In the spirit of changing policy here at Midknight Review, we have this reader comment.

Editor's notes:  I do not know if this is a cut and paste,  but it came from "Bill,"  "A.M."  a return reader (?) to this blog,  and an opponent to the bias of Midknight Review.  I decided to post this "comment" as an "article,"  because I do believe it is worth sharing.  

Note to all:  This is the second "comment" posted as an "article."  I hope this will be a continuing policy,  for Midkinght Review.   Please include your first name,  in the text of your "comments" if you want to remain "anonymous" as an observer.  I will not post trash talk.  Your comments must be reasonably substantial as to content,  but not necessarily inline with my politics.  Avoid the feeling of "entitlement" as you write.  This is a conservative blog and will remain such  . . . . . . .   but I have come to believe that we all need to "lighten up" in our discourse    . . . . . . . . .   excluding my commentary on Obama,  of course.  I believe he is no friend of this country,  but I don't have to indict all who disagree.  Capesh?   

Updated note:  the conservative reader needs to witness the broad-brush accusations that abound in liberal speak,  not to mention their total disregard for accuracy in framing the debate and its conservative opponents.  This would have been a much better piece,  if its author had not over-hyped the Christian Right's sense of "panic."  As far as the changing demographics of this nation,  so beit.  
 
 ******
 There’s been a lot of media attention recently to the changing demographics of the United States, where, at current rates, people who identify as “white” are expected to become a minority by the year 2050. But in many ways, the shift in national demographics has been accelerated beyond even that. New data from the American Values Atlas shows that while white people continue to be the majority in all but 4 states in the country, white Christians are the minority in a whopping 19 states. And, nationwide, Americans who identify as Protestant are now in the minority for the first time ever, clocking in at a mere 47 percent of Americans and falling.

The most obvious reason for this change is growing racial diversity. Most Americans still identify as Christian, but “Christian” is a group that is less white and less Protestant than it has been at any time in history. The massive growth in Hispanic Catholics, in particular, has been a major factor in this shift in the ethnic and religious identity of this country. White Catholics used to outnumber Hispanic Catholics 3 to 1 in the 2000s, but now it’s only by a 2 to 1 margin.

But another major reason religious diversity is outpacing the growth of racial/ethnic diversity is largely due to the explosive growth in non-belief among Americans. One in five Americans now identifies as religiously unaffiliated. In 13 states, the “nones” are the largest religious group. Non-religious people now equal Catholics in number, and their proportion is likely to grow dramatically, as young people are by far the most non-religious group in the country. This isn’t some kind of side effect of their youth, either. As Adam Lee has noted, the millennial generation is becoming less religious as they age.

These changes explain the modern political landscape as well as any economic indicator. While not all white Christians are conservative, these changing numbers definitely suggest that conservative Christians are rapidly losing their grip on power. And while some non-white Christians are conservative, their numbers are not making up for what the Christian right is losing. And whether conservative leaders are aware of the exact numbers or not, it’s clear that they sense that change is in the air. Just by speaking to young people, turning on your TV, or reading the Internet, you can sense the way the country is lurching away from conservative Christian values and towards a more liberal, secular outlook. And conservative Christians aren’t taking these changes well at all.


(cont)

To look at the Christian right now is to see a people who know they are losing power and are desperately trying to reassert dominance before it’s lost altogether. The most obvious example of this is the frenzy of anti-abortion activity in recent years. Anti-choice forces have controlled the Republican Party since the late ’70s, but only in the past few years have they concentrated so singlemindedly on trying to destroy legal abortion in wide swaths of the country. In 2011 alone, states passed nearly three times as many abortion restrictions as they had in any previous year.

None of this is a reaction to any changes in people’s sexual behavior or reproductive choices. It’s not like there was a spike in abortions causing this panic. In fact, the abortion rate has been declining. And despite continuing media panic over adolescent sexuality, the fact is that teenagers are waiting longer to have sex, on average, than in the past. Despite this, not only are you seeing a dramatic increase in attacks on legal abortion, the Christian right has expanded its attacks to contraception access, suggesting that something has worked them into a panic they believe can only be resolved by trying to reassert their religious and sexual values. (see my "comments" below).

That something isn’t changes in sexual behavior, but it’s reasonable to believe it’s because of changes in sexual values. People might not be having more sex, but they are feeling less guilty about the sex they are having. Since Gallup first started polling people in 2001 on moral views, acceptance of consensual sex between adults has skyrocketed. In a decade’s time, acceptance of premarital sex swelled from 53% to 66% of Americans and acceptance of gay Americans grew from a mere 38% to a majority of Americans. Even polyamory has become more acceptable for Americans, rising from being accepted by 5% of Americans to 14%.

