Remember when the Boston Globe charged that Nunes got his "information" about Obama surveillance of Trump from two insiders within the Trump White House?
Turns out this was not true at all. Instead, Nunes has not identified his sources, but has denied that his information came from White House staff (as if this would have been a grievous error). In fact, he knew about these documents before Trump took the oath. At that time, he only knew that the Obama folks had acquired and leaked incidental information. It was only this past week, that he was given a supervised viewing. After the viewing, he said, "It was far worse than he thought."
My question is this: Who cares about when he got what he got? The more important news maker, here, is this: He is in possession of dozens of individual docs that were mined by Obama subservients, whose contents were released to the media, a felonious event, and whose content is not directly related to the claim of Russian collusion. We are talking about hard evidence of Obama's surveillance of Donald Trump.
Hopefully, in short order these docs will be released to the public. Adam Schiff, the minority co-chair of the House committee has seen these docs, but, has remained silent as to their content. His silence, however, gives us reason to believe in Devon Nunes' characterization of the documents. Looks like we have a smoking gun.
Now you know.
No comments:
Post a Comment