The 2012 Democrat/Obama battle plan detailed here.

There is a campaign strategy battle going on, one that many conservative have missed (perhaps). Understand that we all think the coming 2012 election will be a referendum vote on Obama in specific, and the radicalized Democrat leadership* in general. Indeed, this will be the case.

If the radicalized Democrat Party cannot deflect a portion of this referendum vote, they are standing at the precibus of a second, consecutive, landslide election against their policies.

Obama and Company must work to accomplish a very different strategy. They know it will not be enough to deny, deny, deny. Nor can they simply make up a phony success record. We all lived through the past three years and know the truth. The Obama 2008 campaign of glowing rhetoric and promises upon promises is a strategy that must remain a not to distant memory, as well.

So, what remains? Well, judging from Obama's recent verbal campaign, it appears that he intends to work the following "battle plan." He intends to

1. present himself as "the man in the middle," running not only against the GOP, but Congress. This will play an increasing role in the Obama war of words;
2. present himself as the champion of the middle class despite the fact that it is the middle class standing at the voting booth doors, ready to vote him out of office;
3. point to "personal initiative" as he circumvents Constitutional legislative processes. The "We can't wait" campaign will be something that survives into next year
4. present himself as the only mature legislative representative on the Hill; he knows best, even in the face of opposition from members of his own party;
5. vilify segments of our society (bankers and certain CEO's) that are under serious scrutiny but exist without the power of a substantial minority vote. There is a strand of envy existing in all of us. Obama intends to build on that fault;
6. portray Mitt Romney, should he be the GOP candidate, as "Obama II." This is why "they" are in full assault mode in the effort to dethrone Herman Cain. Understand that the campaign against Romney is already fixed. Romney is predictable, always a bad thing when it comes to waging war. Cain is not predictable, especially when it comes to his popular appeal. In Herman Cain, the Obama radicals are facing an executive with as much success in the business community as Romney AND, he is a true outsider. Jimmy Carter, despite the fact that he was the Governor of Georgia, ran as a Washington outsider . . . and that strategy worked.
7. make this an issues related election. The Dems and Obama will to do what they can to push the issues of voter registration, abortion rights, the continuing war in Afghanistan, comprehensive immigration, the increasing "impoverished" population, and the need for a larger and more aggressive Central Government to protect "the little guy."
8. continue to typify the GOP as obstructionist, despite the fact that the GOP is the only party on the hill, passing legislation and actually trying to get something done, in a demonstrable fashion.
9. continue to demonize any and all of the GOP leadership. The GOP primary candidates will be included, of course, as well as John Boehner, the crafty Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, Eric Cantor and more. Because this bunch of radicalized misfits believes that the ends really do justify the means, lies - both personal and political - will at the center of their "demon" strategy.

Understand that with an offensive strategy as varied as this, the hope is that something will appeal to the voters, giving the Marxist Dems a shot at survival. Should they lose this election with the predicted margins, a second consecutive landslide defeat, their socialist agenda will be set back several generations, and they are fully aware of this potentiality. For the Left, much more than for the right, this particular election is a life and death for battle for political survival and populace acceptance.

Footnoted commentary:

* understand that "radicalized Democrat party" or "the Marixist whatever," are terms used by this editor to describe a part of the Democrat Party . . . . . . not all of that party. We have always had a liberal agenda to deal with, from the very beginning of this nation's existence. Our political process was designed to be one based on confrontation, the pitting of one idea against the other. It is a dialectic circumstance to which the only alternative is one-party rule or an individual and dictatorial form of governance. For the first time in American history and because of the Obama/111th congressional partnership (read "conspiracy"), we have gotten a real-time taste of both these alternative forms of government.

WE don't like either.

Besides being a mess, personal freedoms are not benefited and the greatness of this country is threatened. This did not begin with the current Administration, but it this Administration that intends to "bring it home" with regards to the advancement of a controlling, centralized.

When you stop to think about it, a "centralized government" is nothing less than a form of incorporated dictatorship; it must always be avoided by those over which the corporate dictatorship intends to rule.

Anyway, there are good libs and there are traitors. The good libs are not always wrong; the traitors, i.e. the radicalized Left, must be driven out of the American political arena; they do not belong here.