Like Radical Islam, Radical Journalism (MSNBC) is taking a serious hit, while Fox News flourishes.

Earlier this month, Ronan Farrow's show (MSNBC)  hit a new low in the 25-54 demo ratings with just 11,000 viewers. During the same hour, Fox led with 202K and CNN had 154K. Even Al Jazeera America topped MSNBC with 22K." http://bit.ly/1z5gxRf

Editor's note:  Say "good bye" to Frank Sinatra's son.  Think about it:  11,000 people is a very small town,  and that was MSNBC's target audience last week,  with Farrow at the helm.  

Even Obama does not watch this network,  anymore.  

Its a rap !! Fox hooks more evening viewers than the other three cable networks combined.

65 share

Key to reading the numbers:  Fox and Friends at "203" had 2.03 million viewers while CNN's New Day hooked 1.14 million and Morning Joe came in with 990,000.  What is surprising to me,  is how good O'Reilly, Kelly and Hannity are doing,  each with well over 3 million viewers, and Hannity beating out Kelly for the #2 spot on Fox Primetime.  Two/three months ago,  Hannity was running under 2 million  . . . . . .  and,  Greta's numbers are on the rise.

Also,  Rachel Maddow caught 1.44 million viewers and finished second to the uneducated football player/political expert,  Ed Schulz  (I believe he was named after a horse  -  not sure as to which end of the horse,  however) and was "destroyed" by the Kelly Files,  on Fox.  Maddox has a PhD.  in Philosophy and talks like she majored in minors, as well.  Schultz is a collegiate flunky (seriously) and Megyn Kelly holds a JD degree (law's "PhD") and was in private practice for 9 years.  Maddow has been an academic her entire adult life and has no practical experience in domestic concerns.

On average, 3.4 million folks watch Fox Primetime, more than the other three networks combined.

Andrea Mitchell, married to Allen Greenspan, and her MSNBC stooge, laugh at Romney - but don't get the last laugh.

Here is MSNBC's edit.  It is obviously intentional and childish.  To think that MSNBC thinks it can still get away with such nonsense,  it startling. 

First the perversion and, secondly,  the larger context.

Context

We learn something about Rachel Maddow we really did not want to know.

Christine O'Donnell's 1996 Anti-Masturbation Campaign On MTV's ‘Sex In The 90s’ (VIDEO) — Christine O'Donnell won the Republican nomination for senator in Delaware tonight, and Rachel Maddow wasted no time showing the footage she obtained of O'Donnell's 1996 appearance on MTV's “Sex In The 90s” TV show. . . . .

Editor's notes: this story was brought to light by the butch newscaster (did I get this wrong?), Rachel Maddow at MSNBC. The video included in this story is one of a very young Christine O'Donnell making application of matters of faith she embraced at the time. Does the Maddow babe think that O'Donnell might seek to legislate her religious opinion on this point? Does Maddow think that such private activity is not considered a problem by millions of men and women who, themselves, over indulge in this practice?

What is not considered by Maddow, one who has no moral limits in mind except her own personal preferences, is that millions of folks see this as a PERSONAL problem. O'Donnell is making an appeal to the Lordship of Christ in the life of the believer. We do not expect Maddow to understand that concept and her implied ridicule of O'Donnell should be rejected for that very reason.

Apparently, Rachel Maddow does not think one can over indulge masturbation. With that in mind, we wonder where she finds time to write news script. -- jds
.