Can a Tea-Party representative win a House seat in the bowels of New York state?? We're thinking "yes" especially when her opponent is afraid that the island of Guam might capsize and sink into the Pacific. Got to love them Democrats.


<<<  Tea Party all the way, running for Representative in the House.  Her Democrat opponent once was afraid that Guam might tip over and sink into the Pacific.  

Here is a moving recollection of flying into New York on September 11, 2001 and watching in horror - out of an airplane window - as the World Trade Center towers were in flames. Liz Carter is the Republican nominee running for Congress against incumbent Hank Johnson (D-GA-04) in the Atlanta metro area.The pilot announced, “It’s a clear day and we are just passing over Manhattan. If you look out the window you will see….” His voice trailed off as I stared out my window in shock. A plane had just hit The World Trade Center Tower and smoke was starting to bellow into the air. As confusion reigned, nobody knew what exactly was happening... A series of announcements from a pilot who was clearly in shock. “We are not quite sure what type of aircraft has hit the tower,” “Ladies and gentleman we have just learned the tower has been hit by a commercial jet,” “Please stay calm as we attempt to find out what is happening,” “A second plane has hit The World Trade Center,” and then something happened. I tried to reflect on my life, but memories of my father’s teachings about our Country, my America, rushed into my head. I felt my core wrench in disbelief upon the realization that something was very wrong. Read all of Liz Carter's blog post here... You may remember Carter's opponent Johnson as the Congressman who feared that the island of Guam would "capsize and sink" if more military personnel were housed there.  

(text taken from rogersparkbench.blogspot.com)

______________________

Read Hack Wilson,  the blog,  and his exclusive interview with Liz Carter.  

GOP Convention Schedule: C-Span coverage begins at 4:30 pm pt. On tap: Marco Rubio, Clint Eastwood and Governor Mitt Romney (no article).

Sometimes, debating with the Left gets rather boring. After Ryan's speech, the Left went nuts. Here is a rebuttal to their thoughtless claims as presented in 5 points, taken from The New Republic.

<<<<  Best rebuttal to "Ryan lies about the GM plant."   The Marxist socialists could not be more wrong and here is absolute proof.

From the New Republic:  I’d like to talk, instead, about what Ryan actually said—not because I find Ryan’s ideas objectionable, although I do, but because I thought he was so brazenly willing to twist the truth.
At least five times, Ryan misrepresented the facts. And while none of the statements were new, the context was. It’s one thing to hear them on a thirty-second television spot or even in a stump speech before a small crowd. It’s something else entirely to hear them in prime time address, as a vice presidential nominee is accepting his party’s nomination and speaking to the entire country.
Here are the five statements that deserve serious scrutiny:
1) About the GM plant in Janesville.
By the way, nobody questions that, if not for the Obama Administration’s decision to rescue Chrysler and GM, the domestic auto industry would have crumbled. Credible estimates suggested that the rescue saved more than a million jobs. Unemployment in Michigan and Ohio, the two states with the most auto jobs, have declined precipitously.
Editor’s notes:  more than 60,000 net jobs were lost with the closing of GM and an Obama managed bankruptcy that stripped hundreds of thousands of union retirees of their pension funds and the  protected equities in those trusts.  He raped his own people,  to give the AFL-CIO’s pension and legacy funds,  new life.  That is a fact. 
More than this,  here is the end result of the Washington Examiner’s research on this closing,  and it turns out that Ryan was more “right” than he might have suspected: 
The Washington Post, and a host of other liberal media outlets, are calling this passage “misleading” because the Janesville plant “closed before the president was inaugurated.” The Post is dead wrong. Here are the facts:
1. On February 13, 2008 Obama said in Janesville : “I believe that if our government is there to support you, and give you the assistance you need to re-tool and make this transition, that this plant will be here for another hundred years.”
2. In June 2008 GM announced that the Janesville plant would stop production of medium-duty trucks by the end of 2009, and stop production of large SUVs in 2010 or sooner.
3. In October 2008 Obama doubled down on his promise to keep Janesville plant open: “As president, I will lead an effort to retool plants like the GM facility in Janesville so we can build the fuel-efficient cars of tomorrow and create good-paying jobs in Wisconsin and all across America.”
4. In December 2008 GM idled production of GM SUVs at the Janesville plant. Medium-duty truck assembly continued.
5. In April 2009, four months after Obama was inaugurated, GM idled production of medium-duty trucks.
6. In September 2011, more than two years after Obama was inaugurated, GM reiterates that Janesville plant is on “stand by status.” Auto industry observer David Cole, tells the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinelit would be premature to say the Janesville plant will never reopen.
6. Today the GM facility in Janesville still has not been retooled “so we can build the fuel-efficient cars of tomorrow and create good-paying jobs,” as Obama promised. 
Source: Washington Examiner. 

