Obama, the hero of the Far Left and One Worlders, has hit another snag in the implimentation of ObamaCare.

 <<<<  Actually,  nothing about this motto is true;  neither the "one" nation part,  or the "under God" part. But there is hope,  if nothing more.

 It took the Dems a full year to write and pass ObamaCare,  and the funny part of this is the fact that there was no legislative opposition.  It took the geniuses in the Socialist Democrat Party  a year to pass a bill when they,  the Dems,  were the only game in town. Since then,  they lost a very important battle in the Supreme Court,  one that allowed the individual states the right of refusal as regards the individual Medicare exchanges;  the national opinion has never favored the healthcare reform, something that continues to be the case,  to this day.  And now,  we have this temporary (?) set back via a Federal court judgment: 

We know several things about the fellow we call "Barack Hussein Obama."  One of the two or three most profoundly consistent revelations about this imposter,   is his  penchant for saying whatever needs to be said at the moment,  to get his way or win the point.  He is wholly unwilling to keep his word or obey a law that works against his personal agenda.  I could cite hundreds of instances in “proving” my point,  but you will just have to trust me for all those instances save this one:  when Obama met with Catholic leadership regarding their concerns over  the rule of conscience versus his contraception/abortion  nonsense,  he promised that the problem would be solved in short order,  that he would “accommodate” their faith concerns. 

Of course,  no one who knows him,  believed a word he said on this matter,  and now,  that circle of “unbelievers” includes a Federal judge.  

According to reporting found in the Washington Examiner, 

Judge Brian Cogan mocked the “accommodation” on religion liberty outlined by President Obama in regards to his health care law’s contraception mandate while ruling against a Justice Department motion to dismiss the Archdiocese of New York’s lawsuit against the regulation.

“There is no, ‘Trust us, changes are coming’ clause in the Constitution,” Cogan wrote in his ruling against DOJ. “To the contrary, the Bill of Rights itself, and the First Amendment in particular, reflect a degree of skepticism towards governmental self-restraint and self-correction.”

Cogan was referring to the fact that Obama’s promise to accommodate the concerns of religiously-affiliated institutions that would have provide free contraception. . . . . . The judge in this case acknowledged both the non-existence of the so-called accommodation as well as the injury the mandate is already and will continue to inflict on these charitable institutions. 

The judge has put a hold on the implementation of this part of ObamaCare,  until a higher court sorts through the matter and makes a decision. 

Read the full report here,  at the Washington Examiner.  

All that talk about a "new" Obama,  one who would be more inclined to bi-partisanship and diplomacy in his second and final term,  turns out to be so much rhetorical crap.  Fortunately for the Patriot Nation,  the court system has not been completely overrun with those who no longer consider the Constitution a guide for governance.