Understand that while Obama's assault against this nation's
soul (its Constitution and founding principles) remains a serious concern, the
notion that his presidency has "fundamentally transformed" this
country into something that it was not before his Imperial Presidency, is
so wrong as to be laughable.
In May of 2008, Michelle Obama described her
radicalized husband with these words: "Barack knows that we
are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our
conversation; we're going to have to change our traditions, our history; we're
going to have to move into a different place as a nation."
Her dream of a nation with a different history, filled
with different traditions, headed in a totally different direction (i.e.
"fundamental transformation") is over.
Of the 61 headlines on Drudge, Thursday morning,
only two headlines had anything to do with "something Obama."
The House voted against ObamaCare for the 38th time and a federal court
declared Obama's "recess" appointments to the National Relations
Review Board to be unconsititutional, the third federal court to do so.
The remaining 59 headlines had nothing to do with Obama. He has
become irrelevant.
Understand that the Obama Doctrine has been taken to the
Supreme Court 25 times, during his first 4.5 years in office; he
has lost his case on 15 of those occasions. Preceding presidencies have a
70% success rate in defending their agenda at the High Court level; Obama
stands at 37% and that does not include lower court decisions such as the NLRB
decision of this past week.
He has more than 20 scandals to his credit, four of
which are currently in the news, and has no stated agenda for the
remaining 3.5 years as "president."
He is a nothing burger . . . . . . . and we are
happy to document that fact, in this post, well before his time to
retire has come. The nation has been sorely injured because of his
feckless rule, but "fundamentally transformed?" ---
well, that did not happen.
You should know that I am not the only one who sees the Obama presidency as the abject failure that it is. I end this post with several lede stories that make the same point. Make note that these stories come from the Huffington Post, the Wall Street Journal, the Daily Beast, Fox News, all major publications crossing the lines of the liberal/conservative devide.
Dan Agin: Obama's Failure: A Presidency Without Ideology
www.huffingtonpost.com/.../obamas-failure-a-presiden_b_3194050.htmMay 1, 2013 - Obama's presidency is not a conservative presidency; it's not a liberalpresidency; it's a nothing presidency. At most a caretaker presidency, the ...
Ayers: Obama presidency gets a 'failing grade' | The Daily Caller
dailycaller.com/2013/06/.../ayers-obama-gets-a-failing-grade-as-presiden...Jun 18, 2013 - Obama should 'absolutely' be put on trial for war crimes, he says.
Fred Barnes: The Decline of the Obama Presidency - WSJ.com
online.wsj.com/.../SB1000142412788732441260457851948231314740...Jun 2, 2013 - President Obama after speaking at a fundraising event in Chicago, May 29. ... By failing to ensure that the GOP had some influence on the ...
Obama still failing as CEO of USA, Inc. | Fox News
www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/06/.../obama-still-failing-as-ceo-usa-in...Jun 10, 2013 - President Obama is failing as CEO of the U.S government. His appointment of Susan Rice to be his top national security adviser and other ...
Why Obama Is No FDR: The Failure of a Progressive Movement ...
www.thedailybeast.com/.../why-obama-is-no-fdr-the-failure-of-a-progres...Jun 10, 2013 - Jonathan Alter's new history of the Obama presidency covers the 2010 midterm shellacking to his 2012 reelection—years defined by our failure ...
No comments:
Post a Comment