Take your pick but know this: an 11 point prediction has nothing to do with any potential election year reality.

John Merline / Investor's Business Daily:
Trump Up 2 Points Nationwide, While Clinton Campaigns As If The Race Is Already Won — IBD/TIPP Poll

versus 

Hillary Clinton has vaulted to a double-digit advantage in the inaugural ABC News 2016 election tracking poll

Editor:  Expect to be deluged by the networks and their so-called "tracking polls."  As in all national elections,  the Left with its media trolls,  are working 24/7 to defeat the GOP and Trump  (but that would not change if the challenger was Rubio or Jeb or whoever). 

This is all about the people versus the globalists (more so than ever before) and the globalists have determined that they are not going to lose this election.   

Having said that,  understand this:  Hillary is not going to win the election by 11 percentage points.  No one does.  So,  it is clear that the ABC poll has nothing to do with reality.  It is not predictive of anything because its conclusion(s) are so out of touch with the reality it pretends to survey.   

7 comments:

  1. John, you really need to read this. I know that this is a biased source but the testimony was given in earnest under penalty of prison for perjury.

    http://occupydemocrats.com/2016/10/24/trump-allegedly-tied-13-year-old-girl-raped-struck-face/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are so many issues with this report. For starters, this incident spposedly (i.e. "alledgedly") happened 22 years ago. The supposed 13 year old is 35 years old, today. Why wait until this campaign season to file the complaint (and it is not a criminal complaint, btw)? Why the wait? Because the Dems needed this crap for the campaign? I mean, it is being reported in a Democrat publication that is associated with Occupy, for gawd's sake. Occupy is a godless, communist civilian occupation organization that will say and do anything to destroy this country including the vandalizing of our cities. The case was filed in June of this year, a month before the Republican National Convention, but after it was clear that Trump would be the GOP candidate. Sorry,, but I have no reason to believe anything published by a group who will do and say anything to increase its political power.

      Delete
    2. You idiot. Look at the circumstances.
      #1: The first hearing is set after the election
      #2. The testimony, very detailed and specific, if false would entail prison time for the victim
      #3. The it is a fact that Trump had a social relationship with Epstein, a fellow billionaire who has been convicted as a pedophile, famous for staging sex orgies with underage girls on his private 727. Trump said, "I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy....He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life." Trump flew on Epstein's plane at least once.
      #4. Look at the way Trump talks about women and his constant and admitted cheating on his wives. Does this sound like someone capable of this act? Absolutely.
      #5. This is the bombshell. Why do you suppose this hasn't got much press, even though a high profile lawyer is involved (Cheney Mason) and there are now 3 witnesses in the recent filing? It's because of who else had a relationship with Epstein, and reportedly flew on his planes. None other than Bill Clinton.

      You WILL be hearing more about this in Dec. If you think this has no chance of being true, you truly in denial.

      Delete
    3. Listen to you talk, you stinking Blood Clot. When did they file suit? The moment it became clear that Trump would be the GOP candidate. Is this a criminal trial? The article makes it sound like it is. No mention of a lawsuit involving money. Well, if they are not suing, this is not a serious legal matter because there is a statute of limitations on rape cases. This is not a criminal matter. I can tell a lie with lots of "detail," but I can't bring a lawsuit without hard evidence and there is exactly NONE, in this case . . . . no rape kit, no DNA, no pictures or recording . . . . nothing.

      BTW, did my "Blood Clot" comment hurt? I was going for the maximum amount of pain when I came up that insult. Have a nice day.

      Delete
    4. I think your buddy is in a fetal position after your blood clot line. You two are a riot.

      Delete
  2. This proves you are irrational and your partisanship overrides your fairness and rationality.

    If this were a story about Bill Clinton, you'd be touting it true without reservations. You unabashadly call Bill Clinton 'a rapist' even though there is ... like you said, "no rape kit, no DNA, no pictures or recording . . . . nothing. " But you still do it.

    That proves you can not critically think.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't remember calling Bubba a rapist. But that may not be important, since he has never denied the claims of any of the 18 accusers, especially the five or six that are in the news more often than the others. Jennifer Flowers was a 12 year affair that Bill has never denied and she has lots of evidence including letters back and forth, witnesses of Bill's body guards, pictures together, and like. Most importantly, Bill has never denied her claims. Its a fact. Monica. Everyone knows this happens . . . . emphasis on "knows." Paula Jones receieved a "settlement" check from Bill for a total of $850,000 AFTER the court through her case out . . . . he went ahead and paid her anyway.

      Your shorts are way too tight if you think I am the one who cannot think critically. The is the charges against Bill are not similar to those against Trump. The fact of the matter, in all of the 12 cases Dems want us to believe, is this: there is no evidence. There never was an attempt to sue. There are not police reports or pictures of abuse . . . . you know, the kinds of things that exist in real rape cases. Prove me wrong instead of flapping your gums.

      Delete