Obama's foreign policy record, his strongest point? Let's see . . . . . he killed some terrorists and then fled the region; that's about it, right?

It's a little disgusting. When Obama's minions talk about his foreign policy record, the first thing that comes to their anti-war minds, is . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . killing people and and the continuing practice of rendition (rendition: turning terrorists over to foreign entities so they can torture them) .

The man joined the hypocrites on the Left in his criticism of Bush and the practice of waterboarding. Understand that Bush waterboarded three people, three of the most morally bankrupt people in the world, by the way . . . . . waterboarded them under medical supervision . . . . they all lived . . . . . . and stopped with the practice four years before Obama "banned" the interrogation process. After "taking the high road," Obama, then developed the policy of "death by drone," killing terrorist from 5,000 feet up with the pilots working their joy sticks somewhere here in the states, killing terrorists and all the folks living in the immediate area -- like next door.

That was more humane than waterbaording?

Since Obama has taken office, we have not collected any viable information regarding terrorism, world wide, via interrogation. We have them, but we have not interrogated them. If we had not killed Osama bin Laden and captured his computerized files and hand written documents, we would have no new information, at all. In fact, Obama took the responsibility of interrogating terrorists away from teh CIA, where it belongs, and gave it to the FBI, which has not "high valued interrogation units," as promised by Obama more than two years ago.

Conclusion: killing a few terrorist does not a vibrant foreign policy make. . . . . . . period.