<< Its not just the Fat Man; rather, it is the whole world of the Marxist driven Utopian Progressive that is falling apart. Me? I am loving it.
For those who visit this rather awesome blog, here is an account of a failing Al Gore. The point(s) of this article are important, in view that some have challenged my characterization of Gore and his message. In particular, the an idiot's claim that Gore predicted 20 foot of water in New York by 2015 coupled with the fact that for a time, he was the accepted face of the Alarmist Movement is implicitly confirmed in this article.
In a piece published in The Daily Caller, Myron Ebell, CEI’s Director of Global Warming and International Policy, provided a firsthand account of the opening speech for the Lima Climate Change Conference given by “former star of stage and screen” Al Gore. According to climate-change skeptic Ebell, the performance was unconvincing at best, consisting mostly of an oldies but goodies review of debunked claims.The Inconvenient Truther started 15 minutes late due to low turnout, spoke to a half-empty room, and spent most of the time rehashing and reframing discredited stats and apocalyptic predictions from his film, including the hockey stick chart and his heavily mocked forecast of a submerged Manhattan. Finish reading this account - Keep reading…
The worst drought in 1200 yrs in CA, followed immediately by the worst storm in more than a decade. 2014 shaping up to be the hottest on record. It's all because of Alinsky ah ....hahahaha.
ReplyDeletePersistent ignorance and denial must be embarrassing, especially to a fat man who degrades another by calling him 'fat'.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/03/world/climate-change-report/
Back on the happy weed, again? You don't think Hillary and Obama have studied Alinsky? You don't know that Hillary was an intern for Alinsky, that she wrote a college paper on the man, and Obama taught the man's rules for radicals while at Columbia? You still resist the fact that all warming trends are regional? Do you not see the difference between satellite temp information (we call this empirical evidence) and the theoretical world of weather modeling . . . . . . . . all 50, 60, or 70 of these models? Gore is a pig of a man, at any level you care to discuss and if that is unsettling to you, I really cannot help that.
Delete