This was aired in April of 2009.  


2) About Medicare.
Editor's notes:  The New Republic article is more complicated a charge than the others.   You may need to read the New Republic article at this point. 
Suffice it to say that the Left continually refers to the “Ryan Plan”  as if the Romney Plan does not exist or is of no consequence or is identical.  
Understand that you cannot cut future expenditures without cutting benefits.  And the $716 trillion in Obama's Medicare  “cuts”  were,  indeed,  cuts,  intended by the Administration to be used to balance the expenditures replete in ObamaCare. If they are not "cuts,"  they balance nothing.  
Here are those cuts,  as per the CBO.  ………………………


A  new Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report updated the amount of money Obamacare robs out of Medicare from $500 billion to a whopping $716 billion between 2013 and 2022.   According to the CBO, the payment cuts in Medicare include:
  • A $260 billion payment cut for hospital services affecting the aged and disabled, exclusively.
  • A $39 billion payment cut for skilled nursing services effecting  private care facilities, nurses in mental health facilities,  and in-home care for the elderly and needy. 
  • A $17 billion payment cut for hospice services  --  the poor who are near death are the ones affected by this cut (part of Palin's 'death panels'). 
  • A $66 billion payment cut for home health services. Again,  it is the poor and needy most affected by this deduct. 
  • A $33 billion payment cut for all other services.
  • A $156 billion cut in payment rates in Medicare Advantage (MA); $156 billion is before considering interactions with other provisions. The House Ways and Means Committee was able to include interactions with other provisions, estimating the cuts to MA to be even higher, coming in at $308 billion.
The New Republic article says this:  By the way, Obamacare's cut to Medicare was a reduction in what the plan pays hospitals and insurance companies. And the hospitals said they could live with those cuts, because Obamacare was simultaneously giving more people health insurance, alleviating the financial burden of charity care.
More notes:  Interesting.  Where is this unqualified statement of agreement from the hospitals, the nursing associations,  hospice,  and special care facilities?  As unqualified and unanimous in opinion,  such does not exist . 
And about this business of “full national coverage?”  After all is said and done, more than 23 Americans will remain without coverage. 
3) About the credit rating downgrade.
From the New Repulic’s article:  Ryan blamed the downgrading of American debt on Obama. But it was the possibility that America would default on its debts that led to the downgrade. And why did that possibility exist? Because Republicans refused to raise the debt ceiling, playing chicken not just with the nations’ credit rating but the whole economy, unless Obama would cave into their budget demands. 
Here is the truth,  directly from S & P:  
S&P made the stunning move despite the recent congressional deal to raise the country's debt ceiling and heavy lobbying last night from Obama-administration officials, who said S&P's calculations were off by $2 trillion. . . . . . . "The downgrade reflects our opinion that the fiscal-consolidation plan that Congress and the administration recently agreed to falls short of what, in our view, would be necessary to stabilize the government's medium-term debt dynamics," S&P said. 
The debt-ceiling deal was projected to lop off about $2 trillion from America's deficit over the next decade, but S&P had previously warned it would downgrade the credit rating if the cut didn't reach $4 trillion.

Read more at the New York Post.  


Editor’s notes:  well,  that was an easy rebuttal !
4) About the deficit.
From the New Republic article:  “Ryan said “President Obama has added more debt than any other president before him” and proclaimed “We need to stop spending money we don’t have.” In fact, this decade’s big deficits are primarily a product of Bush-era tax cuts and wars. (See graph.) And you know who voted for them? Paul Ryan. 
Editor’s notes:  Does this author not know that the deficits – since the Bush tax cuts – averaged $450 billion,  not 1.3 trillion as we see in the Obama years?  THAT is a fact. 
Does this author not know that  TARP funding was not appropriated until end of 2008,  that nearly all of the TARP funding was Administered by Barack Obama and his minions?  That “TARP” continues until this day,  when it was originally intended to be a short term solution;  that Obama redirected the TARP funds away from toxic asset relieve,  in total  --  not spending a single dime of TARP on that for which was designed? 
Also, as a final point, here,  the reader should be reminded of Obama’s three failed budget proposals,  each put up for congressional vote,  each failing to secure a single vote from anyone  --  97 to Nothing,  99 to Nothing (both Senate votes  - I assume the gutless Harry Reid “abstained”),  and 414 to Nothing in the House.  Why?  Because his proposals added 11 trillion dollars to the national debt over a ten year period and no one wanted their name tied to such idiocy.   

