The dialectic of deceit that is the rhetorical strategy of the Holder/Obama team and its use in the Brian Terry apology letter . . . . .

Eric Holder, in the classless style that has come to typify the man, was forced to write a letter of apology to the family of Brian Terry, after being raked over the coals in a recent Senate hearing. Understand that in this week's Senate hearings, Holder refused to even admit that an apology was necessary.

On Friday, it was revealed that he had written "the" letter. But, before the Terry family had received it, the fact of the letter was released to the press, proving that with this jerk, its all about politics - and in his case, forced politics.

In black politics, there is a rhetorical strategy called "racialization," a fancy word for codifying the need to say what others - especially the white man - want to hear, and then, doing whatever else the author wants to do. For what it is worth, I call this "the dialectic of deceit." This has never been more a strategy of preference than with this bunch in our White House. And Holder is the worst of the worst in this category of thought. With Holder and Obama, racialization is at the very center of black identity politics. I hasten to add that many black leaders reject this methodology. But, within the radicalized black community, as defined by Saul Alinsky's style of radical reform, racialization is not only a popular idea, but a preferred strategy. It is borne from the doctrine of "ends and means" as discussed in chapter two of Rules for Radicals. Holder's letter is a physical manifest of racialization. The letter expresses a political solution to an otherwise, repulsive attitude of black arrogance on the part of the Holder/Obama team - and that is the dialectic to which I refer. In truth, Holder's letter of apology means nothing.

For more on the black bias of the current administration . . . . .

"Although the Department of Justice's prosecution of these thugs began in the last days of the Bush administration, and the defendants had offered no legal defense, the case was dropped by the Justice Department after Eric Holder took over. One of the lawyers who were prosecuting that case resigned in protest. That lawyer -- J. Christian Adams -- has now written a book, titled "Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department." It is a thought-provoking book and a shocking book in what it reveals about the inner workings of the Department of Justice's civil rights division. Bad as the Justice Department's decision was to drop that particular case, which it had already won in court, this book makes painfully clear that this was just the proverbial tip of the iceberg. Despite the efforts of some in the media and in politics to depict the voter intimidation in Philadelphia as just an isolated incident involving a few thugs at one voting place, former U.S. Attorney Adams shows that these thugs were in fact part of a nationwide organization doing similar things elsewhere. Moreover, the civil rights division of the Justice Department has turned the same blind eye to similar voter intimidation and corruption of the voting process by other people and other organizations in other cities and states

-- so long as those being victimized were white and the victimizers were black.Continued... "

Injustice is supposed to be blind. Yet, as Department of Justice whistleblower and election lawyer J. Christian Adams divulges in his new book, justice under the Obama Administration is anything but blind. He reveals the never-before-published story of the corrupt, racialist, and politicized inner workings of the Obama Justice Department as well as the untold tale of the DOJ's corrupt handling of the New Black Panther voter-intimidation case. As a former Department of Justice attorney in the Voting Rights Section, Adams has witnessed firsthand how the DOJ is aggressively executing a radical, race-based, left-wing agenda through its policies and employees. After watching the DOJ continually turn a blind eye to voter fraud, blatant racism, and voter rights abuses, he finally blew the whistle during the New Black Panther case – a case that Adams brought to the DOJ's attention and ultimately resigned over because of the corruption and perjury he witnessed leading up to and following the case's orchestrated dismiss

Michelle Obama wrote her senior paper, at Princeton, on the issue of educated blacks and the responsibility they have to the black community because of both their ethnicity and their education.

The title of the thesis is "Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community" and can be found here: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4.

You may want to download the paper. Four years ago, I wrote a monograph on "racialization and the black politic." The use of  "racialization" as a black strategy was a documented fact taken from black authorship. Those references no longer exist. Perhaps the disappearance of Obama's paper will be next to disappear.


At the very end of the paper, Obama gives eight sources, all books written by authors considered to be radical, at some level. Stokely Carmichael and the more intellectual, Charles Hamilton, authored the book, Black Power, and the list of Obama's sources goes downhill from there.

Understand that her thesis is hardly a radical application, except, perhaps, for her biased preference that blacks must help blacks. At any rate, there is nothing "harmful" in Obama's conclusions. It is just that her social inbreeding is apparent in the writing of this paper. She is a breath away from asserting that "only" blacks can help blacks. Understand that Barack's determination for the expansion of social welfare programs has everything to do with black-on-black fulfillment.


Barack once described Michelle as his mentor. Assuming that to be true, when the two came to the White House, the over-all motivation for their social agenda came from the expressed thinking laid out in Michelle's thesis. If not, why not?

Your assignment, should you chose to accept, is to ferret out the black application of "racialization" as you delve into the backgrounds of the several authors named in Obama's bibliography.