Three minutes in the life of a black pastor as he expresses disappointment in Obama's secular position on gay marriage.


Make no mistake,  Barack Obama has crossed the line within the Black community when it comes to his stance on gay marriage. 

Tony Evans denies that this is a civil rights issues and does a fine job of defending the Christian perspective.  Obama has no clue when it comes to the Christian point of view and has never participated in the civil rights movement,  at any level. 

His “change of mind” is much more a departure than a change,  and it will cost him votes in both the Black community and the Hispanic constituency. 


In 2008, Obama won by a margin of 7 points and 43% of the white vote. Today, we may be looking at a 40/60 split


Romney has a 20-point advantage among white voters.  Obama is supported by 91% of black voters and 57% of other minority voters.

This stat, alone,  spells doom for Barack Obama.  In 2008,  74% of the 130 people voting,  were white people.  Obama carried 43% of these folks and McCain carried 55%. A difference of 13 percent. 

McCain lost the popular election by a margin of 9.5 million folks.  If the GOP picks up an additional 7 points in the white community,  it might see as many as 6.5 million votes added to the 2008 total and,  if these are swing voters – and a huge number will be “swing” – Obama has already lost 2012 election.  Understand that a 9.5 million margin is a swing of 4.75 million. 

Obama, playing chicken with military layoffs, may see the issuance of one million pink slips just before we decide his fate as president for a second term.



<<< There is question as to the application of the law,  but employers may have to serve notice to those who loose their jobs if sequestration kicks in on January 2. Nearly one million notices might be sent out 4 days before the November elections  --  a disaster for Obama.  

Obama and the Democrats have decided to play “chicken” with raising taxes on the rich only,  versus massive cuts to the military complex,  $500 billion on top of the $400 billion in cuts from the military over the past two years.  Thinking they had the GOP “over a barrel,”  the Dems and Obama have refused to negotiate  . . . . .  that is  until sometime yesterday.

As it turns out,  the cuts to the military will demand huge layoffs.  There are regulations under the WARN Act  that require 60 day notice prior to these layoffs  - one for each military personnel whose job will be terminated.  That means pinks slips would be required no later than November 2, four days before the November elections.  There could be as many as one million notices sent out immediately before the election.

In panic,  the Administration,  Monday (July 30),  sent out a memo stating that pink slip notification was not required by law  in a desparate effort to prevent this massive notification process.  Problem:  it appears that if notice is not given and layoffs occur, those suddenly without work can file against their employers.  The collective cost of this lawsuit would be prohibitive. 

Senator James Inhofe, of Oklahoma,  has charged that the Administration is using intimidation tactics to keep employers from issuing these notices, telling them that this particular issue of job termination is not included in the WARN Act directives. 

Time will tell which side is believed.  If the employers do not wish to open themselves to any number of lawsuits,  “pink” will be the color of the day.  If Obama and his minions convince employers that notification is not needed,  Obama escapes a devastating moment just before the 6th.  


Update: it appears to this editor that Obama is on the wrong side of the issue.  In an article written earlier this month,  we have this quote regarding the problem: 



Welcome to the politics of the WARN act. A sequestration delay had been growing in popularity to free up more time to find a comprehensive solution to the problem (including broader tax reform) and now to avoid the inconvenient timing of WARN act notifications.  The Republican position is now simple: either find a one year “fix” to the 2013 sequestration cuts — preferably soon, but in lame duck session if necessary — or else sequestration goes into effect January 2. . . .  Source: an  American Enterprise Institute article found here. 

_____________________

Guidelines for application of the WARN Act can be found here.  

Milton Friedman, the father of conservative economic theory, destroys Obamanomics in this 2.5 minute video discussion. You have to sit and listen.


Obama's position and that of every bleeding heart on the Left,  every redistributionist that ever lived is stated in the opening question of this short discussion:  

"When you see around the globe,  the mal-distribution of wealth, the desperate plight of millions of people in underdeveloped countries, when you see so few haves and so many have nots, when you see greed and the concentration of power  . . . .  did you ever have a moment of doubt about capitalism and whether greed is a good idea to run on." - Phil  Donahue


Friedman responds and the beginnings of the Obama "fairness" doctrine, put into play years before Obama was a known quantity,  is brought to its knees by the older and wiser man, Milton Friedman.    




Elizabeth Warren, a Harvard theorist, simplifies a very complicated economic picture.

