Bush forced to cancel plans to avoid being arrested - and Obama does what about the situation???

Bush threatened with arrest; an action that would be considered an act of war against the United States. Disagree? Well, that makes you somewhat of a traitor, doesn't it.

Our buds [just kidding] over at the far Left site, Salon, think they are really onto something when reporting that Bush's February 12th speech " . . . . . at the Switzerland-based United Israel Appeal later this week has been canceled after several human rights groups called for Swiss authorities to arrest Bush and investigate him for authorizing torture. Bush has traveled widely since leaving office, but not to Europe, where there is a strong tradition of international prosecutions." READ MORE HERE >>>>>>

This is what is happening outside the boundaries of our country. The Salon article goes on to say that " . . . . Amnesty International and the Center for Constitutional Rights argued that Switzerland, as a party to the UN Convention against Torture, is obligated to investigate Bush for potential prosecution."

It is our opinion the Center for Constitutional Rights has nothing whatsoever to do with the Constitution and everything to do with the One World United Nations document known as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. here

Understand that the Left will say and do anything to advance its agenda. It will lie in the name of advancing truth and justice. It will pretend to be what it is not. It will and does move secretly to destroy counter movements to One World Governance. This is a perfect example. Combining the US Constitution, the exclusive rule of governance for the sovereign United States of America, with the One World United Nations and its ruling document, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the One World Leftists hope to appeal to the free people of the United States as they participate in the continuing evolution of a One World Government.

Don't believe me? Maybe you should try doing a little research while it still matters. For starters, go to this quasi-official site dealing with the United Nations Human Rights System.

You will find quotes from this site most interesting :

The United Nations (UN) has created a global structure for protecting human rights, based largely on its Charter, non-binding declarations, legally binding treaties and on various activities aimed at advancing democracy and human rights throughout the world. Of course it is "non binding." That's why they were going to arrest President Bush. That's why the Salon article mentions the " . . . strong tradition of international prosecutions." Non-binding my buttocks.

One of the six major bodies identified as making up the United Nations is the International Court of Justice (ICJ). It supposedly has "jurisdiction" over sovereign states such our country, and " . . . . is the latest step in the continuing evolution of international courts." (cf. hrea.or under the heading International Court of Justice. Note the phrase, ". . . continuing evolution of international courts.") Don't believe in a conspiracy to One World Governance? You are completely out of touch with reality.

Is the conspiracy we allude to well organized and complicated in its organization? No. The United Nations gives the One Worlders a format of sorts for their activities. But not all of United Nation membership is a part of the One World collusion. Take Venezuela, for instance. Is Hugo Chavez for One World Governance? Of course not. He is the sovereign ruler of Venezuela. Ditto for Castro in Cuba or Putin in Russia or Libya's Muammar Gaddafi. But what about the ideologues in the Neatherlands? Or Switzerland ? Or Obama and his fundamentally transformed America? Understand this: there is no greater lie told by Obama than the one in which he states, "I am no ideologue." He is clearly in his element, or so he thinks, when he travels to Copenhagen for a world conference on global warming or when he submits a report that binds this country to UN scrutiny.

Dictators and despots have their own agenda. Ideologues have a very different agenda. Often and for a time, they have the same enemies, but they are not about the same goals and international aspirations. Gaddafi is not a One Worlder. Obama is.

His submission to the United Nations, in compliance with its Universal Periodic Review of human rights of member states, is proof of his One World intentions. He has taken the sovereign United States of America and -- with this report -- placed it under the review of the United Nations. You should read the 29 page submission, most of it written in the words of Barack Obama. You can find the PDF document here. When you finish reading this document, prepared and written by/under the supervision of B Obama, you will understand why many of us are so alarmed.

Understand that when he made this submission (he is the first president of the United States to render such a report -- cf this summary report by the AP), he aligned himself with those who would challenge the sovereignty of this country and arrest one of its presidents. This is your president.

Understand that if Bush were arrested and prosecuted, Obama would do nothing but watch and make excuses.

Also understand, that an arrest of George Bush would be an act of war.

Point of post: to document the collusion of international opinion against the United States and B Obama's complicity in that reality.
m