I am not a Trump fan BUT, this pictures should freighten the opposition.
Donald Trump went to Lowell, Mass.
— a town about five miles south of the New Hampshire border — for one
of his now trademark big-arena rallies on Monday night. This is what the
crowd looked like per WaPo's Jenna Johnson. Neither Hillary nor Obama have seen such crowds in recent times . . . . . . . Hillary, never.
Update: Obama's gun control executive action: A lot of a-do over next to nothing, seriously.
Update
Editor's notes: (After his noon address) Here is what Obama cannot do . . . . write legislation. And making it a criminal offense for a father to give his three sons his gun collection on penalty of a felony conviction is something that he cannot do. That scenario is one of the affects of his proposition presented to day. More than this, nothing he proposes deals with the problem he hates, and that is a gun in the hands of a murderer.
He asked this question: "There was a time when the gun lobby believed in expanded background checks . . . what happened?" Answer: Obama happened. He has acted on his own too many times. He has taken new law and subverted to his own liking without Congressional approval too many times. THAT'S what happened. Nobody trusts the man. Remember all the lies he personally told when trying to get ObamaCare passed into law? Most of the nation does, and it is unforgivable.
My question: Why did he wait until now to come up this? Seven years and this the best he could do? Good grief. Understand that this morning was all about headlines, period. Chicago, New York City, Washington D.C, L.A., Ferguson, Baltimore, Oakland, Sandy Hook . . . . . none of the above would have been affected IN THE SLIGHTEST. But again, why did he wait until his presidency is over? Answer: (Obviously) To feed red meat to his voting base. No one "in the know," believes that the Dems will have a turn-out the size of either of Obama's elections, and that is sending chills up the spin of Democratic strategists.
________________________
Expand background checks to include all gun dealer customers.
Background checks especially for those buying military style weapons.
Hire more agents to enforce existing gun laws
Hire enough additional agents to investigate/approve background checks 24/7.
Invest $500,000 in efforts to deal with mental health issues.
Source: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/01/04/fact-sheet-new-executive-actions-reduce-gun-violence-and-make-our
That's it. There is nothing to worry about here, If there is something illegal in this (I missed it) , the courts will shut it down as they have on 57% of the cases appearing before our Court System.
Editor's notes: (After his noon address) Here is what Obama cannot do . . . . write legislation. And making it a criminal offense for a father to give his three sons his gun collection on penalty of a felony conviction is something that he cannot do. That scenario is one of the affects of his proposition presented to day. More than this, nothing he proposes deals with the problem he hates, and that is a gun in the hands of a murderer.
He asked this question: "There was a time when the gun lobby believed in expanded background checks . . . what happened?" Answer: Obama happened. He has acted on his own too many times. He has taken new law and subverted to his own liking without Congressional approval too many times. THAT'S what happened. Nobody trusts the man. Remember all the lies he personally told when trying to get ObamaCare passed into law? Most of the nation does, and it is unforgivable.
My question: Why did he wait until now to come up this? Seven years and this the best he could do? Good grief. Understand that this morning was all about headlines, period. Chicago, New York City, Washington D.C, L.A., Ferguson, Baltimore, Oakland, Sandy Hook . . . . . none of the above would have been affected IN THE SLIGHTEST. But again, why did he wait until his presidency is over? Answer: (Obviously) To feed red meat to his voting base. No one "in the know," believes that the Dems will have a turn-out the size of either of Obama's elections, and that is sending chills up the spin of Democratic strategists.
________________________
Expand background checks to include all gun dealer customers.
Background checks especially for those buying military style weapons.
Hire more agents to enforce existing gun laws
Hire enough additional agents to investigate/approve background checks 24/7.
Invest $500,000 in efforts to deal with mental health issues.
Source: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/01/04/fact-sheet-new-executive-actions-reduce-gun-violence-and-make-our
That's it. There is nothing to worry about here, If there is something illegal in this (I missed it) , the courts will shut it down as they have on 57% of the cases appearing before our Court System.
Democrat Campaign myth #347: Bill Clinton is a real asset to the Hillary Campaign. (So why did she wait until now?)
Think, the two most popular presidents in modern times, if you believe Progressive propaganda, are Bill Clinton and Obama Hussein.
Indeed, the Marxist Media gives them very high marks, year after year. And where has that gotten the party?
Under Clinton, he lost both the House and the Senate and watched as 75% of those whom he has supported, over the years, fail in their campaign bids.
Obama Hussein? Well, he took the party from its strongest time, in 2009, to its lowest in nearly 100 years and may be facing a catastrophic election cycle in 2016.
