AOL's Supreme Court review on immigration is problemate and we know why:

 AOL's Supreme Court review on immigration is problemate and we know why,  but first,  words from the far Left review of today's Supreme Court decision or lack thereof (as AOL sees the issue):


Immigration advocates on both sides of the debate stressed that the court case leaves the broad dynamics of the 2016 election unchanged. The court, split 4-4 in part because of the GOP blockade against Obama nominee Merrick Garland, did not set any new precedent that would prevent the next White House from issuing new executive orders or trying to implement Obama's again. They only permitted a lower court to block Obama's DAPA program and an expansion of DACA. That means the final decision still hinges on whichever justice — if any — the next president manages to appoint.

Source:  http://www.aol.com/article/2016/06/23/how-the-supreme-court-punted-immigration-to-the-next-president/21400984/

Editor's notes:  What the geniuses at AOL fail to understand is this:  the High Court did not "kick the can down the road."  Not at all.  Rather,  it returned the appellate decision back to that court.  When and if this case returns to the Supreme Court,  it will not be the same case.  Instead,  it will have gone through a process that restates or rewrites the case for Constitutional governance.  The Appellate Court will make a "new" judgement based on that process.  Let's not forget that the Obama Administration lied to the Appellate Court.  That is more the reason for its (the appellate court) decision than even the facts of the case.  

Obama was told to stop importing illegals until the Appellate Court made its final decision.  Instead,  the Administration imported another 100,000 illegal in defiance of the Appellate Court's demands.  That is why we are here   . . . . . .   Obama's lawless administration is the reason this case has to be revisited.