How bad is this supposed "global warming?" One degree Celsius since 1760 and the beginning of the industrial revolution.

2015 is on course for being the warmest year on record. The current average global temperature is around 15C, 1C warmer than before the industrial revolution.  (sky.com)

How bad is this supposed "global warming?"  One degree Celsius since 1760 and the beginning of the industrial revolution.  That's one lousy degree in 250 years. 

But the Left will continue to scream "The sky is falling,  the sky is falling  !!!!!"  

Did you know that weather scientists are prediction a 10 year mini-cold age because of a quiet spell with our Sun?  

Its all cool,  folks.  Its all cool.  

6 comments:

  1. To the average uninformed person, a global increase of 1 degree doesn't seem much like a big deal. But when you consider that such global temperature changes are much more exaggerated in the arctic, we see that one global degree increase IS very significant. The PETM mass extinction event resulted because of a warming of just 5º over a few THOUSAND yrs. A global rise of 1º in 250 yrs is faster than the temperature rise prior to the PETM extinction event.

    Clearly, we are presently in the most drastic period of global climate change in human history.

    Yes, there have been ice ages and climate changes in human history, but nothing like the warming event that occurred 55 million years ago that resulted in the melting of the arctic and mass impacts on species evolution.

    But ...ignorant people have a problem with perspective and short sightedness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What a load of crap. You guys have been preaching mass extinction for as long as I can remember. The Ozone layer was going to fry us all. The affect of acid rain was irreversible. World drought was going to kill us all back in the 70's. Then there was the threat of a global ice age. And if the increase in ice cap temps (both northern and southern) is 2 degrees, the increase has very little effect on ice free zones.

      The earth has had 5 major ice ages, major major, dating from 2.4 billion years ago to 12,000 years ago. Their cause is unknown in terms of specifics, but all the contributing factors are larger than whatever man has done, in view of the fact that all ice ages have occurred before man could have possibly influenced their existence . . . . . 5 major ages but dozens of more minor occurrences. What happens between these ice ages is what the fear mongers call "global warming."

      As any reasonable person can see, warming/cooling, even on a scale harmful to human existence, is larger than human activity, unavoidable, and cyclical. Warming/cooling is an existentially systemic reality that testifies to the life of this earth Those who disagree, are ignorant of the historicity of Earth's cycles and short sighted when it comes to prevention.

      Delete
    2. Yes genius, tell us how many people lived in Manhattan, New Orleans, DC, and Miami Beach during the last ice age?

      Of course natural cycles are greater than human activity, but any idiot can see, we are NOT in a natural cycle. http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

      When you say in your first sentence, "you guys" ... you are admitting you are not only building 'strawmen', but are generally taking the side of science denial. We already knew that. And if you pretend today's science is on the same level of technology as science 40 yrs ago, you show yourself to be even more ignorant and regressive.

      Delete
    3. "You guys" = you Marxist, commie oriented, junk science peddling New Progressives . . . . hardly strawman.

      I (we) believe in scientific data.

      And I see no improvement whatsoever in your ability to predict the future using your fearmongering mathematical modeling.

      Delete
    4. Yes, science data ... you believe when it comes from CFACT or the Heartland Inst.

      But not from the US Military or NASA. http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

      Delete
    5. The chart on your referenced site ? You think I deny what it presents as truth? Keep in mind, there is a requirement within the federal government , one that demands full rhetorical compliance with Progressive Fear Mongering Leadership. You will never see an objective article from NASA because it is against Administration law to preach anything but the party line, when it comes to climate change. So, you pardon me for not believing those who have no choice to but preach the Party's agenda.

      Keep in mind: (1) warmer weather means increased growing seasons. (2) more CO2 means more "food" supply for our crops. (3) And, finally, "warming" is what goes on between ice ages. EVERY warming trend, in Earth's history, has been followed by an ice age . . . . . we are past due for a cold spell. And watch what the Left does with THAT crisis. You guys are pathetic.

      Delete