The Dems are charging that Trump demanded an investigation into the Bidens, and in so doing , further the likelihood that he would win re-election.
But what if someone other than Joe Biden is chosen to run for President against Trump?
Obviously, there is no crime worthy of impeachment if someone else is chosen to run against him (Trump).
Of course, there was no investigation into the Bidens; there was no quid pro quo and all 12 witnesses before the Schiff lead House Committee agreed that there was actual quid pro quo. All were specifically asked about this, and, all agreed that no such event was in evidence. They were also asked about bridbery with the same results - - - i.e. "no bribery." Read the parts of each tanscribed testimoney at the point where the GOP representatitive spacifically asked about quid pro quo, or bribery or extortion and you will see that none of the 12 could give testimoney to the notion that the President was quilty of any of the above stated "crimes."
The House Bill for Impeachment:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/12/breaking-house-democrats-release-impeachment-report/
Also, 𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 GOP 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗳𝗳 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁:
1. President Trump has a deep-seated, genuine, and reasonable skepticism of Ukraine due to its history of pervasive corruption.
2. President Trump has a long-held skepticism of U.S. foreign assistance and believes that Europe should pay its fair share for mutual defense.
3. President Trump's concerns about Hunter Biden's role on Burisma's board are valid. The Obama State Department noted concerns about Hunter Biden's relationship with Burisma in 2015 and 2016.
4. There is indisputable evidence that senior Ukrainian govt officials opposed President Trump in 2016 and did so publicly. It has been reported that a DNC operative worked with Ukrainian officials, including the Ukrainian Embassy, to dig up dirt on then-candidate Trump.
5. The evidence does not establish that President Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate Burisma Holdings, Vice President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, or Ukrainian influence in the 2016 election for the purpose of benefiting him in the 2020 election.
6. The evidence does not establish that President Trump withheld a meeting with President Zelensky for the purpose of pressuring Ukraine to investigate Burisma Holdings, Vice President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, or Ukrainian influence in the 2016 election.
Also, 𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 GOP 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗳𝗳 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁:
1. President Trump has a deep-seated, genuine, and reasonable skepticism of Ukraine due to its history of pervasive corruption.
2. President Trump has a long-held skepticism of U.S. foreign assistance and believes that Europe should pay its fair share for mutual defense.
3. President Trump's concerns about Hunter Biden's role on Burisma's board are valid. The Obama State Department noted concerns about Hunter Biden's relationship with Burisma in 2015 and 2016.
4. There is indisputable evidence that senior Ukrainian govt officials opposed President Trump in 2016 and did so publicly. It has been reported that a DNC operative worked with Ukrainian officials, including the Ukrainian Embassy, to dig up dirt on then-candidate Trump.
5. The evidence does not establish that President Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate Burisma Holdings, Vice President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, or Ukrainian influence in the 2016 election for the purpose of benefiting him in the 2020 election.
6. The evidence does not establish that President Trump withheld a meeting with President Zelensky for the purpose of pressuring Ukraine to investigate Burisma Holdings, Vice President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, or Ukrainian influence in the 2016 election.
7. The evidence does not support that President Trump withheld U.S. security assistance to Ukraine for the purpose of pressuring Ukraine to investigate Burisma Holdings, Vice President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, or Ukrainian influence in the 2016 election.
8. The evidence does not support that President Trump orchestrated a
shadow foreign policy apparatus for the purpose of pressuring Ukraine to
investigate Burisma Holdings, Vice President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden,
or Ukrainian influence in the 2016 election.
9. The evidence does not support that President Trump covered up the
substance of his telephone conversation with President Zelensky by
restricting access to the call summary.
10. President Trump's assertion of longstanding claims of executive
privilege is a legitimate response to an unfair, abusive, and partisan
process, and does not constitute obstruction of a legitimate impeachment
inquiry.
So Candidate Bloomberg will not allow negative reports on his own campaign, only on the Trump campaign. Here is what Trump is doing about this bit ofr hypocrisy:
Trump Campaign Will No Longer Credential Bloomberg News Reporters
Make no mistake, this kind of action is directed against all of the partiotic nation, period. If you believe that the war against Trump is only about Trump, you really have not been paying attention or, even worse, you do not care.
The Founders created the 1st Amendment to prevent this kind of action by the richand powerful so don't tell me that the Democrat Party cares about liberty or free speech or a fair political process.
300+ Trump Ads Taken Down By Google, YouTube
This is the very reason why the Founders made their first amendment to the Constitution about free political speech.
This is their agenda. All denials or "clarifications" to the contrary are nothing more than the series of lies told to hide their true course of action for a nation they did not create, for a nation they truly despise, for a Middle Class/Blue Collar constituency (70 - 80 million or more) they have ridiculed and hated since Viet Nam.
The plan of the modern-day subversive? To simply ignore our founding principles and documents, write their own agenda, use the U.N. and its treatise to circumvent our own legal and foundational documents, continue to legislate against our own national sovereignty, use any and all causes for the transfer of American wealth to those nations that, for the most part, hate us, criminalize or otherwise enslave the millions who disagree, and move on with their version of "a brave new world."
The good news? To date, elections still matter despite Progressive rejection of the 2016 election. Our federal court systems still work when properly balanced, and the Gallup poll still finds that our nation leans more to the Right than the pegan media wants us all to believe.
Why aren't we surprsised? Its been goiing on since before Reagan.
Understand that there is no other explanation for this kind of crap other than the corporate media is nothing more than a propaganda outlet using our search for "news" as bait.
Media Pulls UN Report After Finding Record-High Child Detentions Took Place Under Barack Obama not Trump (Video)
The Indiginous people in the New World were not land owners; they were nomads; so cut the crap.
Failed NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick trashed the United States on
“Unthanksgiving Day,” accusing the United States of having “stolen”
billions of acres of land from “Indigenous people.”
A nomad is a member of a community of people without fixed habitation who regularly move to and from the same areas, including nomadic hunter-gatherers, pastoral nomads, and tinker or trader nomads. As of 1995, there were an estimated 30–40 million nomads in the world. Wikipedia
A nomad is a member of a community of people without fixed habitation who regularly move to and from the same areas, including nomadic hunter-gatherers, pastoral nomads, and tinker or trader nomads. As of 1995, there were an estimated 30–40 million nomads in the world. Wikipedia
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)