65 share
The Washington Beacon gives us this: 
Referring to the administration, one Democrat
said to Politico: “I wouldn’t be surprised if they looked at the next three
years and think, ‘Oh my God, how are we going to survive the next 36 months of
this bullshit?” Good question—one the president seems intent on answering by
not caring, by retreating into his comfy and unthreatening cocoon of affluent
bourgeois liberals from around the world. The rest of us have to live with the
consequences.
Editor's notes: Nothing makes my point about the disaster Obama has been to the Democrat Party than the statement above, and the continuing photo idiocy of this president. The picture is a frame taken from a "secretly filmed" video of an Obama workout. Of course, we all know that this video was no secret, or it would have been taken down within minutes of its publishing. It wasn't. Why? Because this clown thinks working out with weights best suited for a woman, is "cool."
Geeeeesh.
Making fun of a man being secretly filmed for one reason, and one reason only, to make fun of and publically ridicule him. I would love to see your fat ass in a gym, OLD man. Obama is twice the man you ever were or could want to be.
ReplyDeleteObama is in Europe, on a hotel floor that is reserved for him and his people ONLY. There is no one in this gym room other than his own people, no one. The fact that this video is still around, is proof that it was filmed on purpose. And why? He wanted to send a message to macho man Putin. Kind of silly and those who look on, know it. As far as his manhood versus mine, well, I am fine with who I am, your childish comments to the side.
ReplyDeleteSmithson is so fat he thinks riding a big hog motorcycle is "exercise".... he can't even do that.. laid it down, wrecked it. lol
ReplyDeleteAnd this is important, why? Proud of the fact that I my weight is down 80 pounds over the past three years to a respectable 255. Ride one of those man bikes, for a change, and you will know just how much work, one is. But, once again, even on the most mundane of issues, you have no clue.
DeleteThe fact remains, that our "president" is a freaking embarrassment at every level.
Get a clue... 255 is still clinically OBESE. Holy shit, you were 325? OMG, morbidly obese.
DeleteConservatives are the most obese Americans and the biggest drag on our health care system.
My doctors tell me I should weigh 220 per my bone structure. Indeed, I was morbidly obese several years ago, but today, I am a little heavy for my size (keep in mind I was 6'4" before my operation - now I am just 5'7"). BTW, my over-wight condition cost the taxpayer exactly NOTHING, so get a grip. I have gone from a 56 pant to a 44 soooo, "clinically obese" does not describe me. Thanks for your concern.
DeleteI am 5'7" an internationally elite athlete at age 54, and I weigh 143 lbs. I'm sure you have had a difficult experience with any surgery that caused you to lose so much height, but no one 5'7" could claim 220 lbs as a 'healthy weight'
DeleteRight, and you have a PhD, to boot. Seriously, that was the advice of my doctor . . . . . 200 to 220, not a pound below those limits. Like I said, I wear a 44 pant - hardly an obese size and still leg press 1000 pounts (I do 25 reps at 750 ), so stop trying to put me in your Hubba the Hut world. You have seen my pictures. Look Obese to you?
DeleteElite international athlete? What is your sport? I coached freestyle wrestling for 33 years and have 16 state champs to brag about. Had a blast coaching. Coached school boy wrestling 8 different years, and won 4 city titles as well.
Presently, I'm ranked #6 in the world as a 400m sprinter age group 50-54... look it up. I weigh 143 lbs and my waist is 29", same as when I graduated high school. If people as adults are really fit and healthy, there is no reason they shouldn't weigh a healthy weight or what they did when they were 19. 44 waist is obese.
DeleteAnd yes, a PhD.
You need to get over the notion that you know more than me, about my health and weight. 220 is a healthy weight for me. If you think I am lying about medical opinion on that point, nothing I can do to change your mind. Sounds to me, that you are a bit on the under-nourished side of the health spectrum.
DeleteI will check out your ranking. Very good.
Good to finally meet you, William.
Track and Field as well as wrestling were my sports of choice,
Nice to meet you, sorry if I sounded insulting.
DeleteYou are in your early 50's, and I am 69, almost old enough to be your dad (please don't get sick, on me). The most significant difference between the two of us, philosophically speaking, is found in the difference between modernity and post-modernism. My generation and those that preceded me, believe in what I call "the larger narratives" (the Bible, the Constitution and Constitutional law, the prevenient presence of God, Jesus, George Washington, etc) while your generation tends to not care about these larger dialogues at all. "Xer's" (and you are more an "Xer" than a Boomer - per your age) prefer the more anecdotal "smaller narratives." While Utopian goals are a big deal with your generation, and comprehensive, at that, they have no foundation in the larger narratives. Without, and in contrast to, those "larger narratives," post-modern folks are trying to establish their brand of (utopian) world order without the benefit of accepted tradition and historicity . . . . . much as our founders did, so many years ago. Our Founders were "liberals" back in the day. They rejected the world view of their times, and invented their own alternative. BECAUSE they worked outside the "system," they made a lot of mistakes in their pursuit of a very different political/world view. They were inventing their own polemic and debating issues based on personal preferences (the "smaller narratives," if you will). But all "movements" become institutionalized, laying wait for the next generation of reforms. Smaller narratives always become larger narratives, given the passing of time. But I have folks calling me, so I will have to continue this, later. Suffice it to say, our differences are more generational than grounded in "right and wrong." Later days.
DeleteI have 7 children. All of them are either Xers or Millennial. One is a business owner, the others are nurses, teachers, a doctor and a lawyer. The whole famn damily is highly educated. And our discussions are intense and extremely challenging. The ONLY reason each is not a flaming utopian liberal is because of me and the respect they have for me. And, that is what is missing ("respect") in most political discussions. Without it, there is no coming together.
I think the thing that keeps my kids open to what I have to say, besides the fact that I am good at defending what I believe (doesn't make me right, but it does make me "formidable"), is the fact I have bucked the religious system in which I was raised. Four point "0" and class president in seminary, but was rejected by that school, six weeks before graduation, solely based on what I believed, as a member of my particular denomination. I lost my degree, had two kids at the time, and simply could not "reboot" and start over with my education . . . . . . but I did not run from my evangelical roots. You don't know the guy, but Karl Barth (pronounced "Bart"), is my theological/literary mentor. Never met the guy, but, I am one of the few who actually understands the man. Evangelicalism cannot be changed or amended by those who stand "across the street" and make fun of "them." So I stayed,
Have incoming calls I have to deal with, so later, if interested, with my discussion. Just know, that our differences are much more generational than based in what is "right or wrong."
Delete