28 share
strong interest
Arthur C.
Brooks, a professor at
If many
conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a
registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist
who has been mugged by data.
They include these findings:
--
Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of
conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30
percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per
year vs. $1,227).
--
Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.
--
Residents of the states that voted for John Kerry in 2004 gave smaller
percentages of their incomes to charity than did residents of states that voted
for George Bush.
-- Bush
carried 24 of the 25 states where charitable giving was above average.
-- In the
10 reddest states, in which Bush got more than 60 percent majorities, the
average percentage of personal income donated to charity was 3.5. Residents of
the bluest states, which gave Bush less than 40 percent, donated just 1.9
percent.
-- People
who reject the idea that "government has a responsibility to reduce income
inequality" give an average of four times more than people who
accept that proposition.
Brooks
demonstrates a correlation between charitable behavior and "the values
that lie beneath" liberal and conservative labels. Two influences on
charitable behavior are religion and attitudes about the proper role of
government.
The
single biggest predictor of someone's altruism, Willett says, is religion.
Smithson feels the need to post a 6 yr old article because he knows the red states, and he himself, live off of government entitlements.
ReplyDeleteSilly bit of misinformation.
DeleteBlah blah blah. That's all that I hear.
ReplyDelete