pejorative, has been our country's politic throughout history, until 2008. Obama changed that narrative. Trump is seeking a return to our historical roots. Midknight Review supports this return to normality.
Showing posts with label ObmaaCare. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ObmaaCare. Show all posts
Some (mostly Democrats) in Congress want their staffers exempt from ObamaCare as if their hardship is of greater concern than that of the larger population.
According
to some in this morning’s new, Boehner
has not been a part of this scheme.
Those politicians involved in this hypocritical nonsense, argue that their staffers don’t earn enough
to pay either the cost of health care or
the fines for not doing so, and
with that complaint, our politicians
prove themselves willfully ignorant of the [identical] complaints of the
people. This is a Democrat bill to the
exclusion of the GOP and proves the political theory that argues for Democrat
One Party Rule to the exclusion of all who oppose their point of view. They
have moved to criminalize opposition speech and failed, to end discussion transmitted over the
air-waves via the so-called “Fairness Doctrine” and failed, and have,
on every turn, worked against the
demonstrable will of the people in its (the Democrat Party) pursuit of Utopian and communal national/world goals.
Understand
that if Boehner was involved in such talks,
early on, he has left that
negotiating table. From all reports, Reid continues to work for this
exemption.
Read
this excerpt from Politico with caution:
The Politico reported:
Congressional
leaders in both parties are engaged in high-level, confidential talks about
exempting lawmakers and Capitol Hill aides from the insurance exchanges they
are mandated to join as part of President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul,
sources in both parties said.
The talks — which
involve Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), House Speaker John Boehner
(R-Ohio), the Obama administration and other top lawmakers — are
extraordinarily sensitive, with both sides acutely aware of the potential for
political fallout from giving carve-outs from the hugely controversial law to
535 lawmakers and thousands of their aides. Discussions have stretched out for
months, sources said.
A
source close to the talks says: “Everyone has to hold hands on this and jump,
or nothing is going to get done.”
Yet if Capitol Hill
leaders move forward with the plan, they risk being dubbed hypocrites by their
political rivals and the American public. By removing themselves from a key
Obamacare component, lawmakers and aides would be held to a different standard
than the people who put them in office.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
