In defense of "ideological purity."

A hundred CEO's have sworn off political contributions until congressional legislators "stop the partisan gridlock in Washington, D.C." They are lead by Starbuck's number one honcho, Howard Schutlz, who has criticized congress for having "chosen to put partisan and ideological purity over the well being of the people."

What this clown does not understand is this: there is a difference between partisanship and "ideological purity." Partisanship alone, stops congress from reaching solutions. Ideological purity as in American values and foundational concepts versus communism, or a new world order, cannot be abandoned because some coffee maker does not see the importance of that political battle. With the Lefties, there is never a time when standing firm for foundational values is in order, when faced with dire consequences and social/economic disaster.

Look at the TEA Party. They are declared "radicals" because they believe in traditional values and want a balanced budget.

Take a look at the Queer Nation crowd. First, it was just about abnormal sex (also known as "gay sex"). Then, the dress up crowd got involved (we call these people "transgendered"). They promised that they were not about indoctrinating our kids, and now, they are everywhere in our schools. Then the man/boy love thing came to the forefront, and, in recent weeks, it has been revealed that a push for acceptance of pedophilia is being given greater emphasis. All this while the Left is enraged over prayer before football games or a religious presence at the 9/11 memorial, to be held in a couple of weeks.

When we do not strive for "ideological purity," far left, atheist, midgets such as New York's Mayor Bloomberg, are accepted into the so-called conservative Republican Party and given a place of prominence. One party of misfits is enough. Let the Dems have this moral moron (Bloomberg) and the likes of Arnold Schwartzenegger. Know this with certainty: the Lefties of this day would never fight for constitutional freedoms as did our founding fathers; after all, that fight was all about ideological purity. "Can't we all get along" is about compromise and in compromise, civil liberties and social/political freedoms are lost. . . . forever.

No comments:

Post a Comment