5) About protecting the weak.
Editor’s notes:  If this report was a true review of the facts,  the author would have taken the time to presents Ryan’s comments in view of the article’s claim.  It is so easy to criticize a proposed plan when the other side has no plan,  when the critics offer no plan,  and when the author’s partisan conclusion are,  well,  his own partisan conclusion. 
This is what I know  -  no thinking and caring people within the Conservative movement and the GOP believe in the “you are on your own”  doctrine when applied to the weak,  the very poor,  the uneducated and the indent.  No one.  Such a claim,  as echoed on MSNBC , CNN,  and the three primetime television networks, want their viewers to believe. 


According to the blog, "Hack Wilson," 19 women and 17 minoriity speeches have been presented on center stage at the Republican National Convention. Hello the New GOP from a 67 year old white guy. (no article)

Obama's foreign policy or lack thereof, is dangerous and threatens our national future. Iran is living proof. Today we learn that this rogue nation has doubled its nuclear centrifuges.

Thanks to The Right Perspective

<<<  Did you know that Saudi Arabia has approved of Israel attacking Iran,  while Obama is busy revealing Israeli attack plans?

The IAEA [today 8/30/12]  is telling us that Iran has doubled its count of centrifuges located in what is feared to be  an impenetrable underground [Fox News].  The only people who believe that Obama has a vibrant foreign policy are those who either hate colonial America or are completely uninformed. 

He cut and ran from Iraq,  meddled in Egyptian politics,  backstabbing Mubarak and opening the door to a complete,  Muslim Brotherhood takeover of that country when,  before the Backstabbing,  such was not in the cards.  He defended his interference in Libya,  bragging that he responded in under 30 days while sitting on his hands for 18 months,  watching more than 30,000 Syrians,  mostly innocent civilians,  butchered by the their president.  

And,  last December,  he began a 10 day,  four million dollar vacation courtesy of the American taxpayer, on the very weekend Iran charged its first nuclear reactor. 

His wife has taken 17 vacations costing  millions and millions of taxpayer dollars.  As a First Couple,  they have consumed more caviar than any first couple in our history and conducted more after-hours White House parties (approaching an unbelievable 3,000 in total) than any of his predecessors. 

Obama has made more televised speeches than all presidents since and including FDR,  combined  (726 such speeches in the first year).   Understand that this is significant to this point:  he will have spent less than 9 months,  sitting on his butt,  in governance,  out of the 48 months he has pretended to be president. 

Think about this:  how long would it take you to play 110 rounds of golf (18 to 36 holes),  especially when you are terrible at the game?  Are we talking about three months???  Three months of doing absolutely nothing but playing games. 

Point of post:  just to remind the reader of the fact that Barack Obama is the most prolific “do nothing” we have ever had in office of President.  

As to Obama revealing Israeli attack plans, I specifically have in mind Obama exposing the arrangement between Turkey and Israel,  giving Israel a staging base close enough to Iran to make its attack wholly viable.  Traitorous.  At Foreign Policy,  last March,  we were told of this circumstance  --  the implicit result of an Administration intent on preventing an Israeli attack on Iran,  "leaking" information to the American press.  
____________________

Update:  News from Yahoo:


 Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday slammed the wide international participation at a Non-Aligned summit in Tehran as a "stain on humanity" following Iran's denial of Israel's right to exist.

"Today, over 120 countries are in Tehran, saluting a regime that not only denies the Holocaust but pledges to annihilate the Jewish state, brutalises its own people, colludes in the murder of thousands of innocent Syrians and leads millions in chanting 'Death to America, death to Israel'," he said.

"So many in the international community appear to have learned nothing. I think this is a disgrace and a stain on humanity," Netanyahu said in a statement.