 Without even hinting at how she would pay for solution,  Warren demonstrates  what is wrong with the Big Government model on economic recovery and the Democrat Party.  



Understand that Warren will criticize Bush for spending too much while,  at the same time,  talk about spending more and more and more.  Apparently she believes the decision to spend money on infrastructure,  a state by state responsibility, is a simple one,  a question of will and nothing else.  

Never mind the fact that Central Government borrows 42% of each dollar its spends on anything.  Never mind that we pay for this deficit in borrowed money. 
How we fund our deficit? 
Over the past four years,  Obama has run a yearly deficit of more than 1.3 trillion dollars, on average,  compared to Bush and his $510 billion average deficit  -  nearly two thirds less than Obama.  We pay for all this by increasing our receipts from  China,  Japan, Republic of Ireland, Singapore, Thailand, Mexico, India, Turkey, South Korea, Norway, France and Israel, Chile, Sweden, Philippines and Colombia, the sale of Treasury Bills and the reallocation of revenues ( collected taxes ) such as the reassignment of Medicare receipts and Social Security.  Understand that “reallocation” is a fancy word for “theft,”  the Central Government taking paycheck deductions designated for Medicare and Social Security and spending  those funds for other programs.   Over the years,  this spending idiocy has put Social Security 19 trillion in the hole with the Boomers coming into its purview at the rate of 10,000 per day for the next 14 years and Medicare, 39 trillion in the hole. 

Warren, a theorist, sees no limits to borrowing money
When Warren glibly talks about spending money on infrastructure,  she is talking about the continuation of paycheck graft,  borrowing from ourselves (T-Bills),   begging from those nations outside our boundaries in perpetuity and the blatant misappropriation of paycheck receipts  . . . . and she makes it sound so simple. 

It is doomsday, financially,  and Warren is either unaware of that fact,  or simply does not understand the seriousness of the situation. 


Our total debt compared to world's combined economies
Our gross debt including Social Security and Medicare is more than the combined economies of the entire world  -  68 trillion dollars.  Yes,  if you add up the annualized budgets of every nation in this world,  that would total 68 trillion ---  our total indebtedness exceeds this amount. 


Even moderate Republicans understand the problem. 
Her opponent is Scott Brown.  He understand what is happening.  Let’s hope against reality that Massachusetts voters will see the importance of commonsense and fiscal responsibility.   


Another Federal Court decision against the Obama Administration. This time is was against his so-called "Department of Justice."

Remember these two Ignorants,  posing as tough guys instead of mere racist punks?  Well,  they did not show for their scheduled trial and were convicted of charges related to this scene on November 4 of 2008, and were found guilty because of their absence.   


*******
Turns out that Holder, the newly appointed head of "Justice,"   vacated this prosecution in following a policy of refusing to prosecute Blacks, in general,  on charges of voter fraud.  In our second video,  below,  Holder, in testimony before the House,   challenged comparisons of voter suppression in the South in the 1960's (and before) with the actions of the two Black Panthers in Philadelphia, and, in so doing,  demonstrated a certain dismissiveness with regard to the Black Panther incident.  It is as if he was saying (under his breath),  


"You think this was bad,  it was nothing as to what my people went through for decades,  in the South . . . this is get even time as to voter suppression,  folks!!"


An assistant prosecutor in the DOJ,  under Eric Holder, Christian Adams,   interviewed with Megyn Kelly (an 8 minute segment)  as to the extent of the prosecutorial misconduct within the DOJ. Adams resigned in protest.  In the interview,  he argued that the voting booth is "sacred" and leveled this shocking charge:
" . . . there is a hostility in the . . . .civil rights division [of the DOJ] to bringing cases on behalf of white victims for the benefit of national racial minorities . . . . that is a fact. . ."



Today,  after all the talk,  all the cover-up,  all the black bias driven garbage coming from our Department of Justice,   a Federal DC Judge ruled that Obama's  Department of Justice did,   in fact,  interfere with the prosecution of two New Black Panther party members after they were filmed outside a Philadelphia polling place in 2008  intimidating voters. This is something the Justice Department has denied up to this point. 

More from the Washington Examiner:

The ruling came as part of a motion by the conservative legal watch dog group Judicial Watch, who had sued the DOJ in federal court to enforce a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents pertaining to the the New Black Panthers case. Judicial Watch had secured many previously unavailable documents through their suit against DOJ and were now suing for attorneys’ fees.

