We discuss the "why" to H Obama's preposterous lies told in the Australian presser, on Saturday.

Editor's notes:  In a story carried by World Net Daily, here,  and posted on the Left leaning news portal,  Memeorandum,  we have the charge of "sociopathic" leveled against H Obama by Rush.  Most would expect Rush Limbaugh to say such things about Obama.  My question is this:  is "sociopathic" just name calling on the part of the iconic radio host,  or is there reality to the label?  

Personally,  I do not believe "sociopathic" is the word best describing what we are watching in the life of H Obama.  That word has this definition:  

1. a person with a personality disorder manifesting itself in extreme antisocial attitudes and behavior and a lack of conscience.

Lack of conscious?  Yes.  Antisocial?  Maybe.  

Speaking as a family counselor, I believe the word that catches Obama's reality is "pathological" as in "pathological liar."  


Understand what a pathological liar is. Basically, a pathological liar is someone who tells lies habitually, chronically and compulsively. It has simply become a way of life for this person, to make up things for a variety of reasons and eventually, the truth becomes uncomfortable while weaving whoppers feels right to them. This kind of lying tends to develop early on in life, often as a response to difficult home or school situations that seemed to resolve better if the child lied. It's a bad habit, not a manipulative trait––this is how to differentiate a pathological liar from a sociopath who does seek to manipulate.  (Source:  http://www.wikihow.com/Spot-a-Pathological-Liar)

Obama,  at a presser on Saturday,  in Australia,  lied his backside off,  something he does on a more-than-regular basis,  and he does so for no good reason.  Read the account,  below,  and think about Obama's response.  Does anyone believe that he was totally in the dark about the Gruber story?  I mean,  it has been the lede story for a week or more.  During the same period of time,  Obama's Fallup rating has reached a new low of 37% approval  . . . .  in part because of the Gruber revelations.  So,  why this obvious lie?  It is Obama's way of saying,  "This story is unimportant to me,"  so he wants us to believe that he is not even following the story.  But that was not the only lie.  He followed this up with pretending that Gruber was unknown to Obama.  The man was not a part of the Obama staff,  or so Obama claims.  H Obama's point?  He wants us to believe that this is all news to him,  that Professor Gruber was not even a part of Obama's staff.  Problem:  staff or not,  Gruber visited the WH 19 times, that we can prove,  and sat in a planning session with three other financial advisers and Obama.  We have H Obama,  Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid,  on video,  touting the expertise of Dr. Gruber, by name and proudly so.  

In the same presser,  H Obama goes on to argue that the ObamaCare process was open and honest,  fully transparent in spite of the fact that no one read the bill before its passage.  In fact,  only 2700 pages of this bill was voted on.  Since its passage,  another 20,000 have been added to the text of this bill.  So,  of course,  there was no transparency.  Again,  the damn thing was even written at the time of its signing.  

So why the lies?  Well, if "pathological" applies,  lying is a learned trait,  a default response used to end the debate.  And,  it works for Obama.  Who stands up and challenge him beyond the "first question?"  No one.  With the lie,  Obama silences those who do not have the courage and/or the facts at hand,  to pursue the discussion.
____________________

From WND:  President Barack Obama was scorched Monday as a “sociopathic” liar and “lying con man” by radio host Rush for denying he misled the American public to get his signature health-care plan known as Obamacare passed.

During a news conference in Brisbane, Australia, Obama was asked by reporter Ed Henry of Fox News: “At your Burma townhall a couple of days ago, you tried to inspire young leaders by saying, ‘governments need to be held accountable, need to be responsive to the people.’ I wonder how you square that with your former adviser, Jonathan Gruber claiming you were not transparent about the health law because in his words the American people, the voters are stupid. Did you mislead Americans about the taxes, about keeping your plan in order to get the bill passed?”

“No, I did not,” Obama responded. “I just heard about this. I get well-briefed before I come out here. The fact that some adviser who never worked on our staff expressed an opinion that I completely disagree with in terms of the voters, is no reflection on the actual process that was run.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/11/limbaugh-unloads-obama-is-a-sociopathic-liar/#TbJK0ayIIDoEEZcR.99