More proof of the utter hoax that is "globull" warming

44 share

Figure 1. RSS monthly global mean lower-troposphere temperature anomalies (dark blue) and trend (thick bright blue line), September 1996 to May 2014, showing no trend for 17 years 9 months.

The hiatus period of 17 years 9 months (showing little or no global warming - editor) is the farthest back one can go in the RSS satellite temperature record and still show a zero trend. But the length of the pause in global warming, significant though it now is, is of less importance than the ever-growing discrepancy between the temperature trends predicted by models and the less exciting real-world temperature change that has been observed . . .   text taken from Watts Up With That.  

Editor’s notes:  In order words,  using satellite records going back as far as those records exist,  there has been no rise in the global averages for temperature. 


This is not the conclusion of a right-wing nutjob.  No,  not at all,  unless,  of course,  one thinks the satellite date is the handiwork of a vast,  Rightwing conspiracy.  

Mad Magazine makes fun of Obama with this faux Movie Banner. When the Left starts laughing at you, you know you are in trouble, but, maybe, Obama thinks it a compliment.

26 share 

For the record, Bowe Bergdahl's Idaho, hometown, just canceled its planned parade and welcome home celebrations. Too bad for the family, but you sometimes get what you deserve. (no article)

38 share

Maybe you should take four and a half minutes and listen to this CNN interview of Bergdahl's army mate: And to think, the Administration is prepared to call his army buds, "Liars."

32 share
 There is no way we can prove Bergdahl was feeding the enemy information,  but,  that he was a deserter,   is a certainty.   


Is a cover-up beginning to evolve as the Administration fails to see developing firestorm over its decision to give aid to the enemy during combat, with leadership reinforcements to the Taliban, via the Bergdahl hostage deal? Here is part of the answer.

60 shares
The answer to our headlined question is, "Yes."  But, more than this and because we are talking about H Obama,  the more correct answer is,  "Yes,  of course."  Chuck Todd,  a reporter out of NBC,  made the following news,  at MSNBC.  Not only is the Administration preparing its defense, it will attempt to make the debate about "swift boating" the young Sargent/deserter.  The accusations of Kerry's own Swift Boat unit told the nation of his lies,  in a successful effort to derail his presidential campaign.  Their comments were true,  back than,  and the accusations of those in Boew Bergdahl's unit, today,  are equally true.  But,  at least we know the direction of this cover-up, # 17, for this Administration.  

Washington Examiner:   White House aides have accused members of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl’s unit of “swift-boating” the 28-year-old Idahoan for claiming that he deserted his post in Afghanistan nearly five years ago, MSNBC’s Chuck Todd reported.

“I’ve had a few aides describe it to me as ‘we didn’t know that they were going to swift-boat Bergdahl’,” Todd said Wednesday.


The term “swift-boating” comes from 2004 when members of then-Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry’s Swift Boat unit came forward during the election to accuse him of misleading American voters about his service in Vietnam.

Even the Far Left cannot abide Obama's decision to surrender to the will of the enemy.

23 share

U.S. NEWS

 
06.04.14

The Hero Who Died Looking for Bowe Bergdahl


Lt. Darryn Andrews left a pregnant wife and son behind when he saved six fellow soldiers at the expense of his own life. But his family never knew his true mission—until now.
When he saw the Taliban fighter pop up and prepare to fire a rocket-propelled grenade, Lt. Darryn Andrews could have saved himself by diving for cover. . . . . . “Second Lieutenant Andrews fatally placed himself between the incoming enemy fire and his fellow comrades. His courage under fire was essential in saving another Soldier’s life, and saving the lives of five other Soldiers who were with him.”
By the official count, Andrews had saved a total of six fellow soldiers at the expense of his own life.
And that remarkable number makes it only more outrageous that the U.S. Army lied to Andrews’s family after his death. . . . . The Andrews family was told the truth by soldiers who had served with Andrews, including the sergeant he had saved by pushing him from harm’s way in his final living instant.
The soldiers further informed the family that they had been ordered not to reveal their true mission, lest it complicate the hunt for Bergdahl. They even had been forced to sign nondisclosure agreements  . . .   you will definitely want to finish this article,  found, here, at The Daily Beast.  