From the judge: The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials’ representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making.



Romney still ahead, nationally, by 3 points. He has been "up" more than "down" against Obama.


Even the promise of "Hope" has failed. Only 14% of today's population believe their children will have a better America, in the future. (no article).



Obama's campaign now channels Clinton's successes, will feature Bubba at the National Convention and intends to claim Clinton's record as his own.



<<<<  Yes, that's Hillary.

Former President Bill Clinton told CNBC Tuesday (June 5) that the US economy already is in a recession and urged Congress to extend all the tax cuts due to expire at the end of the year.

In a taped interview aired on "Closing Bell," the still-popular 42nd president called the current economic conditions a "recession" [cnbc explains]and said overzealous Republican plans to cut the deficit threaten to plunge the country further into the debt abyss. (Clinton's office released a statement after the interview).
"What I think we need to do is find some way to avoid thefiscal cliff, to avoid doing anything that would contract the economy now, and then deal with what's necessary in the long term debt-reduction plans as soon as they can, which presumably would be after the election," Clinton said.
Hillary as a Saul Alinsky disciple.
"They will probably have to put everything off until early next year," he added. "That's probably the best thing to do right now. But the Republicans don't want to do that unless he agrees to extend the tax cuts permanently, including for upper income people, and I don't think the president should do that. . . . ."



Voters trust former President Bill Clinton over President Barack Obama and GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney when it comes to managing the economy, a Rasmussen Reports poll finds.

A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 55 percent of likely U.S. voters trust Clinton’s judgment on the economy more than Obama’s, while 26 percent trust Obama's judgment more. . . . .
 

The Era of Small Government
By Tom Shoop     February 5, 1997

A year after declaring that the era of big government had ended, President Clinton gave an outline of the smaller, more limited federal government he envisions for the 21st century in his State of the Union message last night.
The President listed a wide-ranging set of new initiatives in his address, from flextime for all American workers to guaranteeing that every child be able to log on to the Internet by age 12. Indeed, Clinton argued, "the enemy of our time is inaction."
But few of the initiatives Clinton proposed involved the federal government in a direct role. Even when the President issued a call for a "national crusade for educational standards," he hastened to add that he meant, "not federal government standards, but national standards . . . . . "

Jan 20th, 1997  -  Clinton's inauguration speech featured these words,  in full contradiction to anything stated by Obama:  "Today we can declare: Government is not the problem, and government is not the solution. We—the American people—we are the solution. Our founders understood that well and gave us a democracy strong enough to endure for centuries, flexible enough to face our common challenges and advance our common dreams in each new day.9
  As times change, so government must change. We need a new government for a new century—humble enough not to try to solve all our problems for us, but strong enough to give us the tools to solve our problems for ourselves; a government that is smaller, lives within its means, and does more with less. . . [LINK]



Obama's first broken campaign promise? To follow McCain/Feingold campaign laws. Here is his second promise and it applies today.


Why "angst" is the chosen emotion of the day, here at Midknight Review.



<<< Your friendly editor

On rare occasions,  I have an attack of civility.  Some coming to this site have complained with regard to my “name calling “  and harsh rhetoric.    About the time I begin rethinking my polemic style of writing,  a story such CNN's assault against Sarah Palin comes along,  presenting us, once again,  with the organic hatefulness that is the Left's regard for anything "conservative" or "traditional." 

Understand this:  they started this “current” round of incivility back when Goldwater ran against LBJ. Johnson was the first Democrat Jerk (in modern times) to resort to outright lies and name calling.  He and his socialist cronies (you should know that all “big government folks” are viewed as “socialist”  by this editor)** successfully convinced the nation that Goldwater and the GOP wanted to take down Social Security just before they took this nation into a nuclear nightmare.  They published an ad campaign with Goldwater in the foreground and a rising nuclear cloud over one of his shoulders.  Crap.  All of this was pure crap.  Goldwater lost the 1964 election in a landslide.  And,  New Democrats continue use the same strategies to this day,  including the nonsense about Social Security and, even, the threat of nuclear war from time to time. 

All this took place 24 years before Rush Limbaugh and his agenda,  offering “equal time” to the liberal controlled media.  Understand that before 1988,  all that was available to the conservative population were the three “major” networks.  That is an absolute fact.  “We” had nothing to balance the scales except the sheer stupidity of the Left (i.e. a Jimmy Carter or a Walter Mondale campaign versus Reagan or Dukakis and that silly photo-op  riding in his tank). 