The fact that these changes in attitude are rising alongside the growth of irreligiosity is not a coincidence. More perhaps even than the 1960s, Americans are in a period of questioning rigid sexual and religious mores, and concluding, in increasing numbers, that they are not down with guilt-tripping people for victimless behavior and demanding conformity for its own sake. Some of them–now a whopping 22% of Americans!–are leaving religion entirely. Some are continuing in their faith but choosing to interpret their values differently than Christian conservatives would like.

And so we see Christian conservatives cracking down in a desperate bid to regain control. They claim that they’re being oppressed by increasing tolerance for religious diversity. They have latched onto, with some success, the claim that “religious freedom” requires giving Christians the right to oppress others. The Republican Party is in complete thrall to the religious right, to the point where giving the Christian right one go-nowhere symbolic bill instead of another one created a major political crisis.

The irony is that this panic-based overreach is just making the situation worse for the Christian right. One of the biggest reasons the secularization trend has accelerated in recent years is that young people see the victim complex and the sex policing of the Christian right and it’s turning them off. And they’re not just rejecting conservative Christianity but the entire idea of organized religion altogether. In other words, the past few years have created a self-perpetuating cycle: Christian conservatives, in a panic over changing demographics, start cracking down. In reaction, more people give up on religion. That causes the Christian right to panic more and crack down more. In the end, Christian conservatives are going to hasten their own demise by trying to save themselves. Not that any of us should be crying for them. -AM 

6 comments:

  1. A.M. writes: the Christian right has expanded its attacks to contraception access, suggesting that something has worked them into a panic they believe can only be resolved by trying to reassert their religious and sexual values.

    No attacks on contraception, here. BUT, neither do I want to pay for your sexual choices. Want guys like me "out of your bedroom?" Stop asking me to pay for sexual fun. Also, "Christian right" is far too broad a term. I see not uptick in efforts to curb or abolish the killing of the unborn. What has happened, however, is this: those on the Right who fight this fight, have learned the value of incrementalism. 10 years ago, it was all or nothing, for the anti-abortion crowd, and they wound up with nothing. Today, we understand that, for the time being, abortion is reality - but late-term abortions are very unpopular (80% oppose), and health regulations applied to abortion mills is a necessity. If a clinic cannot afford health standards, they should not be in business.

    A.M. - "And so we see Christian conservatives cracking down in a desperate bid to regain control." Aga in, no panic, and absolutely no effort at control, unless you think saving the lives of the unborn is your implied reality for your use of the term "control.' Does the reader know what happens to an unborn, during an abortion? Good grief! "They" literally pull the baby apart, with no regard for the pain caused or the sheer Hitler-esk process. And we Christians "are the wacko's." Pathetic.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for putting this out there. You should also copy and past this month's cover story from National Geographic. It is excellent and covers the present trend in America on science denial.
    http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2015/03/science-doubters/achenbach-text

    I think it's especially pertinent in this age where American kids aren't even in the top 20 among nations in math and science.
    http://www.cnycentral.com/news/story.aspx?id=978874#.VQnJIGTF8z4

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I posted the article because we all need exposure to opposing opinions. You first link, above (national geographic) begins with this : "Why Do Many Reasonable People Doubt Science?
      We live in an age when all manner of scientific knowledge—from climate change to vaccinations—faces furious opposition. Some even have doubts about the moon landing."

      You should admit to the notion of "reasonable people." Further, you, with your advanced college education, should be the first to admit that science is seldom "final," that is never wrong to question authority. What one does with their questioning makes the difference between anarchy and confident direction. But I will leave this to further discussion. Again, reasonable people ask questions and demand satisfaction in the offering of proof or evidence. This blog is not part of the science denying community. In fact, I don't anyone who is. But, neither do I accept science as infallible or results that are nothing more than philosophical "solutions."

      The big bang is an example of the latter. There is not "test tube" proof of a "big bang." Without a creator, the big bang is a philosophical necessity. It is no more provable than the existence of God. The difference between you and me is this: I believe in the eternity of God and you believe in the eternity of matter. So we choose what we will believe. As I have said, often, faith precedes knowledge.

      Delete
    2. Some consider the infinite universe as 'God,' something greater, unknowable, and certainly beyond any childish concept man could conceive - including the Big Bang which new research is showing that is unlikely a singular or unique event. Pretending our man made religious ideas have any relationship to the creation of the universe is immature and arrogant.

      http://www.isciencetimes.com/articles/6651/20140109/universe-measured-perfect-accuracy-infinite-flat-eternal.htm

      Delete
    3. I believe in a God who is self revealing. Nothing immature about that. It is called "faith." A postulate is an unprovable axiom that is used to further science. We use it only because it (the postulate) works, not because we can explain why it works. Ditto God.

      Delete
    4. Science appeals to our rational brain, but our beliefs are motivated largely by emotion, and the biggest motivation is remaining tight with our peers. Religion and politics are the greatest examples of this ... the need to conform with the beliefs of your peers... like the religious right, the professional industry funded science deniers and the like.

      Delete