Midknight Review -- new and revised: There are thousands of conservative voices severely limited as of the Fall of 2018. Our "audience" was cut from 10,000 a day to 200 via a Google "adjustment" in its algorithms. For a brief period of time, you could not find this blog on any sarch engine. Its all about 2020, folks and the Bastards are cheating like Hell to end Trump's national return to law ad order.

There are thousands of conservative voices severely limited as of the Fall of 2018. Our "audience" was cut from 10,000 a day to 200 via a Google "adjustment" in its algorithms. For a brief period of time, you could not find this blog on any sarch engine. Its all about 2020, folks and the Bastards are cheating like Hell to end Trump's national return to law ad order.

The Daily Caller News Foundation sent Google a list of questions in advance of its exclusive report, which revealed the discussion about suppressing right-of-center articles as a response to President Donald Trump’s election.
Google issued a statement for that story, in which the company denied ever manipulating search results for political purposes.
Google’s statement did not answer four specific questions from TheDCNF, and a Google spokeswoman declined a follow-up request for answers to those questions, which are posted below:

Is Google aware of other instances in which employees advocated for suppressing The Daily Caller or Breitbart?
[Google engineer Scott] Byer wrote in his post: “Let’s make sure that we reverse things in four years.” He seems to indicate that Google employees should take actions to make sure Donald Trump doesn’t win re-election in 2020. Is that a use of official Google communications that the company approves of?
Have other Google VPs been part of internal conversations about potentially suppressing conservative media outlets, or just [engineering vice president David] Besbris?
Previous reporting by the Wall Street Journal demonstrated that Google employees brainstormed ways to manipulate search results in response to President Trump’s travel ban. Can Google guarantee that there won’t be a third example of Google employees seeking to manipulate search functions for anti-Trump purposes?

8 comments:

AnonymousDecember 5, 2018 at 6:26 AM
Trump committed felony witness tampering in plain sight yesterday.
ReplyDelete
Replies
John SmithsonDecember 5, 2018 at 6:28 AM
You are the only nutcase making such a claim. There will be no criminal indictment and the House cannot prosecute an impeachment . . . it can only recommend one.
ReplyDelete
Replies
AnonymousDecember 5, 2018 at 11:56 AM
"You are the only nutcase making such a claim."

https://www.lawfareblog.com/donald-trumps-tweet-about-roger-stone-witness-tampering

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/419454-conways-husband-suggests-trump-is-tampering-with-witnesses

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-12-03/trump-tweets-look-a-lot-like-witness-tampering

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/12/03/trumps-latest-tweets-cross-clear-lines-experts-say-obstruction-justice-witness-tampering/

https://abovethelaw.com/2018/12/donald-trump-is-witness-tampering-again/
ReplyDelete
Replies
AnonymousDecember 5, 2018 at 11:16 PM
Bad news for Trump. Flynn would only have gotten off by giving someone up above him. Trump and Pence.
ReplyDelete
Replies
John SmithsonDecember 6, 2018 at 8:10 AM
So why hasn't Mueller indicted someone, anyone, for collusion or obstruction. the way you think, Trump came to the election with 20 men and women willing to betray their country in a grand plot with Putin at the center, giving orders. Do you not understand how stupid that idea is?
ReplyDelete
Replies
AnonymousDecember 7, 2018 at 11:19 AM
Because he's playing a masterful game of legal chess. He already has sealed indictments of Trump's family and probably Trump himself, he is not going to reveal them until he's ready to take Trump down. If he indicts Trump Jr. Trump will try to fire him.
ReplyDelete
Replies

Add comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Let's return the favor, shall we?

CLINTON: You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about. That’s why I believe if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and/or the senate, that’s when civility can start again. But until then, the only thing that the Republicans seem to recognize and respect is strength. And you heard how the Republican members led by Mitch McConnell, the president really demeaned the confirmation process.

The Stated Nonsense from the Left now includes these Progressive goals:

July 2, 2008, Obama had this to say: "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

MICHELLE OBAMA: "Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our conversation; we're going to have to change our traditions, our history; we're going to have to move into a different place as a nation."

“ . . . . . . they have become a generation of activists possessed with that most American of ideas – that people who love their country can change it.” -- Obama the Radical

On September 30, Van Jones told MSNBC "I think everybody should hold onto your seats. October is going to be the turning point when it comes to the progressive fight back."