Understand that Iran has called for a summit of 120 nations non-aligned with pro-Israeli pursuits.  So much for Obama’s brand of reprisals and his ridiculous claim of being the most pro-Israeli president in history.  .  


Obama sends notices to the families of dead soldiers via form letters robo signed with an "electric pen." Geeeeesh.



<<<< 12 weeks after Obama was stupid enough to identify "Navy Seal Team Six" as the unit that killed Osama bin Laden,  17 members of that unit were among 30 killed as a transport copter was shot down by the Taliban.  



[This combo shows the 30 troops killed in a helicopter downing in Afghanistan on Saturday, Aug. 6, 2011. The Pentagon on Thursday, Aug. 11, 2011 identified the Americans as 17 members of the elite Navy SEALs, five Naval Special Warfare personnel who support the SEALs, three Air Force Special Operations personnel and an Army helicopter crew of five. (AP Photo)] Much of their story is told at CNS, here

The latest news tells us that the families of these men were sent notices from Obama that were nothing more than form letters,  auto signed by an electric pen.  In other words,  Barack Hussein Obama did not take a single second in dealing with these notifications,  apparently too busy playing gold,  shooting hoops with his buds,  or campaigning.  Read this story at Gatewaypundit.com.  This story broke two days ago when one of the families brought their letter to a tea-party assembly.  A little investigation and, walla,  we are all now aware of this sad,  sad, news.  You can click on this, the Denver Post,  for all 30 names with their pictures.  

Understand that while Obama did not play a role in the deaths of members of Seal Team Six and their patriot friends,  his announcement to the world 12/13 weeks prior,  gave the Taliban the ability to claim this incident as a revenge killing.  

Little wonder the military approval rating for this presidential impostor is 59/35 against his leadership.  

Save our soldier.  Vote Obama/Biden out of office. 





Paul Ryan's full speech in script. See the video in the following post. This speech is the primary summary of the GOP campaign talking points when it comes to a critique of all things Obama.


Mr. Chairman, delegates, and fellow citizens: I am honored by the support of this convention for vice president of the United States.

I accept the duty to help lead our nation out of a jobs crisis and back to prosperity – and I know we can do this.

I accept the calling of my generation to give our children the America that was given to us, with opportunity for the young and security for the old – and I know that we are ready.

Our nominee is sure ready. His whole life has prepared him for this moment – to meet serious challenges in a serious way, without excuses and idle words. After four years of getting the run-around, America needs a turnaround, and the man for the job is Governor Mitt Romney.

I’m the newcomer to the campaign, so let me share a first impression. I have never seen opponents so silent about their record, and so desperate to keep their power.

They’ve run out of ideas. Their moment came and went. Fear and division are all they’ve got left. 

With all their attack ads, the president is just throwing away money – and he’s pretty experienced at that. You see, some people can’t be dragged down by the usual cheap tactics, because their ability, character, and plain decency are so obvious – and ladies and gentlemen, that is Mitt Romney.

For my part, your nomination is an unexpected turn. It certainly came as news to my family, and I’d like you to meet them: My wife Janna, our daughter Liza, and our boys Charlie and Sam.

The kids are happy to see their grandma, who lives in Florida. There she is – my Mom, Betty.

My Dad, a small-town lawyer, was also named Paul. Until we lost him when I was 16, he was a gentle presence in my life. I like to think he’d be proud of me and my sister and brothers, because I’m sure proud of him and of where I come from, Janesville, Wisconsin. 

I live on the same block where I grew up. We belong to the same parish where I was baptized. Janesville is that kind of place.

The people of Wisconsin have been good to me. I’ve tried to live up to their trust. And now I ask those hardworking men and women, and millions like them across America, to join our cause and get this country working again.

When Governor Romney asked me to join the ticket, I said, “Let’s get this done” – and that is exactly, what we’re going to do.

President Barack Obama came to office during an economic crisis, as he has reminded us a time or two. Those were very tough days, and any fair measure of his record has to take that into account. My home state voted for President Obama. When he talked about change, many people liked the sound of it, especially in Janesville, where we were about to lose a major factory.

A lot of guys I went to high school with worked at that GM plant. Right there at that plant, candidate Obama said: “I believe that if our government is there to support you … this plant will be here for another hundred years.” That’s what he said in 2008.

