Meet Hillary's opposition and be afraid, be very afraid.

37 share
strong reader interest
<<<< Read the quote and, then,  say outloud:  "B.S."     You should know that TARP was used to reconstitute the financial coffers of Big Money to the tune of between 7 and 24 trillion dollars – all legal tender -  and Elizabeth Warren was center stage to this process as Chairman of the TARP oversight committee. 

“The way I see this, Citibank, Goldman Sachs, all those other guys on Wall Street, they’ve got plenty of folks in the United State Senate willing to work on their side.  We need more people in the U.S. Senate willing to work on the side of America’s families.”   (Quote taken from a CNN report, here).  

Editor’s notes:  I have been sounding the warning for a couple of years,  now,  and it appears,  that “now” is the time these warnings come to fruition.  Understand that Hillary is NOT the overwhelming choice of the Left,  as many would have you believe   . . . . .  not even close.  She is much more the “establishment” candidate than a flaming progressive,  and the whose on the fringe Left,  the radical/Obama-type/Marxist driven “world without borders” freak who push chaos and glory in the thought of a defeated and second rate “Unite States of America,”  know that “now” is the time for the advancement of their agenda. 

Of course,  the Obama’s have dealt The Agenda great damage,  but, still,  the Marxist Left in the Democrat Party rules the day and will not let go of their vanishing horizon without a fight.  Many in the national media,  perhaps the majority,  will side with Warren over Hillary, should there be a strong enough push to bring her – officially – into the election cycle battle. 

Physically,  she is as unattractive a candidate as lives in Marxistville.  But she is passionate in her communalism for the world, and that ideology is what the Fringe Left wants.  They had a taste of same,  with the Obama’s,  but that fantasy is long gone,  lost in a maze of party pay-backs,  corruption of the worst order,  opaqueness  never seen in our lifetimes, a pettiness that exposes the First Couple for the immature, schoolyard bullies they are,  and an ineptness for leadership that challenges our senses.  “Stupid but educated” is what many of us see. 

Warren is a fresh face,  full of classic,  Utopian rhetoric,  and willing to stand and fight for her beliefs    . . . . . . . . . . . . .   and typically deceptive in her political stance.  A perfect example is the lead-in quote (CNN) to this post,  a stated antagonism for Big Money,  combined with the fact that she is as willing to use Big Money as any politician on the stage,  today.  Understand that this woman,  the “hero of middle America,”  was the chairman of a five member committeegiven the charge of oversight for TARP.  TARP was to have been the savior of our economy,  something that had to be approved,  without delay or meaningful debate.  The Stock Market had lost 700 points in a matter of hours.  TARP was to have stopped that slide.  Turns out that in the coming four months,  the Market lost an additional 4000 points.  TARP prevented nothing,  if the publicly stated purpose is its measure.  Instead,  TARP was used to reconstitute the financial coffers of Big Money to the tune of between 7 and 24 trillion dollars – all legal tender -  and Elizabeth Warren was center stage to this process as Chairman of the TARP oversight committee. 

While she preaches one thing,  she understands the realities of Big Money and the hold it has on all political persuasions  . . . .  including a well capitalized Marxism.  And,  she is much more the ideologue than Obama.   At the same time,  she is a Fairness Utopian,  and suffers from many of the same, utilitarian  failings as the Obama’s.     In the end,  Utopian political fantasies (including Marxism) simply do not work,  that is what I mean by "utilitarian failings."   

It is a vibrant and well ordered military coupled with a strong diplomatic process, that keeps us free.  It is Big Money that oils the wheels of venture capitalism.  It is personal responsibility and vocational education (whether scholastic or blue collar vocational)  that equips the middle class to experience and participate in this thing we call “upward mobility,”  and Warren is on record,  opposing much of this.  

The next two years will produce a number of surprising new faces to the political event,  coming our way.  Warren will be one of those newbies,  and a serious threat to our free republic,  at that.  

4 comments:

  1. Warren is unelectable, smart Dems know this. Big money will always have power over anyone in the white house. Just like christianity, it's a test for the office. A candidate that doesn't support big $, doesn't make it.

    Obama is in the pocket of big money like they all were. The recovery is going well, the DOW is over 17K, far more growth than during Bush.

    My retirement funds look great, doing much better under Obama than Bush. Let's hope SS will be around in 15 yrs, I somehow doubt it will.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The retirement of some, under Bush, was fine. They pulled out early in 2008. My mother-in-law lost $65,000 of her retirement from the end of 2008 through 2009. In fact, she just got notice that her fund will close in the coming weeks. We all have our stories and perspectives.

      And the Dow? Let's see what happens to the Dow, after Yellen shuts off the Federal spigot of the monthly influx of $55 billion credit dollars via the easing programs of the recent past. Everyone I know, understands that the Market has been investing the Easing money flowing its way. Of course the Welfare Market we know as Wall Street, has grown. Did the Easing strategy work? Time will tell, and in short order. Keep in mind that unemployment, during Bush, average 4.7% including 2008, and posted a record 52 consecutive months of GDP growth, a national record and the active workforce had 6 million more Americans in it, working, than does Obama.

      Delete
    2. "The retirement funding for some . . . " was what I was trying to say.

      Delete
    3. Re Warren: I believe she is her own worst enemy. I know that many voters care only about a comfortable "survival." Feed them, take care of their rent or housing, pay for the heatlh care, abort their unwanted children, etc., and they will vote for whoever makes such promises. But I do believe that many, and I hope most, understand that her specific arguments simply do not work. She is an open borders politician, or so I think she is. If that is true, it is becoming clear that such a point of view does not work. Just one example, I am sure, with many more to come.

      Delete