So much for popularity. Someone tell Hillary, "bring it own."
Indeed, the Marxist Media gives them very high marks, year after year. And where has that gotten the party?
Under Clinton, he lost both the House and the Senate and watched as 75% of those whom he has supported, over the years, fail in their campaign bids.
Obama Hussein? Well, he took the party from its strongest time, in 2009, to its lowest in nearly 100 years and may be facing a catastrophic election cycle in 2016.
So much for popularity. Someone tell Hillary, "bring it own."
They don't make a video about Trump until after Hillary gives them directions to do so.
Raheem Kassam / Breitbart:
After The Trump Terror Vid, Can We Start Calling Her ‘Al Shabaab Media Advisor Hillary Clinton’?
So who is the domestic enemy, here, Trump or Hillary ?
So who is the domestic enemy, here, Trump or Hillary ?
Washington Times gives us a short list of Obama's failed presidency:
- The Obama-Clinton “reset” with Russia . . . and Moscow’s subsequent invasion of Ukraine and bombing of our Syrian-rebel allies.
- Years of inaction on Syria — including the humiliating retreat from enforcing Obama’s “red line” against chemical weapons . . . which opened the door for the rise of ISIS.
- The total US pullout from Iraq . . . leaving the government to ally with Iran, alienate the Sunni minority and collapse when ISIS invaded.
- Intervening in Libya to help oust the Khadafy regime . . . then abandoning the nation to civil war, chaos and new terrorist camps.
- Drastic reductions in the US military, so that the drawdowns in Europe and the Middle East left no forces to add as Obama supposedly “pivoted” to Asia.
- An easing of relations with Cuba that gave the Castros much of their wish list — even as their crackdowns on dissent continue unabated.
- A surge-with-an-expiration-date in Afghanistan that’s left the Taliban in better shape there than it’s been since 2001 — with al Qaeda back and ISIS now in the mix, too.
- A nuclear “understanding” with Iran that gives Tehran hundreds of billions in fresh income, while maybe delaying its nuclear program a decade — and leaves all America’s traditional Mideast allies believing Washington no longer has their backs . . .
Source: http://nypost.com/2016/01/02/president-obamas-bizarro-world-victory-tour/
And Trump has no appreciation for Scalia. You should know this before you vote the man.
associated Press:
SCALIA DISMISSES CONCEPT OF RELIGIOUS NEUTRALITY IN SPEECH
— METAIRIE, La. (AP) — Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia says the
idea of religious neutrality is not grounded in the country's
constitutional traditions and that God has been good to the U.S. exactly
because Americans honor him.
Myths exposed about the Left's gun-control propaganda:
Stats you should know before entering into a discussion about gun control: of the 33,000 gun deaths per year, 65% are suicides and 33% are the result of gangland shootings. That's 98% of our gun death problem, folks. What's left, your ask ? Death by cop, accidental deaths and mass killings not related to suicide or gang warfare.
Now, about those myths:
1. For starters, the gun show "loophole" can only be closed via legislation on a governmental level (county, state, or, federal). Obama cannot close this supposed loophole via executive order.
I am not aware of any mass shootings or gangland killings coming from guns purchased at our gun shows . . . . . . . none.
Here in California, home of the San Bernardino mass murder by radicalized Muslims, state legislation requires all gun purchases, whether on line or via gun shows, be secured by a registered gun dealers . . . . . . . period. The guns used in San Bernardino were ALL registered. The buyers were given a background check. The murdering biotch who came from the Middle East passed through an Obama visa/background check and was approved by the Obama government.
Most authorities speaking out on the murder(s), argue that she readicalized her husband. So, if we are thinking about legislation needed to prevent mass murder via radical jihad, maybe we should actually try to keep radical Islam from infiltrating our society.
We might start with visa reform that is meaningful. Secondly, it would be good to expel the Muslim Brotherhood from the Obama Hussein's White House. Finally, we should put CAIR back on the FBI's terror watch list . . . . . . you know, the same list they were on before Obama brought his "occupy D.C." styck to Washington.
In other words, without federal controls opposing violent Islam, we cannot win the war we are in with radical Islam.
2. As relates to gun control versus our inter-city terror organizations (you might know them better as our cities' gangland population), understand that virtually all gang members fail background checks. Virtually all their guns are illegal. Let me say that again: "Virtually all gangland gun possession is illegal." The problem? We do not have enough jail space for these killer punks; we do not have any serious, large scale "social justice" programs, and, even if we did, our gangs are so violent that social justice ministers and their families are threatened, killed, or harassed into leaving the inner city to itself.