Well, as it turned out, that plant didn’t last another year. It is locked up and empty to this day. And that’s how it is in so many towns today, where the recovery that was promised is nowhere in sight.

Right now, 23 million men and women are struggling to find work. Twenty-three million people, unemployed or underemployed. Nearly one in six Americans is living in poverty. Millions of young Americans have graduated from college during the Obama presidency, ready to use their gifts and get moving in life. Half of them can’t find the work they studied for, or any work at all.

So here’s the question: Without a change in leadership, why would the next four years be any different from the last four years?

The first troubling sign came with the stimulus. It was President Obama’s first and best shot at fixing the economy, at a time when he got everything he wanted under one-party rule. It cost $831 billion – the largest one-time expenditure ever by our federal government.

It went to companies like Solyndra, with their gold-plated connections, subsidized jobs, and make-believe markets. The stimulus was a case of political patronage, corporate welfare, and cronyism at their worst. You, the working men and women of this country, were cut out of the deal. 

What did the taxpayers get out of the Obama stimulus? More debt. That money wasn’t just spent and wasted – it was borrowed, spent, and wasted. 

Maybe the greatest waste of all was time. Here we were, faced with a massive job crisis – so deep that if everyone out of work stood in single file, that unemployment line would stretch the length of the entire American continent. You would think that any president, whatever his party, would make job creation, and nothing else, his first order of economic business. 

But this president didn’t do that. Instead, we got a long, divisive, all-or-nothing attempt to put the federal government in charge of health care.

Obamacare comes to more than two thousand pages of rules, mandates, taxes, fees, and fines that have no place in a free country. 

The president has declared that the debate over government-controlled health care is over. That will come as news to the millions of Americans who will elect Mitt Romney so we can repeal Obamacare.

And the biggest, coldest power play of all in Obamacare came at the expense of the elderly.

You see, even with all the hidden taxes to pay for the health care takeover, even with new taxes on nearly a million small businesses, the planners in Washington still didn’t have enough money. They needed more. They needed hundreds of billions more. So, they just took it all away from Medicare. Seven hundred and sixteen billion dollars, funneled out of Medicare by President Obama. An obligation we have to our parents and grandparents is being sacrificed, all to pay for a new entitlement we didn’t even ask for. The greatest threat to Medicare is Obamacare, and we’re going to stop it.

In Congress, when they take out the heavy books and wall charts about Medicare, my thoughts go back to a house on Garfield Street in Janesville. My wonderful grandma, Janet, had Alzheimer’s and moved in with Mom and me. Though she felt lost at times, we did all the little things that made her feel loved.

We had help from Medicare, and it was there, just like it’s there for my Mom today. Medicare is a promise, and we will honor it. A Romney-Ryan administration will protect and strengthen Medicare, for my Mom’s generation, for my generation, and for my kids and yours.

So our opponents can consider themselves on notice. In this election, on this issue, the usual posturing on the Left isn’t going to work. Mitt Romney and I know the difference between protecting a program, and raiding it. Ladies and gentlemen, our nation needs this debate. We want this debate. We will win this debate. 

Obamacare, as much as anything else, explains why a presidency that began with such anticipation now comes to such a disappointing close.

It began with a financial crisis; it ends with a job crisis.

It began with a housing crisis they alone didn’t cause; it ends with a housing crisis they didn’t correct.

It began with a perfect Triple-A credit rating for the United States; it ends with a downgraded America.

It all started off with stirring speeches, Greek columns, the thrill of something new. Now all that’s left is a presidency adrift, surviving on slogans that already seem tired, grasping at a moment that has already passed, like a ship trying to sail on yesterday’s wind.

President Obama was asked not long ago to reflect on any mistakes he might have made. He said, well, “I haven’t communicated enough.” He said his job is to “tell a story to the American people” – as if that’s the whole problem here? He needs to talk more, and we need to be better listeners? 

Ladies and gentlemen, these past four years we have suffered no shortage of words in the White House. What’s missing is leadership in the White House. And the story that Barack Obama does tell, forever shifting blame to the last administration, is getting old. The man assumed office almost four years ago – isn’t it about time he assumed responsibility?

In this generation, a defining responsibility of government is to steer our nation clear of a debt crisis while there is still time. Back in 2008, candidate Obama called a $10 trillion national debt “unpatriotic” – serious talk from what looked to be a serious reformer.

