"Obama is going to close and get rid of GITMO !!" Our response? Duh !!


<<<  GITMO has been leased to the US since 1903.  By the time our Resident Muslim Sympathizer gets out of office,  he will have released and made rock-stars of more than 330 killers who fight in the name of Islam.  

WASHINGTON, July 22 (Reuters) – The White House said on Wednesday that the Obama administration is in the final stages of drafting a plan to close the U.S. prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Editor's notes:  This is not news.  Midknight Review has been predicting the release of all prisoners and the the granting of GITMO property and facilities back to Cuba,  for years,  now.  If the media turns this into some sort of surprise news item,  either they have not been doing their homework over the years,  or they are just trying to sell this as news.  

The fact that Obama claims GITMO to be a motivation for ISIS is total nonsense compared to him killing bin Laden,  him killing around 80 Taliban leaders,  him killing 7,000 Muslim non-targets (bystanders) in his drone war.  GITMO is hardly mentioned in enemy propaganda.  In fact,  the simple existence of the U.S. and Israel are all the motivation the Muslim radicals need to carry on their endless war.   
 _________________________

When it comes to radical Muslim terrorists, three words liberals would never use in the same sentence, the left feels sympathy.  Leftists believe that radical Islam has legitimate grievances.  We did, after all, invade Afghanistan, even though we did it because we were attacked by radical Muslims who were trained there.  We did, after all, invade Iraq, even though we did it to rid the world of a brutal dictator, Saddam Hussein, and his stockpile of weapons of mass destruction (of which we found the chemical weapons).  We were attacked on 9/11, but leftists will tell you smugly that we had a history of supporting Arab dictators against the popular will of the Arab people.  Liberals won't tell you that the deaths of 3,000 Americans was justified by our foreign policy, but they will be the first to tell you that there was an explanation for it, that we made the Arab world "angry" because we had diplomatic relations and even gave economic aid to governments the radical Muslims disapproved of.  (A footnote: the radical Muslims have no problems with dictatorships, as long as they are in charge of them.)



No comments:

Post a Comment