As relates to gun control issues, the Obama/Hillary Left wants you to believe they are only concerned for more security checks, qualifying those who apply for gun ownership. That is a lie. Their intentions are singular and profoundly unpopular. They intend to negate the 2nd Amendment in its totality, via International Treaty (the U.N.). Why have we seen article after Left Wing article, concluding that International United Nations Treatise supersede American law? The strategy is this: support the U.N.'s eventual ban on private gun ownership as they insist that such a treatise pushes national law to the side.
HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL Vol. 58
In the United States, the application and interpretation of international
treaty obligations implicate an intricate interplay with Constitutional mandates
and federal statutes.
4
As a matter of domestic law, the Constitution trumps
treaties.
5
However, the same may not be true of other sources of law. Although
not free from scholarly debate,acts of Congress remain on a par with treaties,
prevailing over inconsistent treaty provisions only pursuant to either (i) the
“later in time” rule or (ii) an explicit congressional pronouncement.
8
According to rules of international law, however, neither a Constitutional
mandate nor the enactment of a statute provide an excuse for a treaty
violation. Prevailing opinion holds that an act wrongful under the law of
nations remains so even if a nation’s internal law deems otherwise
Source: PDF - Treaty Obligations and National Law: Emerging Conflicts in International ArbitrationClearly, legal opinions written by members of the International community are at various with sovereignty issues of the United States of America.
Conclusion: Trump is dead right when it comes to his claims that Hillary intends to abolish gun ownership. Don't be tricked into asking if she believes in the 2nd Amendment. Rather, ask her if she believes that International Law trumps the U.S. Constitution.
No comments:
Post a Comment