Editor's notes;  Interestingly to this Conservative Patriot and partisan,  I have lived long enough to realize there are those on the Left,  even the far Left,  who have a respect for what is right and wrong,  especially in such circumstances as the Bergdahl mess.  I do not believe "they" (the Liberal press) are motivated,  exclusively,  by politics.  Certainly,  in this situation, there was no need,  for example,  for the leftis, Daily Beast,  to honor Lt. Andrews,  and tell the truth Bergdahl,  beginning with a cover-up that began years ago.  

Why the cover-up began years before his "rescue," will be part of the discussion over the next few weeks, if not months into the future.  As for me,  I believe that Bowe Bergdahl's disappointment with the Afghan war,  stated in emails to friends and family,  was agreeable to Obama from the very beginning.  When this deserting soldier made this a political issue,  in his emails,  he appealed to the more critical concerns of this Administration.  

This controversy is not going way.  Why?  Because there is no other action,  short of a soldier firing on his own,  that is held in greater contempt,  than desertion.  Besides the 2010 military report finding Bergdahl to have been a deserter,  we have the members of his own battlefield unit,  6 of whom died,  trying to bring him back,  men who know what happened,  and, appear ready to talk about it.  

Understand that when Leftist apologists say,  "No one knows what really happened,"  they are simply lying.  There are plenty of folks who know,  six of them, now,  dead,  including Lt Andrews.  

Hats off to The Daily Beast,  for telling the truth and giving honor to whom honor is due.  

Sympathizing State Department girl spokesman sets up Administration defense on their prisoner exchange.

37 share
Update #1:  Fox News has just reported (8 am pt,  June 4) that the Administration had decided to pursue a prisoner exchange,  in December of 2013.  This news  makes its claim that this decision was made because of revelations within the past two weeks, showing Bergdahl's health as failing, to be only part of hack-kneed cover-up  --  something this Administration seems to enjoy pursuing.  

It is incredible that Obama and the Kerry/Hillary State Department was so unaware or miscalculating,  as to the Qatar allegiance against the US,  American opinion,  the opposition of our intelligence community (all 16 agencies),  and noteworthy Democrats including the likes of Diane Feinstein.  We know,  for a fact,  as an aside to the Fox storyline,  that Obama had it in his mind to trade GITMO prisoners for Bergdahl,  since 2011,  and was rebuffed in bi-partisan style,  for this opinion  (see that story, here, at the NY Daily News).    


In the video,  Fox News reporter Lucas Tomlinson asks, “Does the State Department consider Sergeant Bergdahl to be a deserter?” 

State Department girl spokesman:   “The State Department — no, Lucas. Look, what we’ve said is we are going to learn the facts about what happened here.   He’s been in captivity, Lucas. I think he’s probably the person who knows best what happened on that night,” 

Editor's note:  Never mind the fact that the military did a review,  back in 2010,  in which it found Bergdahl to have deserted his post,  in the dark of night.  

Tomlinson:   “Well, I think his squad mates have the best indication what happened that night.”

State Department girl spokesman:  “I don’t think that that’s the case,” Harf responded.


Editor's notes:  There is reason to believe that the Congressional law,  passed in 2012 and signed by Obama, requiring the president to give 30 day notice to Congress of its intentions to trade prisoners for hostages,  is not constitutional.  Having said that,  understand that it is the law,  unless and until it is challenged and over-turned in Federal Court.  Did Obama violate this law.  Of course.  Does he care?  Of course not.  


But more than this,  Obama did what no other president has done  -  deal with the enemy, making a hostage exchange,  during wartime.  What makes this historic failure even worse,  is the fact that he gave the enemy exactly what it wanted,  the release of the 5 top Taliban leaders in American custody.  This is not the first time this president has surrendered to the enemy.  In March of 2012,  he paid 5 million dollars for the release of 7 American hostages captured by the Muslim Brotherhood (or related) rebels in Egypt.  The American Press did not cover this story and its historic fact is or will be completely lost,  as a matter of the passing of time.  That Obama is a Muslim sympathizer is well beyond question,  and this prisoner exchange is more proof of that reality.  