3. I am not opposed to universal background checks, as along as it via legislation, and the Central Government has nothing to do with its enforcement. Enforcement should be a local, county or state function. Understand that California cannot keep tabs on the guns/rifles it has registered. If the state cannot keep track of its registered gunowner population, the feds have no chance.
One of my son's in law, had two rifles stolen out of his truck (he is a diary man) . When he reported the loss, he found out that all his registration paper work had been destroyed by the state, six months after he purchased the guns. The state only keeps records on handguns, and, probably does not do a good job of that.
4. Finally an armed citizenry is the best protection against gun violence. Many if not most, police and sheriff organizations agree.
More than that, think about this fact: why are there no mass school shootings in our inner cities? Two reasons: some of our inner schools have strict inspections for the student body, each and every day; but more than that, if pat-downs (physical or electrical) are not in force, potential mass killers know that much of the inner-city student body is "packing heat." The wrong place to be, if you are a shooter, is in an inner-city school filled with gang members.
Now you know.
Now, about those myths:
1. For starters, the gun show "loophole" can only be closed via legislation on a governmental level (county, state, or, federal). Obama cannot close this supposed loophole via executive order.
I am not aware of any mass shootings or gangland killings coming from guns purchased at our gun shows . . . . . . . none.
Here in California, home of the San Bernardino mass murder by radicalized Muslims, state legislation requires all gun purchases, whether on line or via gun shows, be secured by a registered gun dealers . . . . . . . period. The guns used in San Bernardino were ALL registered. The buyers were given a background check. The murdering biotch who came from the Middle East passed through an Obama visa/background check and was approved by the Obama government.
Most authorities speaking out on the murder(s), argue that she readicalized her husband. So, if we are thinking about legislation needed to prevent mass murder via radical jihad, maybe we should actually try to keep radical Islam from infiltrating our society.
We might start with visa reform that is meaningful. Secondly, it would be good to expel the Muslim Brotherhood from the Obama Hussein's White House. Finally, we should put CAIR back on the FBI's terror watch list . . . . . . you know, the same list they were on before Obama brought his "occupy D.C." styck to Washington.
In other words, without federal controls opposing violent Islam, we cannot win the war we are in with radical Islam.
2. As relates to gun control versus our inter-city terror organizations (you might know them better as our cities' gangland population), understand that virtually all gang members fail background checks. Virtually all their guns are illegal. Let me say that again: "Virtually all gangland gun possession is illegal." The problem? We do not have enough jail space for these killer punks; we do not have any serious, large scale "social justice" programs, and, even if we did, our gangs are so violent that social justice ministers and their families are threatened, killed, or harassed into leaving the inner city to itself.
3. I am not opposed to universal background checks, as along as it via legislation, and the Central Government has nothing to do with its enforcement. Enforcement should be a local, county or state function. Understand that California cannot keep tabs on the guns/rifles it has registered. If the state cannot keep track of its registered gunowner population, the feds have no chance.
One of my son's in law, had two rifles stolen out of his truck (he is a diary man) . When he reported the loss, he found out that all his registration paper work had been destroyed by the state, six months after he purchased the guns. The state only keeps records on handguns, and, probably does not do a good job of that.
4. Finally an armed citizenry is the best protection against gun violence. Many if not most, police and sheriff organizations agree.
More than that, think about this fact: why are there no mass school shootings in our inner cities? Two reasons: some of our inner schools have strict inspections for the student body, each and every day; but more than that, if pat-downs (physical or electrical) are not in force, potential mass killers know that much of the inner-city student body is "packing heat." The wrong place to be, if you are a shooter, is in an inner-city school filled with gang members.
Now you know.
Stopping to pray several times a day, during work hours? Well, when 190 employees do it, it threatens the existence of the company.
Denver Post:
About 190 workers, mostly Somali, were let go after they left the meatpacking line to protest changes to prayer policy
— Somali immigrant Halimo Ahmed places her cut on the fastpaced belt
during her shift in manufacturing at Cargill Meat Solutions in Fort
Morgan. (Joe Amon, The Denver Post file)
Why I do not care for Ted Cruz. The headline in our post is the reason.
Michelle Fields / Breitbart:
Sen. Ted Cruz Tells Volunteers: We Can Win 'If We Awaken And Energize The Body Of Christ"
Editor's notes: we already have a president who places one religion over another. While preacher might say what is said in the headline, the candidate simply cannot. Bush was a Christian and not ashamed to say so . . . . but he did not run on his faith.
Editor's notes: we already have a president who places one religion over another. While preacher might say what is said in the headline, the candidate simply cannot. Bush was a Christian and not ashamed to say so . . . . but he did not run on his faith.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)