What I am saying is this,  before the advent of Rush and the Patriot Media,  there was no dissenting voice to the national liberal/Marxist media . . .  none.  The national political conversation had been hijacked by LBJ.  

When I say, “They started it,”  I am serious and the point is demonstrably provable.  It is a fact.

 It was out of this era – before Limbaugh - that the Marxist Media took the position that they had the responsibility to vett our national candidates.  Can you imagine,  those who believe in a One World community being in charge of vetting those who believe in the Foundational Principles of this great nation? 
I was very much alive,  back in that day  -  a freshman in high school in 1959 and the campaign of John Kennedy.  While I was too young to vote,  his candidacy caught my young imagination.  

Today,  Kennedy would be silenced,  his conservative stance forced to the background.  His inaugural statement,   one of the most famous of all time,  would never be a campaign issue nor hold a place in the Democrat politic of this day: 

Ask not what this country can do for you;  ask what you can do for your country “  

is a statement diametrically opposed to the Obama,  post-modern, presidency. 

Which brings me to the primary complaint embraced in this post: 


Remember last November when Congresswoman Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) was disgracefully greeted  with the song "Lyin' Ass Bitch" during her appearance on NBC's Late Night with Jimmy Fallon?  Well,  the liberal degenerates have struck again. 

For some reason,  over the weekend,  CNN “News” thought it worthy of its reputation to play “Stupid Girls”  as a backdrop for a story on Sarah Palin and her decision to publically support Chick-Fil-A. 

And my motivation to “fight fire with fire” is invigorated. “They” started this word fight,  decades ago,  and the Right is determined to finish this battle.   
____________________

** "Socialism" in this case,  is the incremental advancement of the socialist agenda.  Understand that with "incrementalism,"  there is no particular point in time when one can argue the charge of "socialism" given the definition:  socialism - government control and ownership of all aspect of the societal economic. Here at Midknight Review - new and revised,  those who move us in this direction are, indeed, "socialist,"  whether by intent or by design.  

In June the Obama Government increased its purchases from GM by 70%.



Fox News reports that the Obama Government increased its auto purchases from GM by a disturbing 70% in the month of June.  

GM stock is down, again,  selling for a nominal $18 per share.  GM's IPO was set at $33 per share and the Feds need a stock price of $53 or more,  to break even.  

Understand that Obama's bet on Chrysler failed,  that company being purchased by the German company,  Fiat,  at a loss of 1.5 billion dollars to the taxpayer.  

At current trends,  GM will fail,  sometime at the November elections.  


Update: 
New headline: 

GM Ramps Up Risky Subprime Auto Loans To Drive Sales...


Why is Obama doing this?  Because his auto company is losing its "but , ,  it ain't true" with his craftiness at cooking the books.  

Obama increases GM auto purchases for the government by 70%

Shares selling for 18 per share down from an IPO of 33 dollars and a "break even" return on the 46 billion "invested" in GM by the CEO wannabe, Barack Obama.  

The media is touting good news for Chrysler sales.  Never forget,  that Obama sold Chrysler, in toto, to the German company,  Fiat, at a loss to taxpayers of 1.5 billion.  The profits for Chrysler are not related to this Administration but watch reporters forget this fact and give credit to Obama,  nonetheless.  Fox News did this, this morning.  

Google has flagged Midknight Review but gives it a clean bill of health.


What is the current listing status for dailycaller.com?
Site is listed as suspicious - visiting this web site may harm your computer.
Part of this site was listed for suspicious activity 3 time(s) over the past 90 days.
What happened when Google visited this site?
Of the 1308 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 0 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2012-07-30, and suspicious content was never found on this site within the past 90 days.Malicious software includes 2 trojan(s).
Malicious software is hosted on 1 domain(s), including scsperformance.net/.
This site was hosted on 30 network(s) including AS14383 (VCS)AS209 (QWEST)AS36089 (OPENX).
Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware?
Over the past 90 days, dailycaller.com did not appear to function as an intermediary for the infection of any sites.
Has this site hosted malware?
No, this site has not hosted malicious software over the past 90 days.
How did this happen?
In some cases, third parties can add malicious code to legitimate sites, which would cause us to show the warning message.
Next steps:

Want proof of the change within the Democrat Party? Read JFK's Inaugural Address.



