A weather alarmist challenges the editor (that would be me).

I found this. Wanted to know how you will spin this little fact ~ Anonymous.

The global average temperatures over land areas only from January to October suggest that 2015 is also set to be one of the warmest years on record over land. South America is having its hottest year on record, as is Asia (similar to 2007), and Africa and Europe their second hottest.
According to preliminary figures as of the end of September 2015, 2011-15 was the world’s warmest five-year period on record, at about 0.57°C (1.01°F) above the average for the standard 1961-90 reference period. It was the warmest five-year period on record for Asia, Europe, South America and Oceania, and for North America. WMO compiled the five-year analysis because it provides a longer-term climate signal than the annual report.

 http://www.wmo.int/media/content/wmo-2015-likely-be-warmest-record-2011-2015-warmest-five-year-period

_____________________

I will respond in due time   . . . .   maybe after Turkey Day.  Until then,  I will leave my readers with this comment or question:  Which regions in Asia,  Africa, South America North America and Europe experienced record heat.  If I can find a region (preferably several/many)  in these given continents that were reasonable normal, average, or even cooler,  I will have disproven the articles theme.

Should be fairly easy to do.  If I can't,  I will gladly admit it.  
at

9 comments:

  1. AnonymousNovember 25, 2015 at 5:36 PM

    Your research and subsequent admission will be very interesting. You sir, are a very skilled deceiver and, if you think I will let you continue to run from the truth, you are very very wrong , I have been reading this blog for years. Some of it is quite interesting, but, your weather related denials are maddening. Let's see if you dare to continue this debate. Have a happy holiday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. John SmithsonNovember 25, 2015 at 9:42 PM

      This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. John SmithsonNovember 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM

      I left an initial response to the above, but it is gone. Maybe I did not publish it. I do know, that this blog was shut down back in December of 2009, with all my autographs gone, ala communist style domestic event.

      At any rate, I will answer the above in due time, perhaps after Turkey Day. I will leave the reader with this: Is it the claim that all of Europe., all of South America, all of Africa, etc, were over heated? Were there no regions that experienced average temps or cooler temps? If so, "global" is a misnomer.

      This will be a part of my response. But there is more. Stay tuned.

      Delete
  2. AnonymousNovember 25, 2015 at 11:57 PM

    How can you debate someone who gets his info from Breitbart and places like Anthony Watt? They often highlight one errant, renegade idiot 'scientist' who is often an elderly 'professor emeritus type' that has no clue. That constitutes 'proof' for Smithson. You can't can't argue with that level of flawed critical thinking. This is an individual who doesn't understand basic evolution of mammals. He is a bonefide science denier.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. John SmithsonNovember 26, 2015 at 12:33 AM

      "Renegade" ??? Funny, that is Obama's Secret Service name from himself. What you cannot debate is the data. Tones of actual data. Please tell the readership why the Statue of Liberty is no closer to being under water, than 40 years ago. Go ahead. We would all love to know. Or maybe, explain why the year following Katrina was not record year for hurricanes, as predicted by the weather models of the warming "the sky is falling" alarmists.

      Delete
    2. AnonymousNovember 26, 2015 at 6:52 AM

      Yes, Bill O'Reilly... we know why the tides go in and out.

      Delete
    3. John SmithsonNovember 26, 2015 at 9:37 AM

      And while you are answering questions that totally defeat the Warmist's point of view, please tell us what your "O'Reilly" comment has t do with anything. And, btw, O'Reilly and Shep Smith are the two Fox hosts I no longer listen to . . . . can't stand their arrogant ignorance.

      Delete
    4. AnonymousNovember 26, 2015 at 1:32 PM

      The O'Reilly comment is characteristic of science deniers/ creationists who don't have the intellect to understand the science and instead, point to ridiculous and and supernatural explanations. This makes up most of today's Republicans.

      Climate change, like evolution, is not a 'point of view' .... it is a scientific reality. Either accept reality or be a reality denier - which shows you are ignorant and have a significant lack of critical thinking at best, or, a mental illness at worst.

      On this Thanksgiving, we wish to thank evolution and animal husbandry for turning some species of dinosaur into a ball of meat with a tiny head.

      Delete
    5. John SmithsonNovember 27, 2015 at 12:54 AM

      You mention an O'Reilly comment as being typical to science deniers. Exactly what O'Reilly comment were you talking about, since "O'Reilly" was never ,mentioned by me nor does that name appear in the poster proper. In other words, WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT. You are the one who injected "O'Reilly" into these comments, not me. Stop it.

      Secondly, it is not "evolution" but the "theory of evolution," and., as such, it is a point of view. All of the "big bang" theory is philosophical; none of it is scientific. Science is about test tubes, experiments, laboratory observations, record history, even ancient history.

      When a bone is found and identified, that is science. When we try to give an explanation as to how it came to be where we found it, that is theory.

      When men want ot women, that is not science. Rather, it is the abdication of all that is scientific. So take your "science denier" crap and preach it to people who are not thinking.

      Delete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)