We already have free and affordable health care in Title X. So why the current debate? We have the answer.

In a Midknight Review post three weeks ago,  we pointed to Rick Santorum's hypocrisy in his criticism of Mitt Romney's stand on abortion. As it turns out,  Santorum had voted (on several occasions) to fund Planned Parenthood and the several contraption aids offered in a 1970's piece of legislation called Title X.   Here is a brief summary of Title X as seen through the eyes of the far far Left,  The Huffington Post: 

The Title X family planning program was enacted by President Nixon in 1970 to fund a range of preventive health care services free of charge to patients at or below the poverty level. For low- to moderate-income patients, there is a sliding fee scale for access to Title X services, which include breast and pelvic exams, Pap smears and other cancer screenings, HIV testing, pregnancy testing and counseling, and affordable birth control.

Question:  with Title X in place for the past 42 years,  it is clear that the Socialist Totalitarian  Democrats ("STD's" for short) has:


A.  Make up the contraception issue since the supposed problem of free contraception was solved in 1970.  


B. If the real issue is not "contraception"  (and it cannot be),  it is clear that the current Fluke/contraception  debate is "cover" for the Administration's attack on religion.  

Obama and Company have "stepped in it" with this attack.  They have taken a matter of conscience,  resolved 220 years ago,  and have decided that - during an election cycle - they would force religious institutions to violate their centuries old conscientious objection(s) to birth control in their effort to sequester issues of faith from the larger political narrative.  


We got off track with all this,  when Rick Santorum stupidly took the bait and ran with his social purity campaign.  Understand that I am a social conservative.  But this year's campaign is not about social issues.  The Administration wants it to be because it dare not run on its record.  This years campaign is about one thing and one thing, only  --  getting rid of this Administration and every vestige of its existence. 


Understand that we are not talking about getting rid of "big government" liberalism.  We have had that conflict from the very beginning of the American Experiment.  Many of the "signers" of our Constitution were "big government" folks.  Barack Obama is not a "big government" type in the typical sense of the word.  His is a radicalized black reformer who believes the Constitution is a white man's document, that its time has come and gone,  that a borderless and one world economy is the wave of the future,  and that he has a central role to play in fundamental transformation from the traditions and history of the past to the strange world that exists within the thinking of this revolutionary pin head.  Don't agree?  Alright,  then tell me what the following quote has to do with anything other than our claim in this post.  

May of 2008:

MICHELLE OBAMA: "Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our conversation; we're going to have to change our traditions, our history; we're going to have to move into a different place as a nation."

While you are at it,  explain the term "fundamental transformation of the United States of America" to this fine audience.  I believe that one cannot use that phrase without implying radicalized change.  I believe that the rhetorical logistics of it all demands a "radical" interpretation of that campaign promise.