Yet by his own decisions, President Obama has added more debt than any other president before him, and more than all the troubled governments of Europe combined. One president, one term, $5 trillion in new debt.

He created a bipartisan debt commission. They came back with an urgent report. He thanked them, sent them on their way, and then did exactly nothing.

Republicans stepped up with good-faith reforms and solutions equal to the problems. How did the president respond? By doing nothing – nothing except to dodge and demagogue the issue.

So here we are, $16 trillion in debt and still he does nothing. In Europe, massive debts have put entire governments at risk of collapse, and still he does nothing. And all we have heard from this president and his team are attacks on anyone who dares to point out the obvious.

They have no answer to this simple reality: We need to stop spending money we don’t have.

My Dad used to say to me: “Son. You have a choice: You can be part of the problem, or you can be part of the solution.” The present administration has made its choices. And Mitt Romney and I have made ours: Before the math and the momentum overwhelm us all, we are going to solve this nation’s economic problems.

And I’m going to level with you: We don’t have that much time. But if we are serious, and smart, and we lead, we can do this.

After four years of government trying to divide up the wealth, we will get America creating wealth again. With tax fairness and regulatory reform, we’ll put government back on the side of the men and women who create jobs, and the men and women who need jobs.

My Mom started a small business, and I’ve seen what it takes. Mom was 50 when my Dad died. She got on a bus every weekday for years, and rode 40 miles each morning to Madison. She earned a new degree and learned new skills to start her small business. It wasn’t just a new livelihood. It was a new life. And it transformed my Mom from a widow in grief to a small businesswoman whose happiness wasn’t just in the past. Her work gave her hope. It made our family proud. And to this day, my Mom is my role model.

Behind every small business, there’s a story worth knowing. All the corner shops in our towns and cities, the restaurants, cleaners, gyms, hair salons, hardware stores – these didn’t come out of nowhere. A lot of heart goes into each one. And if small businesspeople say they made it on their own, all they are saying is that nobody else worked seven days a week in their place. Nobody showed up in their place to open the door at five in the morning. Nobody did their thinking, and worrying, and sweating for them. After all that work, and in a bad economy, it sure doesn’t help to hear from their president that government gets the credit. What they deserve to hear is the truth: Yes, you did build that. 

We have a plan for a stronger middle class, with the goal of generating 12 million new jobs over the next four years.
In a clean break from the Obama years, and frankly from the years before this president, we will keep federal spending at 20 percent of GDP, or less. That is enough. The choice is whether to put hard limits on economic growth, or hard limits on the size of government, and we choose to limit government.

I learned a good deal about economics, and about America, from the author of the Reagan tax reforms – the great Jack Kemp. What gave Jack that incredible enthusiasm was his belief in the possibilities of free people, in the power of free enterprise and strong communities to overcome poverty and despair. We need that same optimism right now.

And in our dealings with other nations, a Romney-Ryan administration will speak with confidence and clarity. Wherever men and women rise up for their own freedom, they will know that the American president is on their side. Instead of managing American decline, leaving allies to doubt us and adversaries to test us, we will act in the conviction that the United States is still the greatest force for peace and liberty that this world has ever known.

President Obama is the kind of politician who puts promises on the record, and then calls that the record. But we are four years into this presidency. The issue is not the economy as Barack Obama inherited it, not the economy as he envisions it, but this economy as we are living it.

College graduates should not have to live out their 20s in their childhood bedrooms, staring up at fading Obama posters and wondering when they can move out and get going with life. Everyone who feels stuck in the Obama economy is right to focus on the here and now. And I hope you understand this too, if you’re feeling left out or passed by: You have not failed, your leaders have failed you.
None of us have to settle for the best this administration offers – a dull, adventureless journey from one entitlement to the next, a government-planned life, a country where everything is free but us.

Listen to the way we’re spoken to already, as if everyone is stuck in some class or station in life, victims of circumstances beyond our control, with government there to help us cope with our fate.

It’s the exact opposite of everything I learned growing up in Wisconsin, or at college in Ohio. When I was waiting tables, washing dishes, or mowing lawns for money, I never thought of myself as stuck in some station in life. I was on my own path, my own journey, an American journey where I could think for myself, decide for myself, define happiness for myself. That’s what we do in this country. That’s the American Dream. That’s freedom, and I’ll take it any day over the supervision and sanctimony of the central planners.

