Editor's notes: If you listen to these young people (video below), clearly their ideas come from the teaching staff at the Leftist schools they attend. And the comment of the young man at 51 secs into the video, demonstrates just how out of touch these young people are. "I don't think anyone would argue that . . . . . " could not be more off center from the truth of the situation. And, to think, these kids are Obama. By that, I mean to say, as a student, Obama's ideas were shaped by the same type of academic bias these kids deal with each and every day. Obama is no less out of touch with what people believe than the folks in this video . . . . . and, sadly, none of them seem to know where they are in relation to what others thinks. They believe they are at the center, when, in fact, they are the fringe.
(51 secs into video): I don't think anyone would argue that we created the problem of ISIS ourselves . . .
The polls have never supported ObamaCare, as written, but no one in leadership seems to care. Why? Have you not wondered how "they" could continue with their agenda, when that agenda is not popular? It is because the center of their universe was taught to them. Their center is an esoteric curriculum, warmed over from past Utopian efforts. The dangerous aspect of this, as applied in a free and representative society, is this: the Utopian goals of the Elitist Class, are known only by those in Academia. That is why most of the crap they come up with is such a surprise to the rest of us . . . . . the 80% who have no idea where "they" are trying to take us. All that we know for certain is this: where we are going has little to do with where we have been.
Why would a man fight a war when he does not believe in "victory?" Why would a leadership raise taxes on all of us, in the name of fairness, when this once great nation's birth mark was opposition to taxation by a former imperialist power? Why would Academia support the likes of the United Nations, when its ineptness and ties to totalitarianism are so extreme? Why would the Left deny "God" on one hand, and ignorantly quote scripture (from time to time) on the other hand? Why the thirst for absolute power in the name of "democracy?" Why the fantasy belief that pretends a government never run out of money? Why the insistence that mankind is essentially good, including those who are obviously perverted and violently evil? Why the willingness to surrender our national sovereignty to an authoritarian world order?
Why? Because their value system comes from within themselves and is anecdotal and temporal in scope and nature. As such, "their value system" involves the denial of history and the benefit of past efforts, over the centuries, of struggling constituencies striving for freedom and the right to live our lives in community without surrendering our rights to that community.
"Values," to these people, are the product of an educated and determinant class that is more concerned with their own political survival in the "here and now," than the freedom and liberties of the larger population. That is exactly why "freedom and personal liberties" are under attack, today, and undeniably so. That is why all such regimes (whether in the Marxist influenced regimes in China, the UK, the EU, Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, or any number of the authoritarian Middle Eastern and African nations), oppose the very concept of "God." Our nation is based on the belief that our unalienable rights come from God. In the confirmation hearings of Sotomayor, she admittedly had no clue as to unalienable rights coming from God. I believe at this point in her confirmation, she represented the thinking - or lack thereof - of Academia as to God and the historicity of "rights and privileges" as defined by the Founders.
Never before have we, as a free nation, had to deal with the threat of the legislative loss of free speech, property rights, the right to work, and, the right of self defense as an unified and corporate agenda of an elitist minority, but this is exactly where we are, today.
Sadly, all of the above, and more, defines the ideological battle of this day and time. It is the Patriot Nation and the concept of unalienable rights versus the likes of the Communist Manifesto and a thing called dialectical materialism. Reject "communist" if you will. But to reject the issue of "dialectical materialism" is to miss the heart and soul of the Utopian Movement. In this system of thought, godless materialism is in conflict with the "mythologies" of spiritualism, whether Christian, Judeo, oriental, personal.
Our job, as patriots, must include the fair inclusion of the values established by the Founders. Specifics change but values do not and that is what should unite and carry us all through time.
And what part of "they all blame America" did you not hear these children say? And why is it that you are afraid to actually debate the issues? And why do you libs fear (as in "panic stricken") when students are given the opportunity to compare domestic, social and spiritual considerations? I know the answer to this last question: you libs lose control of the student if he/she is allowed and encouraged to think for themselves .
ReplyDeleteInteresting debate on Muslims... when they say that there is significant % of Muslims that support violence, etc....
ReplyDeleteWhat percentage of Americans polled were for the bombing of Iraq that killed 10s of thousands?
Interesting in how the question is asked, how the answers framed. Personally, I see both sides of the argument. Especially, that most religions are divisive, unproductive to world unity and ultimately the survival of the human species.
From which Marxist blog did you get your stats on US bombing of Iraq?
ReplyDeleteI will give you this: how the question is framed is critical, but only if the polling concern is honest in its conclusions as to polling results. Also, because partisan's are often masters in the opinion industry, polls are terribly unreliable. Bush was very unpopular in 2004 but won the election with 51 points, very nearly the same percentage as Obama's second term victory. In Clinton's second term election against Dole, NBC released their poll showing Dole a 21 point underdog. He lost the election by 7.