WASHINGTON (AP) — The Internal Revenue Service
inappropriately flagged conservative political groups for additional reviews
during the 2012 election to see if they were violating their tax-exempt status,
a top IRS official said Friday. Organizations
were singled out because they included the words "tea party" or
"patriot" in their applications for tax-exempt status, said Lois
Lerner, who heads the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt groups. In some cases, groups were asked for their list
of donors, which violates IRS policy in most cases, she said. "That was wrong. That was absolutely
incorrect, it was insensitive and it was inappropriate. That's not how we go
about selecting cases for further review," Lerner said at a conference sponsored by the
American Bar Association. . . . . . Lerner said the practice was initiated by
low-level workers in Cincinnati and was not motivated by political bias. After
her talk, she told The AP that no high level IRS officials knew about the
practice.
Note: understand that
approximately 300 conservative teaparty
type organizations were targeted,
nationwide, a fact that, in and of itself, refutes the notion that this was anything
other than an established policy of the IRS in the weeks and months leading up
to the 2012 elections. -- blog editor
(AP) IRS Commissioner
Douglas Shulman told Congress in March 2012 that the IRS was not targeting
groups based on their political views.
Editor's Note: as it turns
out, this was a lie. It is simply not credible to target 300
teaparty and “patriot” organizations without that being for political
purposes. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the House investigative committee overseeing
governmental affairs, said "the
fact that Americans were targeted by the IRS because of their political beliefs
is unconscionable." There is speculation that, in time,
there will be further investigations into this, if not in the House, then in the Senate.
While AP did the reporting, the American Center for Law and Justice, a conservative watchdog firm headed by Jay Sekulow did "the dirty" of funding and pushing forward with the legal challenges.
No comments:
Post a Comment