Editor’s notes: this excerpt [below] says it all. It includes the cooling facts of supposed “crisis warming trends,” as well the belief that what warming trends there are, do little but increase the growing season, a major plus for the starving nations of this world.
Truth be told, cooling trends began 20 years ago, (see the article, here). There are a number of media reports confirming this trend, yet, the fear mongers continue with their mantra, while the general public continues to play its games and ignore all of the debate. Understand that the reporting on this issue comes from the liberal "Reuters." Nothing "conservative select" in this post. In fact, there is a more damaging article found in the DailyMail.co.uk under this headline:
Global warming stopped
16 years ago, reveals Met Office report quietly released... and here is the
chart to prove it
(Reuters - April 16) - Scientists are struggling to
explain a slowdown in climate change that has exposed gaps in their
understanding and defies a rise in global greenhouse gas emissions.
Often focused on century-long trends, most
climate models failed to predict that the temperature rise would slow, starting
around 2000. Scientists are now intent on figuring out the causes and
determining whether the respite will be brief or a more lasting phenomenon. [understand that "brief" is the term best used to describe the warming push, something that was not hinted at before the 1980's - blog editor].
Getting this right is essential for the short
and long-term planning of governments and businesses ranging from energy to construction, from agriculture to
insurance. Many scientists say they expect a revival of warming in coming
years. [But they offer no modeling, no evidence of any kind for this conclusion - blog editor]
Theories for the pause include that deep
oceans have taken up more heat with the result that the surface is cooler than
expected, that industrial pollution in Asia or clouds are blocking the sun, or
that greenhouse gases trap less heat than previously believed.
The change may be a result of an observed
decline in heat-trapping water vapor in the high atmosphere, for unknown
reasons. It could be a combination of factors or some as yet unknown natural
variations, scientists say.
[Funny but the article does not mention Occam's razor and the simplest reason for the problem, namely that these alarmists are wrong - editor.]
. . . . . . . . . . "The climate system is not quite so
simple as people thought," said Bjorn Lomborg, a Danish statistician and
author of "The Skeptical Environmentalist" who estimates that
moderate warming will be beneficial for crop growth and human health.
Some experts say their trust in climate
science has declined because of the many uncertainties. The UN's
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) had to correct a 2007 report
that exaggerated the pace of melt of the Himalayan glaciers and wrongly said
they could all vanish by 2035.
"My own confidence in the data has gone
down in the past five years," said Richard Tol, an expert in climate
change and professor of economics at the University
of Sussex in England . (read the full article, here).
Both Lloyd and Rose that Smithson quotes have been debunked thoroughly.
ReplyDeleteHimalayan glaciers have almost minimal affect of sea level rise. On the other hand, Greenland glaciers have a huge affect. The Ilulissat Glacier in Greenland has retreated and thinned more in the last 10 years than in the 100 yrs previous to 2001.
See the Nat'l Geographic Documentary, "Chasing Ice" - the most indepth study of glaciers to date.
http://tvblogs.nationalgeographic.com/2013/04/18/acclaimed-documentary-chasing-ice-to-make-television-debut/