Haystack 37-meter radio telescope with a cutaway view of it in its radome. |
And, after all these years of looking and hoping and dreaming, scientists have found only four possible planets. The closest is one called 667Cc. It is four times the size of earth, but is the right distance from its sun, so, of course, there is life somewhere on that planet, right??
I know, the thinking is this: we need to find younger planets just in case our system goes up in smoke. "Humans" need somewhere to go when the Sun decides to light things up, in our solar system.
Problem: 667Cc is 22 light years from here. And that's the good news. Some star systems are billions of light years from Earth. Good news is always balanced out by bad news, it seems, and that is true in this instance.
In case you are planning on traveling to 667Cc anytime soon, you had better pack a mean lunch. Understand that a "light year" is 5,865,896,000,000 or [in this case] 5.865 trillion miles from here, and that is one light year. If we could travel at a mile a second (3,600 miles per hour) and not run out of fuel, our new home-away-from-home would be millions of years from here.
Which brings us to another issue - no telling what we would look like when we got there. Let's assume the fantasy of evolution as being true and tie that to the apparent "fact" that Mankind as we know "him" to be, is just 145,000 years old. Of course, I do not believe in evolutionary trends for species larger than a centimeter, but most scientists do. My next question, then, is an important one: million years from now, what life form would step out onto that New World's stage? If we are going to look anything like my neighbor's mother-in-law, it ain't worth the expense, trust me.
Point of post: if the Sun decides to die, we are all sooooo screwed and we are all so very much alone.
No comments:
Post a Comment