If you know nothing about waging war, you must understand that "compromise" with an enemy power is tantamount to "surrender." The two are identical in terms of affect. Beginning with the Bush 43 presidency, the Left chose the path of all out war, refusing to compromise (in a legislative sense) on much of anything offered by Bush and his conservative/elitist cabal.
Barack, a foreign agent in his own right, saw this change in emphasis and based his entire presidency on that fact. He dedicated himself to taking down the major accomplishes of the Bush era, i.e. the missile defense systems in Alaska, the coal mining contracts of the central/northern states, the missile defense systems/treatises Bush signed with Georgia and The New Czech Republic, the peace in Iraq, private sector capitalism as a path to fiscal recovery, a move to a borderless national community, a tax on the middle class (ObamaCare) that was defended before the Supreme Court as a tax, not as a healthcare system, a decision on his part to fund Iran as the chief provider of Middle East terror, a failed war in Afghanistan, funding for every Middle East terror organization at war with Israel, cooperation with every radical anti law and order entity on the domestic scene (the New Black Panthers, the Nation of Islam, the Muslim Brotherhood, and Al Sharpton's "iggnet' following, to name a few).
He moved the nation closer to his socialist and pagan ideals, but failed to close the deal. His decision to govern as if he was a dictator was rejected in 2010 with a huge victory for conservative influences. In 2012, Barack's winning campaign for re-election fell 3.5 million votes short of his 2008 totals, and in 2014, his policies were roundly rejected in the most one sided midterm since reconstruction (1865). Finally, his appointed successor, Hillary "I stand by my man" Clinton was defeated by an impossible candidate --- another referendum against Obama.
Realizing that the Dems are anti-God, anti-capitalism, anti-private gun and property ownership (oh yes they are), anti-Flag and National Anthem, it is little wonder they are losing the national battle. Clearly they have decided that they can no longer compromise. Their decision to make up the Russian Agent nonsense, is a clear declaration that they, as a political party, have nothing to offer in terms of substantive discussion, and, now, prefer to be known simply as the "resistence."
The media has completely abdicated its responsibility as a free and non-partisan agent for democracy, no more useful to the cause of freedom than nat's bad breath. Our media, 90% of it, exists only as an agent of European/godless socialism.
Compromise with entities that embrace all of the above, is nothing short of surrender. To loose to the Democrat Party is to loose this nation.
No comments:
Post a Comment