Mission Statement: This blog reviews the news of the day in light of 242 years of American history. "Nationalism," a modern day pejorative, has been our country's politic throughout history, until 2008. Obama changed that narrative. Trump is seeking a return to our historical roots. Midknight Review supports this return to normality.
Climate Hustle, first of its kinds, is a new movie destined to be a classic in the Warming debate. Here are some details of its release:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Christina Norman (651) 724-4228; cwilson@cfact.org
Skeptical Climate Documentary Set to Rock Climate Debate
President Obama & World Leaders to Be Greeted By New Film Debuting in Paris
Gala Paris red carpet premiere for new “Climate Hustle” skeptical documentary
Cinéma du Panthéon, December 7, 7:30 PM
(Sorbonne, Paris) CFACT will hold the world premiere of its long-awaited Climate Hustle skeptical documentary film at an invitation-only red carpet event in Paris during the UN’s COP 21 international summit on climate change.
Featuring interviews and comments from more than 30 renowned scientists and climate experts, Climate Hustle lays out compelling evidence that devastates the global warming scare. Film host Marc Morano, founder and publisher of CFACT’s award-winning Climate Depot news and information service, leads viewers on a fact-finding and often times hilarious journey through the propaganda-laced world of “climate change” claims.
The film is the first climate documentary to profile scientists who have reversed their views from supporting the so-called “consensus” position to a conversion to skepticism. The film also profiles politically left scientists who have now declared themselves skeptics of man-made global warming.
David Rothbard, CFACT president and executive producer of the film says, “Climate Hustle is the most important climate documentary since Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth. Gore’s film kicked off a decade of scaremongering junk science. CFACT’s film debunks the scare and clears the way for a return to sound science and rational debate.”
Nationally syndicated columnist Cal Thomas calls Climate Hustle “tremendous” and says “anyone who still believes in ‘climate change’ after watching this film needs the type of reprogramming given to cult members.”
Noted climatologist Dr. Judith Curry of the Georgia Institute of Technology, who is featured in the film, adds “Climate Hustle is a refreshing and entertaining antidote to the sillier and alarming claims about climate change and its impacts that people regularly hear from politicians and the media.”
“Climate Hustle” will premiere at the Cinéma du Panthéon, beside the Sorbonne, on Monday, December 7. A red-carpet ceremony and champagne reception will take place at 7:30 p.m. prior to the screening. The film is planned for theatrical and home video release in 2016.
Because of very limited space, credentialed media that wish to attend the event should RSVP in advance to Christina Norman of CFACT (cwilson@cfact.org or phone (651) 724-4228). Climate Hustle’s host, Marc Morano, along with key scientists from the film, will be available for a short time on the red carpet prior to the event at 7 p.m. and are also available for interviews and comments upon request.
Climate Hustle, a production of CFACT, was fully funded by the support of roughly 1,500 citizen supporters. More information is available at www.ClimateHustle.com/press
Text above from Climate Depot, here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CFACT is not a scientific organization. It is a conservative anti-environmental group. Yes, this is typical. A conservative policy agenda group recruits one or two scientists and make a propaganda film ... and the weak minded idiots eat it up. Not for people with brains ... sorry.
ReplyDelete"In 1985, the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) was founded to promote a positive voice on environment and development issues. Its co-founders, David Rothbard and Craig Rucker, believed very strongly that the power of the market combined with the applications of safe technologies could offer humanity practical solutions to many of the world’s pressing concerns. A number of leading scientists, academics, and policy leaders would also agree with them and soon joined their effort, along with thousands of citizens from around the country
DeleteDavid Rothbard - only has a Bachelor of Arts degree
DeleteCraig Rucker - Masters in Public Administration
Committee For a Constructive Tomorrow has received funding from ExxonMobil, Chevron, other industry policy think tanks.
Yea, get your science from these guys.
There are dozens of climate scientists associated with CFACT. Secondly certainly a college graduate can read and understand satellite data and the any number of critical articles on the subject of fearmongering and climate alarmism. Third, not a single leader in the Democrat party has an ounce of college education specific to the climate debate. In other words, not one of the blowhards in your party is as qualified any number of folks in CFACT. In fact, you are no more qualified to speak on the subject, if specific education is required. Fourth, Chevron has as much a right to tell us what they are doing to help cut emission and add balance to the on going debate. Your president nor Tom Steyer or Alvin Gore or George Soros or Gates have any background to what they say about the weather. In fact, Obama did so poorly in school, that he has hidden his transcripts . . . . even his high school transcripts . . . . from the world. Finally, you still cannot explain to the readership why Hawaii and the Statue of Liberty are not ALREADY under water. The latest "we are all going to die" climate prediction has the oceans rising 10 feet by 2050. 2006 (the year following Katrina) was going to be the worst year from storm weather in the history of mankind . . . . . not one severe storm hit the US that year. Gore's prediction of 20 foot of water in downtown Manhattan by 2015 would have seen the Eastern seaboard as we know it, completely under water . . . . . not even close. Understand that if the oceans are "going to rise," they are already on the rise and have been for decades, Right? Wrong and laughably so.
DeleteThe few contrarian scientists usually fit a pattern. Look at Ivar Giaever, 86 yrs old, his Nobel Prize awarded 42 yrs ago in a field not related to climatology. Giaever is currently a science advisor at The Heartland Institute - one of the leading industry funded denialist organizations. His statement that "the global mean has not risen in 19 years" is contradicted by the NOAA data set that shows the top ten warmest years 1880-2014 ALL occurring since 1998. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201413
ReplyDeletehttp://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/7/nobel-physicist-obama-dead-wrong-global-warming/?page=all
"usually . . a pattern (?)" If it is "usually" a pattern, its not a pattern at all. Secondly, A "warmest year" is a year with a .02 degree of temperature rise. The fact of the matter is this, the rise of temp averages is so minor as to allow for a nominally level record over the 1992- Present in spite of the supposed fact, per your reference, above, that CO2 emissions continue to rise at a rate inconsistent (far faster) with the nearly flat-line rise of "global" warming.
DeleteFinally, there is no such thing as "global" warming . . . . . its all regional, and you know it.
NASA study showing climate contrarian studies are flawed. Article shows how media that this blog cites, like the Daily Express and Daily Mail, and science denial blogs badly misrepresented their study results, as happens all too often.
ReplyDeleteScience prevails. Deniers wrong again.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2016/jan/12/nasa-study-fixes-error-in-low-contrarian-climate-sensitivity-estimates
I do not quote any of those media sources except to give credit to them for publishing RSS/satellite data. I get all my facts from government approved sources.
Delete