Benghazi Lies Began With Obama and Hillary?
When
the complete history is written of the 2012 terrorist attack in
Benghazi, Libya, the dishonesty and duplicity of the Obama White House
will be an inescapable fact. As we celebrate Independence Day, Americans
ought to be disturbed about the ethical quality of the men and women in
high office. The signers of the Declaration of Independence would
surely be aghast at the unethical, lawless leadership in Washington,
D.C.
However,
I'd like to think the Founders would be happy with the vigilance and
persistence of Judicial Watch in holding our government leaders
accountable for their misdeeds.
To that end, this week we released new State Department documents
showing that Hillary Clinton and the State Department's response to the
Benghazi attack was immediately determined by top Obama White House
officials, particularly Ben Rhodes, then-White House deputy strategic
communications adviser, and Bernadette Meehan, a spokesperson for the
National Security Council. The new documents were forced from the State
Department under court order in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit.
A September 11, 2012, email
sent at 6:21 p.m. by State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland to
Meehan, Under Secretary for Management Patrick F. Kennedy, and Clinton's
personal aide Jacob Sullivan, shows that the State Department deferred
to the White House on the official response to the Benghazi attack.
Referencing pending press statements by Barack Obama and Clinton, Nuland
wrote: "We are holding for Rhodes clearance. BMM, pls advise asap."
Meehan responded three minutes later, at 6:24 p.m.: "Ben is good with these and is on with Jake now too."
Rhodes sent an email
at 9:48 p.m. to senior White House and State officials on the issue:
"We should let the State Department statement be our comment for the
night."
An email
from Meehan, sent at 10:15 p.m. on September 11 to Rhodes, Nuland,
Sullivan, Kennedy and Clinton aide Philippe Reines, further confirms the
White House approval of Hillary Clinton's statement tying the Benghazi
terrorist attack to an Internet video: "All, the Department of State
just released the following statement. Per Ben [Rhodes'] email below,
this should be the USG comment for the night."
The
"USG comment" turned out to be Clinton's notorious public statement,
made hours after the initial terrorist attack, falsely suggesting that
the Benghazi assault was a "response to inflammatory material posted on
the Internet."
Rhodes emailed
Meehan, Sullivan and Reines at 11:45 p.m. on September 11, writing,
"Fyi - we are considering releasing this tonight." The next line is
redacted. The email also included a "Readout of President's Call to
Secretary Clinton," the contents of which are also completely redacted.
On
September 12, the day after the attack, Meehan sent an email to Obama
administration officials announcing that "to ensure we are all in sync
on messaging for the rest of the day, Ben Rhodes will host a conference
call for USG communicators on this chain at 9:15AM ET today."
Think
about this timeline. Obama and Hillary Clinton talk. The White House
along with State then composes and issues Hillary Clinton's statement
falsely tying the Internet video to the attack. We can't find any other
government documents other than Hillary's statement that September 11,
2012, night tying the attack to the video. This all leads me to conclude
that Hillary Clinton originated the video lie in partnership with the
Obama White House. And I'm willing to bet that the phone call earlier
between Clinton and Obama set the whole lie in motion. As I told Fox News
this week, if the details of the call were helpful, the details would
be released. As they're being kept secret, one can assume the details of
the Obama-Clinton call are damning.
As
if the new White House bombshells weren't enough, the new documents
show that the Obama administration engaged domestic and foreign Islamist
groups and foreign nationals to push the Internet video narrative.
The day after the attack, Rashad Hussain, the Obama administration's special envoy to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation
(OIC), sent an email to Ambassador Ufuk Gokcen, the OIC's ambassador to
the United Nations, and Cenk Uraz, an official with the OIC, pushing
the video as the cause of the Benghazi attack. The OIC is supported by
57 nations and purports to be "the collective voice of the Muslim
world." The OIC is no friend of freedom and is an apologist for terrorism,
to put it charitably. So this pernicious international body is, of
course, a key ally for the Obama Benghazi disinformation campaign. The
Obama envoy's email has the subject line: "Urgent: Anti-Islamic Film and Violence" and reads in part:
I
am sure you are considering putting a statement on the film and the
related violence. In addition to the condemnation of the disgusting
depictions, it will be important to emphasize the need to respond in a
way that is consistent with Islamic principles, i.e. not engaging in
violence and taking innocent life ...
The resulting OIC statement,
sent to Hussain by the OIC's Uraz, linked the film, as requested by the
Obama administration, to the Benghazi attack and suggested that the
United States restrict free speech in response. The official OIC
statement called the film "incitement" and stated that the attack in
Benghazi and a demonstration in Cairo "emanated from emotions aroused by
a production of a film had hurt [sic] the religious sentiments of
Muslims. The two incidents demonstrated serious repercussions of abuse
of freedom of expression." The OIC's statement referenced its own
efforts to criminalize criticism
of Islam. Hussain sent the OIC statement immediately to other Obama
administration officials, including then-Clinton chief of staff Cheryl
Mills, who thanks Hussain for the email.
