Midknight Review -- new and revised: Two things wrong, here: Kerry/Obama are NOT working for a binding agreement with Iran (their words); and, this, then, is their excuse from not taking it to Congress. If its not binding, why does Congress need to review and approve? What a joke.

Two things wrong, here: Kerry/Obama are NOT working for a binding agreement with Iran (their words); and, this, then, is their excuse from not taking it to Congress. If its not binding, why does Congress need to review and approve? What a joke.

Question: How can Obama claim that he is solving a problem while negotiating a 10 year moratorium against weaponizing Iran, while, at the same time, working for a deal that "is not binding?" There is simply no logical path from these two points, published by the Administration, to Kerry's statement, "Because of this deal, Iran will not get a nuclear bomb, period."

2 comments:

AnonymousMarch 17, 2015 at 12:06 PM
In case you missed it
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/16/opinion/paul-krugman-israels-gilded-age.html
ReplyDelete
Replies
John SmithsonMarch 17, 2015 at 3:28 PM
Nothing Krugman has to say is of import to America, and certainly not here. But you already know what I think of this sissy-man. Obama is pro-Iran, in every way. That is what I know. That is what I can prove. Even if liberal, why on earth would you argue the point?
ReplyDelete
Replies

Add comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Let's return the favor, shall we?

CLINTON: You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about. That’s why I believe if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and/or the senate, that’s when civility can start again. But until then, the only thing that the Republicans seem to recognize and respect is strength. And you heard how the Republican members led by Mitch McConnell, the president really demeaned the confirmation process.

The Stated Nonsense from the Left now includes these Progressive goals:

July 2, 2008, Obama had this to say: "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

MICHELLE OBAMA: "Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our conversation; we're going to have to change our traditions, our history; we're going to have to move into a different place as a nation."

“ . . . . . . they have become a generation of activists possessed with that most American of ideas – that people who love their country can change it.” -- Obama the Radical

On September 30, Van Jones told MSNBC "I think everybody should hold onto your seats. October is going to be the turning point when it comes to the progressive fight back."