 <<<<<   Want proof of the change withing the Democrat Party?  Read JFK's Inaugural Address.  Obama and his cohorts would never craft such a speech --- and have not. The difference?  JFK believed in the sovereignty and inherent goodness of this country as defined by its Founders.  Obama does not.  


"Ask Not What Your Country Can Do For You"
John F. Kennedy's Inaugural Address, January 20, 1961


[red highlights are mine,  of course,  and mark those statements and comments never used by the New Democrat Party of our day - blog editor]

We observe today not a victory of party, but a celebration of freedom — symbolizing an end, as well as a beginning — signifying renewal, as well as change. For I have sworn before you and Almighty God the same solemn oath our forebears prescribed nearly a century and three quarters ago.

The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe — the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God.
We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans — born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage — and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this Nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world.

Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty.

This much we pledge — and more.
To those old allies whose cultural and spiritual origins we share, we pledge the loyalty of faithful friends. United, there is little we cannot do in a host of cooperative ventures. Divided, there is little we can do — for we dare not meet a powerful challenge at odds and split asunder.

To those new States whom we welcome to the ranks of the free, we pledge our word that one form of colonial control shall not have passed away merely to be replaced by a far more iron tyranny. We shall not always expect to find them supporting our view. But we shall always hope to find them strongly supporting their own freedom — and to remember that, in the past, those who foolishly sought power by riding the back of the tiger ended up inside.

To those peoples in the huts and villages across the globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, for whatever period is required — not because the Communists may be doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right. If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.

To our sister republics south of our border, we offer a special pledge — to convert our good words into good deeds — in a new alliance for progress — to assist free men and free governments in casting off the chains of poverty. But this peaceful revolution of hope cannot become the prey of hostile powers. Let all our neighbours know that we shall join with them to oppose aggression or subversion anywhere in the Americas. And let every other power know that this Hemisphere intends to remain the master of its own house.
To that world assembly of sovereign states, the United Nations, our last best hope in an age where the instruments of war have far outpaced the instruments of peace, we renew our pledge of support — to prevent it from becoming merely a forum for invective — to strengthen its shield of the new and the weak — and to enlarge the area in which its writ may run.

Finally, to those nations who would make themselves our adversary, we offer not a pledge but a request: that both sides begin anew the quest for peace, before the dark powers of destruction unleashed by science engulf all humanity in planned or accidental self-destruction.

We dare not tempt them with weakness. For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed.   But neither can two great and powerful groups of nations take comfort from our present course — both sides overburdened by the cost of modern weapons, both rightly alarmed by the steady spread of the deadly atom, yet both racing to alter that uncertain balance of terror that stays the hand of mankind's final war.

So let us begin anew — remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof. Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate.   Let both sides explore what problems unite us instead of belabouring those problems which divide us.   Let both sides, for the first time, formulate serious and precise proposals for the inspection and control of arms — and bring the absolute power to destroy other nations under the absolute control of all nations.   Let both sides seek to invoke the wonders of science instead of its terrors. Together let us explore the stars, conquer the deserts, eradicate disease, tap the ocean depths, and encourage the arts and commerce.  Let both sides unite to heed in all corners of the earth the command of Isaiah — to "undo the heavy burdens -. and to let the oppressed go free."

And if a beachhead of cooperation may push back the jungle of suspicion, let both sides join in creating a new endeavour, not a new balance of power, but a new world of law, where the strong are just and the weak secure and the peace preserved. [this statement was why I was a young democrat]

All this will not be finished in the first 100 days. Nor will it be finished in the first 1,000 days, nor in the life of this Administration, nor even perhaps in our lifetime on this planet. But let us begin.

In your hands, my fellow citizens, more than in mine, will rest the final success or failure of our course. Since this country was founded, each generation of Americans has been summoned to give testimony to its national loyalty. The graves of young Americans who answered the call to service surround the globe.

Now the trumpet summons us again — not as a call to bear arms, though arms we need; not as a call to battle, though embattled we are — but a call to bear the burden of a long twilight struggle, year in and year out, "rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation" — a struggle against the common enemies of man: tyranny, poverty, disease, and war itself.
Can we forge against these enemies a grand and global alliance, North and South, East and West, that can assure a more fruitful life for all mankind? Will you join in that historic effort?

In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shank from this responsibility — I welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavour will light our country and all who serve it — and the glow from that fire can truly light the world.