By themselves, the failures of one administration are not a mandate for a new administration. A challenger must stand on his own merits. He must be ready and worthy to serve in the office of president.

We’re a full generation apart, Governor Romney and I. And, in some ways, we’re a little different. There are the songs on his iPod, which I’ve heard on the campaign bus and on many hotel elevators. He actually urged me to play some of these songs at campaign rallies. I said, I hope it’s not a deal-breaker Mitt, but my playlist starts with AC/DC, and ends with Zeppelin.

A generation apart. That makes us different, but not in any of the things that matter. Mitt Romney and I both grew up in the heartland, and we know what places like Wisconsin and Michigan look like when times are good, when people are working, when families are doing more than just getting by. And we both know it can be that way again.

We’ve had very different careers – mine mainly in public service, his mostly in the private sector. He helped start businesses and turn around failing ones. By the way, being successful in business – that’s a good thing.

Mitt has not only succeeded, but succeeded where others could not. He turned around the Olympics at a time when a great institution was collapsing under the weight of bad management, overspending, and corruption – sounds familiar, doesn’t it?

He was the Republican governor of a state where almost nine in ten legislators are Democrats, and yet he balanced the budget without raising taxes. Unemployment went down, household incomes went up, and Massachusetts, under Mitt Romney, saw its credit rating upgraded.

Mitt and I also go to different churches. But in any church, the best kind of preaching is done by example. And I’ve been watching that example. The man who will accept your nomination tomorrow is prayerful and faithful and honorable. Not only a defender of marriage, he offers an example of marriage at its best. Not only a fine businessman, he’s a fine man, worthy of leading this optimistic and good-hearted country.

Our different faiths come together in the same moral creed. We believe that in every life there is goodness; for every person, there is hope. Each one of us was made for a reason, bearing the image and likeness of the Lord of Life.

We have responsibilities, one to another – we do not each face the world alone. And the greatest of all responsibilities, is that of the strong to protect the weak. The truest measure of any society is how it treats those who cannot defend or care for themselves.

Each of these great moral ideas is essential to democratic government – to the rule of law, to life in a humane and decent society. They are the moral creed of our country, as powerful in our time, as on the day of America’s founding. They are self-evident and unchanging, and sometimes, even presidents need reminding, that our rights come from nature and God, not from government.

The founding generation secured those rights for us, and in every generation since, the best among us have defended our freedoms. They are protecting us right now. We honor them and all our veterans, and we thank them.

The right that makes all the difference now, is the right to choose our own leaders. And you are entitled to the clearest possible choice, because the time for choosing is drawing near. So here is our pledge.

We will not duck the tough issues, we will lead.

We will not spend four years blaming others, we will take responsibility.

We will not try to replace our founding principles, we will reapply our founding principles.

The work ahead will be hard. These times demand the best of us – all of us, but we can do this. Together, we can do this.

We can get this country working again. We can get this economy growing again. We can make the safety net safe again. We can do this.

Whatever your political party, let’s come together for the sake of our country. Join Mitt Romney and me. Let’s give this effort everything we have. Let’s see this through all the way. Let’s get this done.

Thank you, and God bless.

Video: A comprehensive summary of the campaing's talking points: Ryan's 38 minute speech at the RNC - He tears into Obama and does so with a little class. Thanks to C-Span


Wait for the video to load.  Pay no attention to the video commotion.  In seconds,  the C-Span video will appear.  






Susana Martinez, Governor of New Mexico. and her 18 minute excellent talk on Wednesday night


Sorry,  but listening to the commercial is worth  Governor Martinez speech.  


 

 

 

 

 

 

  video platform

  video management

  video solutions

  video player





Chuck Todd, speaking for MSNBC, walks back Chris Matthews.



See the video of Todd's statement  

After Chris Matthews went off on the Chair of the RNC, Reince Priebus,  yesterday,  an excellent example of ambush journalism  (Shep Smith at Fox sure knows what that is), Chuck Todd,  speaking somewhat officially (we assume).  tells the world,  "Chris Matthews is not reflective of MSNBC."  

I don't get it.  Matthews has the lowest ratings of any at MSNBC except, perhaps,  Al Sharpton,  yet,  the network continues to employ this intellectual stiff.  

Todd apparently has no clue what goes on at MSNBC when he is not in the studio.