If Palin knew what Obama and his advisers did not, who is the most qualified to be Commander in Chief and the leader of a strong and free nation? (Hint: the answer is as obvious as the Russian invasion of Ukraine.)

From Breitbart

Palin said then:

After the Russian Army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama's reaction was one of indecision and moral equivalence, the kind of response that would only encourage Russia's Putin to invade Ukraine next.

For those comments, she was mocked by the high-brow Foreign Policy magazine and its editor Blake Hounshell, who now is one of the editors of Politico magazine. 

In light of recent events in Ukraine and concerns that Russia is getting its troops ready to cross the border into the neighboring nation, nobody seems to be laughing at or dismissing those comments now.

Hounshell wrote then that Palin's comments were "strange" and "this is an extremely far-fetched scenario."

"And given how Russia has been able to unsettle Ukraine's pro-Western government without firing a shot, I don't see why violence would be necessary to bring Kiev to heel," Hounshell dismissively wrote. 


Palin made her remarks on the stump after Obama's running mate Joe Biden warned Obama supporters to "gird  your loins" if Obama is elected because international leaders may test or try to take advantage of him.

Editor's notes:  Turns out that tough guys and moralless people always go after the weak and unsuspecting.  You would think a foreign policy expert such as Hounshell would know that  -  but liberals have this genetic defect thing going for them.  It renders then "stupid" when it comes to spending other peoples money,  domestic and foreign policy,  and,  the waging of war,  among a host of other issues.  

Palin made her prediction based on commonsense.  Hounshell, now proven to be the actual nutcase in this story,  knows nothing about foreign policy if the invasion of Ukraine was unpredicatable to him.   


No comments:

Post a Comment