Here is a window into Hillary's sworn/written testimony . . . testimony that claims ignorance as the primary answer to her questioning. Personally, I think she nailed it. I can see . . . . .

  Here is a window into Hillary's sworn/written testimony  . . .   testimony that claims ignorance as the primary answer to her questioning.  Personally,  I think she nailed it.  I can see "ignorance" as an all encompassing explanation for the totality of Hillary's record of public service, so yes,  "ignorance" works.

Here are a few of Hillary's answers to questions asked by Judicial Watch (see the JW link,  below):  

Question #3 :  "She does not recall any specific consultations regarding [her] decision to use the clintonemail.com account for official State Department business."

Question #4:  "Secretary Clinton states that she does not recall participating in any communications before or during her tenure as Secretary of State concerning or relating to her decision to use a clintonemail.com account to conduct official State Department business. "

Editor: If she can't recall,  we could claim that she made this decision on her own, in opposition to consultation and she would have to say,  "That is possible since I do not recall."  Understand that she did not "recall" when answering the vast majority of the written questions submitted by Judicial Watch.  Who knows,  maybe this is evidence,  in and of itself,  that she really did receive a brain injury when she fell and hit her head last year (remember,  she was treated for a concussion). 
 

Question #5:   "Secretary Clinton states that former Secretary of State Colin Powell advised her in

2009 about his use of a personal e-mail account to conduct official State Department business." 

Question # 6:  Secretary Clinton states that she does not recall being advised, cautioned, or warned, she does not recall that it was ever suggested to her, and she does not recall participating in any communication, conversation, or meeting in which it was discussed that her use

of a clintonemail.com e-mail account to conduct official State Department business conflicted with or violated federal record keeping laws. 

Question #7:  Secretary Clinton states that she does not recall considering factors other than convenience in deciding to use a personal e-mail account to conduct official State Department business.

Question # 8:  Secretary Clinton does not recall whether she had a specific expectation that the State Department would receive FOIA requests for or concerning her e-mail.

Editor:  Seriously?  She had no clue that she would receive Freedom of Information Act requests when every agency in government receives such requests. Look,  this is the same woman who wants you to believe that the Secretary of State did not receive any classified mail  . . . .  none   . . . . . .  as Secretary of State  . . . . .  a position that deals with international issues and private but official communications from world leaders,  military personnel,  operatives in the field,  communications from the FBI,  the CIA,  the DOJ,  the ATF and on and on.  This woman either pretends to grossly inept,  or she is abject a liar as we have ever had in the State Department.   
 ________________________
Go to this Judicial Watch site,  for the PDF record of the questions and Hillary's answer:  

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/HRC-Responses-01363.pdf