So, is Billy Kristol and the Washington Free Beacon implicated in the Russian probe? Absolutely not.

How misleading is this headline?  Over 2300 such headlines have gone into print since Trump was sworn into office.  2300 nonsensical, misleading,  and/or outright lies,  since the Trump beginnings.  And this is another one of those headlines. 


New York Times: Conservative Website First Funded Anti-Trump Research by Firm That Later Produced Dossier  

Here are the facts:  The conservative website in question is that of The Washington Free Beacon.  The anti-Trump character involved is none other than Bill Kristol,  one of the first Trump Haters.  And this storyline HAS NOTHING to do with the current probe into Fusion GPS.  Nothing,  and the NY Times knows this.  That is why they wrote  "  . . .   by firm that later produced the Dossier."   "Latter" means,  "has nothing to do with  . . . ." 

Here is an excerpt from the Free Beacon that helps to understand their use of opposition research:  

Free Beacon, 10/27/2017: 
Since its launch in February of 2012, the Washington Free Beacon has retained third party firms to conduct research on many individuals and institutions of interest to us and our readers. In that capacity, during the 2016 election cycle we retained Fusion GPS to provide research on multiple candidates in the Republican presidential primary, just as we retained other firms to assist in our research into Hillary Clinton. All of the work that Fusion GPS provided to the Free Beacon was based on public sources, and none of the work product that the Free Beacon received appears in the Steele dossier.

Go to the Beacon for the rest of the story,  here. 

No comments:

Post a Comment