By way of a
reminder, hurricane Sandy hit the New
York/New Jersey coast on October 29/30.
It caused 70 billion dollars in damages and killed 125 people.
Fox News reports that Obama addressed the nation from FEMA
headquarters in Washington on Nov. 3, promising to cut red tape and bring the
full force of FEMA to hard-hit residents.
"What I told the governors and the mayors is what I've
been saying to my team since the start of this event, and that is we don't have
any patience for bureaucracy, we don't have any patience for red tape, and we
want to make sure that we are figuring out a way to get to yes, as opposed to
no, when it comes to these problems," Obama said.
Three days later,
after appearing more “presidential” than at any time in his first four
years, he won the national election for
his second term.
15% of those surveyed in exit polling, on November 6th, said that his appearance at
the scene of the disaster, his buddy
hug from the fat governor of New
Jersey, his willingness to be on the
ground, walking and talking with those
who were in the wake of the storm, was a
primary influence in their vote for his second term. 
__________________
Sidebar: not all is lost. Consider Ramsussen's conclusion:
Among non-Democrats, however, attitudes towards socialism
are very different. Republicans and Independents are overwhelmingly opposed to
socialism, and as Rasmussen has concluded, just 24
percent of all Americans have a favourable opinion of socialism, with 67
percent holding an unfavorable view of a socialist economic system. According
to Rasmussen, 68
percent of Americans hold a favourable view of “capitalism,” and 76 percent
have a positive view of the “free enterprise system.” This chimes with a January
Rasmussen poll, which found that 70 percent of Americans “think a free
market economy is better than one managed by the government.” A separate Rasmussen
poll released on Tuesday also revealed a deep-seated suspicion of the
federal government among a clear majority of Americans, with 63 percent
offering a negative view. __________________
While
Bush 43 did incredible harm to the private sector economy, Obama is the first presidential candidate to
deliberately tap into the feeding trough and ask for their votes. In many respects, Bush 43 was no less “big
government” than Obama. The difference is found in the fact that
Obama sees no value in fiscal restraint as he seeks to grow social dependency
on the Federal Government. The
difference is found in the fact that Obama has no regard for private sector
partnerships and people of faith. The difference is found in
Obama’s arrogant disregard for civility and bi-partisanship.
Understand that since [at least] 1998, Obama has had it in his head “ . . . to build a majority coalition of dependence
on the state. [see the Obama video at Rush Limbaugh.com].
Point of post: you
can expect all future elections to center around issues of centralized
dependency and fiscal irresponsibility.
The hope of winning elections,
for conservatives, lies in the
latter of the two considerations.
Centralized planners are not responsible fiscal types, and,
from time to time, this comes
back to haunt them. With all the talk of the "fiscal cliff," we may be at that
point, now, despite the recent election
results.
Text: Fox News/ Midknight Review.
No comments:
Post a Comment