From the Washington
Times:
The
ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee took the Obama
administration to task Friday for its “irresponsible” plan to allow as many as
100,000 Haitians to immigrate to the U.S. without a visa.
Sen.
Chuck Grassley of Iowa said the administration’s
Haitian Family Reunification Parole Program — which will allow thousands of
Haitians awaiting a U.S.
visa to enter the country and legally apply for work permits — is “an
irresponsible overreach of the executive branch’s authority.”
“Which
countries are next on President Obama’s list?” Mr. Grassley said. “Will there
by medical screenings before entry? Will work permits be granted automatically?
How will this affect American workers?”
Editor’s
notes: In view of the undeniable fact
that beneficent care can be extended to the Haitian community, following the hurricane of yesterday, without violating US visa law or legal application
for work permits, is more proof of Obama’s disdain for Federal law and
order.
But, I think there is much more to this circumstance than most observers understand. It is
clear to me, that H Obama considers his
presidency as a demand extending the privileges and wealth of this nation to
others in the world. While that point of view is hardly unique, the larger reality might be much more profound than the simplistic desire to redistribute American wealth.
His campaign speech in Germany (2008), as if they were part of Obama’s new world order, his Cairo speech, his dismissal of the close ties our nation has had with Great Britain and Israel, his pledge to be more subservient to Putin (I will be more flexible after the [2012] elections), his perpetual defense of Islam, a more pronounced defense than we see coming from any member of Islam – almost as if he was a closet Muslim, his commitment of thousands of American troops into Africa coupled with his refusal to vanquish ISIS, and, his decision to allow Iran its entry into the nuclear community, all force us to the conclusion, that he is an Universalist in the Utopian sense of the word.
His campaign speech in Germany (2008), as if they were part of Obama’s new world order, his Cairo speech, his dismissal of the close ties our nation has had with Great Britain and Israel, his pledge to be more subservient to Putin (I will be more flexible after the [2012] elections), his perpetual defense of Islam, a more pronounced defense than we see coming from any member of Islam – almost as if he was a closet Muslim, his commitment of thousands of American troops into Africa coupled with his refusal to vanquish ISIS, and, his decision to allow Iran its entry into the nuclear community, all force us to the conclusion, that he is an Universalist in the Utopian sense of the word.
With all of the above in mind, I believe
he is making an existential case for remaining on the world stage, after his presidency comes to an end. Head of the UN? Chairman of the WHO? President of the IMF? With his knowledge of the inherent weaknesses
of US
law as to international “sovereignty,”
think of the damage this man could do to our national sovereignty, if he was at the center of an international
concern that could demand compliance as the world’s governance?
Never
forget that the likes of Hillary Clinton have attempted to use UN treaty
agreements to advance gun control, as they push the notion that international
treatise trumps national law. If someone
as knowledgeable of [US ] national law and as capable of raw
manipulation as is Obama, were to find
himself in the authority of the UN or related entities, the potential for overwhelming US sovereignty
would become the greatest threat to the continuation of this nation, as nothing
has, in the past.
Be aware. Be very aware !!
Be aware. Be very aware !!
No comments:
Post a Comment