The Obama/Holder/Kerry/Hillary crowd would put Tea Party groups on their "terror watch lists" when there has not been a single incident of organized violence such as what is common with the Left (per the story in the Hill).

Editor's notes:  vigilantism is the common,  everyday, Leftist  response to opposition speech.  "Occupy" was and is organized chaos built around the threat of violence.  The New Black Panthers preach hatred of the white man and the death of the "crackers;"   Al Sharpton and his bunch of morons are all about violence,  business burnings and killings (cops);  our national/socialist unions make use of violent thuggery with regularity; men like Bill Ayers,  Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, Sharpton,  Jesse Jackson,  are exonerated from their criminal hate speech and the inciting of violence by the legal wing (Eric Hold and the DOJ)  of the Democrat Progressive Party;  Obama, himself,  uses a divided nation to stay in power as he tears down this once great nation; there is the Black Lunch crowd - a collective of racist blacks bent on hating those who are not members of their group;   the Environmental Movement is is centered in violent action against those who would dare to cut down a tree or burn fossil fuels or work in industries not approved by these admitted Marxists;  doomsday  science has been used to ban such things as DTD,  and, in the wake of such decisions,  millions have died (in Africa and the rain forests) because they are no longer allowed to fight such threats a malaria.  

The Hill
A family-owned pizzeria in Indiana closed on Wednesday following backlash over its support of a controversial religious freedom law.
TMZ reported that Memories Pizza is suspending its business operations amid uproar over the state’s new Religious Freedom Restoration Act.  Owner Kevin O’Connor said vitriol toward his restaurant was so intense it was closed until further notice. The eatery began receiving threatening phone calls and social media postings after revealing its support for the law earlier this week.
______________
After notes:  Understand that my use of  "Utopian" and "Alinsky" and "Marxist"  are all terms that depict what these people proudly claim to be,  behind closed doors and back at Harvard.  I went to college with these clowns in the late 1960's,  and they all proudly claimed to be Marxists.  Now,  when it works against them in terms of election politics,  they pretend to be insulted.  

Just know that I am not "calling them names."  They have studied political utopian theory,  Alinsky social reform theory and Marxist "we are all one" theory,  and are not making millions off their "idealism."  Hypocrites of the worst order,  all.  

Don't buy into the claim that Ryan is a radical conservative. Reality's light destroy's this opinion.

<<<< Obama and the Leftist Cabal worships this book but wants you to believe that a man who wants to honor the Constitution,  wants to balance the budget,  wants to save Medicare and Social Security, is the true radical.

In a recent article (yesterday),  Nate Silver of  FiveThirtyEight polling infamy,  wrote this about Paul Ryan:

. . . . .  Mr. Ryan is the most conservative Republican member of Congress to be picked for the vice-presidential slot since at least 1900. He is also more conservative than any Democratic nominee was liberal, meaning that he is the furthest from the center. . . . . 

This statement is at the heart of why some liberal publications and all conservative venues ignore the polling results of Nate Siler and FiveThirtyEight. 

As we compare Silver's conclusion to reality,  we make the claim that  Joe Biden could not be further removed from the ideological heart of America.  Think about this:  during the 2008 Democrat primaries,  36 million Democrats voted for either Hillary or Obama.  64,000 voted for Biden.  If you divide 64,000 by 36 million and round down the resulting percentage,  you would come up with “Zero.”  Conclusion?   Nate Siler’s assertion that Ryan is more conservative than any VP liberal,  is just plain silly. 

Secondly,  in making the statement, above,  Silver is attempting to sound reasonable while being profoundly ridiculous.  Understand that Silver’s polling concern,  FiveThirtyEight,”  is actually a regular feature of the far,  far Left, New York Times – emphasis on “regular feature.”   Understand that his polling methodologies allow him to weight his polls in favor of Leftist results with impunity (at least,  from the Left).   If Rasmussen or Gallup show a 2 point lead for a conservative,  Silver’s methodology will allow him to “prove” a 4 point lead for the opposing Liberal pundit.  This is why most readers on both sides of the aisle have never heard of “FiveThirtyEight.”  That fact,  in and of itself,  demonstrates Silver’s out of touch ideology. 

A third consideration has to do with the demonstrable inaccuracy of Silver’s opinion with regard to Paul Ryan.  To brand Ryan as an out of touch conservative (that is the point of his polemic as he parrot's the Obama team talking points) is to ignore the fact that Ryan has been elected to his seventh term as a House Representative in a district that is a solid “blue” district as to national politics.  Seven terms,  I say.  So how out of touch is this man?  A reasonable person knows the answer.  

Fourth,  by definition,  it is the Left which stands in "radical" shoes.  The mere fact that on other occasions,  the Left happily claims the title of "radical" is proof of our claim.  Speaking of fact,   it is a fact that their "bible" for societal revolution is  Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals."  It is a fact that Obama taught the principles of societal change out of this very book while teaching "summer school" at Columbia,  and,  Hillary Clinton was an intern for Alinsky in her college days (her B.A. thesis was an expose' and tribute to Alinsky).  Understand that this book was originally written in 1971 and, is in print to this day.  Why?  Obviously,  because it continues to be in demand and "in demand" by the Leftists who have over-run the once patriotic  Democrat Party. 

A final consideration involves Gallup's 40 year poll that proves this nation to be a "center right" country.  Year in and year out,  when asked,  "Are you 'conservative' or 'liberal' without identifying with a political party,"  the conclusion runs a nominal 38 percent to 19 percent in favor of a "conservative" result.  On any occasion,  when the phrase "we are a 'center Right nation,"  the reference is drawing from this Gallup survey.  

Obama has pronounced Paul Ryan as a "radical."  Silver is simply doing his Leftist duty in support of his president.  By Gallup's standards,  it is the Left and Barack Obama that is removed from the ideological center of this nation,  not Paul Ryan and,  by implication,  Mitt Romney.  

Point of post:  this coming election is,  indeed,  an election of choice:  the proven radical,  B Obama and the populace representative,  Mitt Romney.