The
State Department withheld communications on September 12, 2012, between
Hillary Clinton's senior aide Huma Abedin and Rashad Hussain about an
article passed by him about how "American Muslim leaders" were tying the
video to the Benghazi attack. At the time of the Benghazi attack,
Abedin had been double-dipping, working as a consultant to outside
clients while continuing as a top adviser at State. Abedin's outside
clients included Teneo, a strategic consulting firm co-founded by former
Bill Clinton counselor Doug Band. According to Fox News, Abedin earned $355,000 as a consultant for Teneo, in addition to her $135,000 "special government employee" compensation.
There's more:
The
State Department also disclosed a document, dated September 13, 2012,
entitled "USG Outreach and Engagement Post Benghazi Attack." This record
details how the Obama administration reached out to domestic groups,
foreign groups and governments in a full-court press to tie the video to
the Benghazi attack. The document "captures USG efforts
to engage outside voices to encourage public statements that denounce
the attack make it clear that the anti-Muslim film does not reflect
American [sic]." The document highlights the use of Hillary Clinton's
statement tying the terrorist attack to an Internet video. The
"outreach" document also highlights "Special Envoy's engagement" with
the OIC and the "Saudi Ambassador."
The
documents show that the Internet video was raised in a September 15
discussion between Hillary Clinton and Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet
Davutoglu. The "eyes only" "secret" document
was partially declassified. Davutoglu "called the controversial
anti-Islam video a 'clear provocation,' but added that wise people
should not be provoked by it." The next line is blacked out and the
markings show that it will not be declassified until 2027, more than 12
years from now.
Another email,
evidently from the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), sent to
Meehan and other top White House and administration officials, shows
that the administration took no action to deploy military assets almost
five hours after the attack begun:
OSD
has received queries asking if military assets are being sent to either
location [Libya and Egypt]. Have responded "not to our knowledge."
The State Department referred Judicial Watch
to documents in the batch of 55,000 emails allegedly turned over by
Hillary Clinton and searched in response to the court order in this
lawsuit. These emails were published on the State Department's web site,
but are also available here. In addition, the State Department produced
new documents containing Hillary Clinton emails. In one such email
(September 11, 2012, at 11:40 p.m.) from Clinton to Nuland, Sullivan and
top Clinton aide Cheryl Mills, with the subject line "Chris Smith,"
Clinton writes: "Cheryl told me the Libyans confirmed his death. Should
we announce tonight or wait until morning?"
Nuland
responds: "We need to ck family's druthers. If they are OK, we should
put something out from you tonight." Mills then replies to Nuland,
"Taking S [Secretary of State Hillary Clinton] off." (Sean Smith, not
"Chris Smith" was one of four Americans killed at Benghazi.)
On September 13, 2012, Politico's Mike Allen sent then-National Security Council Spokesman Tommy Vietor
an Independent.co.uk news article entitled "America was warned of
embassy attack but did nothing." The story reported that "senior
officials are increasingly convinced" the Benghazi attack was "not the
result of spontaneous anger." Vietor forwarded the story to other top
White House and State Department officials, but Vietor's accompanying
comments and the comments of other top Obama appointees are completely
redacted. The administration also redacted several emails of top State
officials discussing a statement by a Romney campaign spokesman
criticizing the "security situation in Libya."
In April 2014, Judicial Watch first obtained smoking-gun documents
showing that it was the Obama White House's public relations effort
that falsely portray the Benghazi consulate terrorist attack as being
"rooted in an Internet video, and not a failure of policy."
The documents include an email
by White House operative Ben Rhodes sent on Friday, September 14, 2012,
with the subject line: "RE: PREP CALL with Susan, Saturday at 4:00 pm
ET." This "prep" was for Ambassador Susan Rice in advance of her
appearances on Sunday news shows to discuss the Benghazi attack and
deflect criticism of the administration's security failures by blaming
the attack on spontaneous protests linked to the video.
The email listed as one of the administration's key talking points:
"Goal": "To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure or policy."
So the goal is not to tell the truth. Just so we're clear on that much.
What we have uncovered in just the past few days is part of a larger continuum.
Documents
released by our team last month further confirm that the Obama
administration, including Hillary Clinton, Rice and Obama immediately
knew the attack was an al-Qaeda terrorist attack.
These
latest documents show the Obama White House was behind the big lie,
first promoted by Hillary Clinton, that an Internet video caused the
Benghazi terrorist attack. Top White House aide Ben Rhodes, Hillary
Clinton and many key Obama officials pushed others, including Islamist
terror allies, to tie the Internet video to the attacks. How disturbing
it is that the Obama administration would use Islamist radicals to push
the false Benghazi story in a way that would abridge free speech. It is
little wonder that Mrs. Clinton and the entire Obama administration have
fought so hard to keep these documents from the American people. All
evidence now points to Hillary Clinton, with the approval of the White
House, as being the source of the Internet video lie.
Obama
and Hillary Clinton failed the nation, and most terribly, U.S.
Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and U.S. Foreign Service Information
Management Officer Sean Smith, who were both killed in the Benghazi
terrorist attack on September 11, 2012. Several hours after the initial
assault, a second terrorist attack took place targeting a different
compound located just one mile away. Two CIA contractors, Tyrone Woods
and Glen Doherty, were killed in this second attack and 10 others were
injured. The Obama gang failed those two heroes, as well.
We
aim to vindicate them and that's why we are happy to do the work of an
AWOL Congress, media and federal bureaucracy in ferreting out the truth
about this continuing scandal.
No comments:
Post a Comment