Before any choose to disagree,  consider Obama's words to the UN,  on September 18, 2012,  just days following the Muslim murder of our Ambassador,  in Benghazi:  "The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam"  (a murderer in his own rite).  Or,  his pledge to the Muslim World,  found in his book,  The Audacity of Hope  (p261):  "I will stand with the Muslims  . . . . ."  Or, his Cairo speech to the Muslim world,  in which he praised Islam for being a "religion of tolerance" while making it clear that he believed Israel was the "occupier" in its conflict with the PLO.  

Understand, that Obama has never embraced a "victory" strategy for Afghanistan,  preferring to work for a "negotiated peace"  (reader "surrender") with the Taliban,  a move emphatically rejected by this band of killers.  Expect more of the same,  as Obama stands above the law,  and,  even,  members of his own party,  working on behalf of the Muslim community,  as he has throughout his presidency.  



Just to be clear: Obama is our first president to orchestrate a trade of enemy combatants for an United States soldiers. That has never happened before.

41 share
He also paid 5 million as "bail money" for the freedom of 7 American hostages held by Muslim Brotherhood terrorists,  in Egypt.  Call it what you will.  In this case,  the US,  under Obama,  agreed to pay the 5 million in exchange for these prisoners.  Since there was no trail in sight,  "bail" is only a part of the word games played by this Administration.  Read the story at Fox News.

Apparently, Obama believes no one can stop him as to his unilateral, imperialist, unConstitutional conduct. Here are 16 headlines exposing the national outrage as to Obama's latest illegal actions, adding to the demise of his presidency.


42 share
<<<  . . .   because he cannot accomplish his personal goals any other way.  

Qatar allowing released Taliban men to move freely in country...
No one ever believed that Qatar would put the 5 Taliban killers in custody.  Instead,  it allowed them to be treated as heros and their release as a victory. 
Reintegration: Military hides Bergdahl from public view...
This is not "reintegration."  Rather,  the proper term is "stonewalling."
FLASHBACK: 'Converted to Islam And Taught Captors Bomb Making Skills'...
We don't know if Bergdalh offered bomb building instruction,  but there will be an investigation,  unless,  of course,  Obama is successful in controlling the military's investigation,  as he was with the Fort Hood terrorist.
NYT: Left note explaining desertion before going AWOL...
Bergdahl revealed his disappointment in the US and the Afghan War,  before he left the base,  in the middle of the night.
REPORT: Wanted to Renounce Citizenship...
There is at least one email that, reportedly,  has this soldier thinking of this action.
Team Leader: 'A lot more to story than soldier walking away'...
It is the team leader and members of Bowe Bergdahl's own military unit that [may] blow the lid off this cover-up.
Death sentence 'in the realm of possibilities'...
The question,  then,  is, "Why now?" and to what cost?
14 SOLDIERS WERE LOST Searching for Bergdahl...
I do not believe this number has been established as fact.  The accepted number of soldiers lost in their search for the missing soldier is six.
Never Officially Listed as POW...
White House apologizes for 'oversight' in notification failure...
White House is under fire with members of its own security agency and those in Democrat leadership who had gone on record rejecting such a trade,  last year.
FATHER: 'I am still working to free all Guantanamo prisoners'...
Words from the father of Bowe Bergdahl.  We should not disparage the thinking of the mentally handicapped.
MAG: White House Overrode Internal Objections To Terrorist Release...
This headline stands on its own.  Obama now knows that his goals as "president/national and world reformer,"  are not going to fulfilled.  As a result,  he has decided to act on his own.  We should all understand that regulations and executive orders are temporary,  and reversable without Congressional review or agreement.  The King of Smoke and Mirrors has been reduced to smoke and mirrors.  
'Suck it up and salute'...

Rubio: Obama 'Believes He's Become Monarch Or Emperor'...
Anger explodes...

For the record: Our soldiers disapprove of Obama as Commander to the tune of 78% and, the Bergdahl matter, is one of his more unpopular military decisions.

33 share

Here is Sec of Defense,  Hagel,  a Republican and aproven "yes man" to this Administration,  delivering the good news of Bowe Bergdahl's negotiated trade for five Taliban dedicated to killing Americans,  once they get back on the battlefield.  Just to be clear,  what you are looking at, is stone silence as Hagel delivers his "good news."    While a picture is often worth a 1000 words,  this sort of silence is deafening