Warning: Do Not Enroll -- Harvard cannot bear criticism and tells critics to "go elsewhere."

Editor's notes:  What is so very controversial about the Harvard warning,  is the fact that it is guilty of the very thing it complains about and that is “anti-intellectualism,”  from the Right.  

Understand that those entities,  especially educational entities,  taking a stance opposing critical differences of opinion are,  themselves,  guilty of anti-intellectual activity.  If an educated political position (in this case) does not include a healthy dose of the opinions of all sides of a debate,  the resulting and final opinions cannot be said to be fully informed  -  and the process that births such inadequacies is, clearly,  not given to a full throttle approach to education.    Keep this is mind as you read this rather childish editorial.

If you might want to insult Harvard down the line, go elsewhere

By The Crimson Staff

If you think Harvard is a revolutionary communist hotbed, don’t apply. If you think Harvard is full of “pinheaded” professors, don’t enroll. And if you think Harvard pollutes the minds of its students, don’t walk out of here with a degree—and certainly don’t get two.

You see, lately, there seems to be a pernicious trend of public figures—especially those on the right—falling in love with Harvard just long enough to benefit from its educational resources and, yes, its social prestige, before turning against our school. Just recently, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas affirmed his belief that Harvard Law School was, during his years as a student there, home to a cohort of “Marxists who believed in…overthrowing the United States government.” In November, Fox News pundit and Harvard Kennedy School graduate Bill O’Reilly glibly referred to Harvard professors as “pinheaded” while implying that the Harvard community is morally suspect for its acceptance of Harvard College Munch, a group for students who share an interest in kinky sex. And last April, presidential candidate Mitt Romney, who holds a J.D. and MBA from our fine institution, lambasted President Obama for having spent “too much time at Harvard.” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Elizabeth Sitting Full of Bull Warren refuses her identify as an Amerian Indian. She wanted to be Sioux instead of Cherokee ??

From the Boston Herald, we learn that Elizabeth Sitting Full of Bull Warren,  will not list herself as “American Indian.”

Despite repeated claims she is “proud” of her Cherokee heritage, newly minted U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren is keeping that pride under wraps and won’t be taking advantage of a chance to officially list herself as the Bay State’s first Native American U.S. senator.

Aides said Warren, who describes herself as part Cherokee and part Delaware Indian, won’t contact historians at the Senate Historical Office to tell them she’s Native American. The office lists minority senators in its official directory.

Warren’s aides refused further comment, but Betty Koed, an associate historian at the Senate Historical Office, said, “If her office wants to call and have her listed, we’d be happy to do so.”

The office’s running tally of African American, Asian, Hispanic and Native American senators is based on the senators’ biographies and self-identification. Despite the extensive reporting of Warren’s claims of her Native American heritage during last year’s campaign. Koed said the senator is not being listed because she didn’t self-identify.

Massachusetts has elected to themselves,  another phony.  Congrats.