FYI: As is my policy, I will wait to give a full report on the "transcrpt" events of the morning . . . . too many claims to "facts" at this point, too many to sort through. Here is what we know at this moment:

Update:  according to Bret Baier (Fox News)  we now know more than what was known by the whistleblower.  

FYI: As is my policy,  I will wait to give a full report on the "transcript" events of the morning  . . . .   too many claims to "facts" at this point,  too many to sort through.

Suffice it to say that there was no quid pro quo requests/demands from the President as there was in the Biden statement ("fire the prosecutor or we will withhold 1.2 billion dollars in federal aid to Ukraine").

We also know that the manuscript/transcript was the end result of 4 or 5 Intel agents and their transcriptions as the phone call was taking place, not the result of listening to a recording of the phone call.  Turns out that recordings are not made of such international conversations  . . . .   true for all Presidents.

It will be soon forgotten,  but the concern of the Inspector General as parroted by the Dems,  was based on the transcription process as represented in this post.  No one listend to or complained about the phone call to Ukraine based on a recording of said phone call and "no one" includes the I.G. andor any Democrat opponent of the President.

I doubt that I will add to this post before tomorrow or the following day  ~  editor