Understand that both Hillary and Barack are extreme anti-gun
enthusiasts. Hillary has announced her desire to use United Nations
control to ban guns, entirely. While Barack has not made such an
announcement (he sill believes that we are fooled by
his rhetorical nonsense), he is implementing a stealth campaign
against the 2nd Amendment. Here is a letter of warning from Senator Ran
Paul dealing with this subject:
Dear fellow American,
Nearly 1 million American firearms banned by a stroke of Barack Obama’s pen.
In a move unprecedented in American history, the Obama Administration quietly banned the re-importation of nearly 600,000 American made M1 Carbine rifles.
And I've just discovered Obama may be blocking as many 300,000 1911 Colts too! That's nearly one million pieces of American history denied to the American people.
The M1 Carbine, developed in the late 1930’s, carried the United States through World War II seeing action in every major battle.
Now, South Korea, which received the rifles as a loan during the Korean War, wants to give American gun collectors the chance to get their hands on this unique piece of history.
But according to Hillary Clinton’s State Department there is a danger they might,possibly, one day “fall into the wrong hands.”
Let me be clear: at no time in U.S. history has the ownership of this firearm -- or any part of this firearm -- been illegal, restricted or banned.
Americans have collected World War II M1 Carbines for decades.
I’m helping lead the fight to defeat this radical gun ban in the United States Senate and I want your help.
Please join me by taking a public stand AGAINST this outright assault on our Second Amendment rights by signing the Official Firearms Freedom Survey below!
For Freedom,
Rand Paul
U.S. Senator (R-KY)
Rand Paul
U.S. Senator (R-KY)
Like the US doesn't have enough guns or availability?
ReplyDeleteWhat a moron.
What does that have to do with the 2nd amendment? I have two guns, and in short order, I intend to own at least 10 cases of shells. Next, two 9 mm hand guns and another 10 cases of ammunition --------- for starters.
ReplyDeleteThe only reason to take guns away from law abiding people is for the purpose of future control of those people.
Despite the recent ridicule coming from the Left, if the Germans had owned guns, their situation would have been different. What YOU morons don't know is this - the German army was out-numbered 10 to 1 or more. Only idiots think that freedom is not worth fighting and dying for. But the Germans were good little sheep, and, in the end, they died in the ovens for no reason except their own fear of rebellion.
That sort of thing would never happen in the country, at least, not without a fight. But of course, you libs would be crying, “Don’t make them angry. Maybe they will go away” -- kind of like what Obama is doing with our nuclear arsenal and enemy forces in Russian, China, Iran, and where ever.
2nd amendment remedies?
ReplyDeleteLike we're facing a Nazi regime?
WTF is wrong with you?
I guess this proves you're an anti-American terrorist.
Maybe you missed my point: THERE IS NO GOOD REASON FOR TAKING AWAY GUNS OWNED BY LAW ABIDING CITIZENS -- NONE. You disagree, heir comrade ???
ReplyDelete