With this headlined story, Hillary proves that she, as President, would politicize the Supreme Court.


<<<<  The Supreme Court has two Obama appointees.  Nevertheless,  it has made 20 unanimous (9 to Zero) decisions against the Obama Administration.  Why is that important?  The following commentary might give an explanation.  

Washington Post:
Hillary Clinton's litmus test for Supreme Court nominees: a pledge to overturn Citizens United  —  Hillary Clinton told a group of her top fundraisers Thursday that if she is elected president, her nominees to the Supreme Court will have to share her belief that the court's 2010 Citizens United decision must … 
Editor's notes:  Understand that it is one thing for the Court to make decisions that have political impact,  and quite another thing for political outsiders to seek to align the Court's judicial council along political party lines   . . . . . . .   and this latter consideration is exactly what Hillary proposes to do.  Surprisingly shallow and partisan,  even for a Clinton.  

No comments:

Post a Comment