And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country.

My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.

Finally, whether you are citizens of America or citizens of the world, ask of us the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of you. With a good conscience our only sure reward, with history the final judge of our deeds, let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God's work must truly be our own.

Fastest Production Car in the World (?)

260 mph /  0 - 60 in 2.4  - 2012 version


Final Bugatti Veyron Sold (Official): 2011 Bugatti Veyron Super Sport First Drive

Top eight stories of the week at Midknight Review - New and Revised.

<<<< The editor with one of his daughters, celebrating the old man's 67th birthday.  

Top articles for the 8,000 plus readers, this week:


Update: make that nine articles:  Obama has declared war on Chick-fil-A (?)    with more than 950 hits


Original text:
Reasons for the Midnight Massacre in Colorado ? I have at least eleven possibilities. See what you think. The number one story,  for some reason,  was my rant regarding assessed blame for the Colorado Massacre, a terrible event for which the killer and the killer alone,  is responsible  -  not guns or the movie or the UPS or . . . . . .   More than 900 folks seem to agree

Racism, anti-capitalism and post-modern black hatred for whites is discussed in this article.  LINK.  Story was one of our most popular,  all,  time with more than 700 hits at the time of this writing.

Romney sets the record straight on a number of points designed by Obama to misinform: all about Bain Capital    . .  .312 found this article an important bit of information.  

We make quick mention of an NBC/WSJ poll in which Obama is deemed "6 points ahead of Romney" in this poll,  a survey that interviewed 11% more Democrats than Right leaning folks.  When you stop to think about it,  Romney won the poll.  LINK .  295 folks landed on this article,  this past week. 

Obama is first president ever to argue that Americans give up their constitutional liberties when they enter the world of regulated business. LINK.  Story had 290 hits at time of ranking.

You join 280 other readers for the week,  in reviewing this article. 


American gays,  a militant wing of the New Democrat Party (one of many), has set out to destroy another business.  Almost no one in the NDP believes in free speech and this is, yet, another example of that fact.  LINK.  Story had 180 hits.




The wheels are coming off the Obama Express.


Romney is facing attacks from Obama for his taxes,  Bain Capital,  his flap with the Brits over Olympic security preparations,  his supposed “war against women.” 

Obama’s problems are much more serious, but are not being reported by his Compliant Media. 

Most recently,  there is the NBC/WSJ poll that gave Obama a 6 point lead while interviewing 11% more Democrats than conservatives . . . . in other words,  Romney won that poll.

Obama’s popularity within the military has fallen to a 59/35 split with his “approval” rating being the lower total,  an embarrassing divide for one who masquerades as the Commander In Chief.

Middle Class blue collar white men’s support for Obama has fallen from 36% in 2008,  to 26% today,  a record low mark for a Democrat candidate.  Walter Mondale  in a loss to Reagan back in '88,  scored a 31% approval rating just before the election and won only one state plus the District of Columbia.  98 million Americans voted in that election. Mondale won just 40 million of that total.  Obama is on pace to duplicate the Mondale defeat.

Obama was caught in a lie regarding the Churchill Bust.  That story was reported here.  The Brits proved him wrong, in this case.

Obama was caught in a lie regarding his “Dreamer Act.”  That story was reported here.  The Border Patrol and ICE proved him wrong,  in this instance.

He claimed that his economic plan worked,  in one of the most bizarre lies of the campaign.  The workforce is smaller than before he took office.  There are fewer jobs available that before.  

More people are out of work than in June of 2009.  

His “8.2%” unemployment percentage is a phony number.  It does not count the 8 million Americans who are no longer looking for work, folks who have given up entirely,  If we count those folks,  as we did in 2009,  the unemployment rate would be a whopping 11.3% .   Unemployment has not gone down at all and more and more voters are being made aware of this fact.

The business community disapproves of Obama 59 to 36 percent  -  another record low,  a disparity that will not be repaired before the election. 

This past week, we learned that  enthusiasm for his campaign compared to the patriot community,  leans Right by a margin of 51 to 39 percent  -  another devastating stat.

On Bain Capital,  a full 60% believe Romney’s defense.

His argument that others worked as hard as the successful business owner,  that others contributed more to the owner’s success than the effort of the owner,  himself,  that “If you got a business,  you didn’t build that;  somebody else did that,”  that argument found 73% of the nation disagreeing with the wannabe businessman,  Barack Hussein Obama.