Midknight Review -- new and revised: Obama did nothing about those 200,000 killed in Syria; did nothing about the Benghazi deaths; did nothing about the 32 Navy Seals killed in revenge for Osama bin Laden. Why should we believe he will do anything of substance in this case?

Obama did nothing about those 200,000 killed in Syria; did nothing about the Benghazi deaths; did nothing about the 32 Navy Seals killed in revenge for Osama bin Laden. Why should we believe he will do anything of substance in this case?

44 share

40 is our goal

Steven Sotloff was murdered in the same manner as James Foley. Sotloff has been in confinement with ISIS for a full year.

The Pentagon was asked, today, whether it has a strategy for dealing with ISIS and the Syrian rebel force. Answer: "Of course we do" which stands at odds with Obama's denial of a strategy. Understand that he has been given info on these murderers for well over a year.

David Haines will be victim # 3. He was forced to watch the violent death of his American friend. Haines is a Brit.

2 comments:

AnonymousSeptember 2, 2014 at 10:38 PM
You never knew what Obama was doing about bin Laden til after it was over.
ReplyDelete
Replies
John SmithsonSeptember 2, 2014 at 10:55 PM
Of course I did. He campaigned on finishing the job Bush couldn't - i.e. killing bin Laden. What difference did that death make in the fight against terror? You can't point to a single smidgen of evidence that bin Laden's death had any sort of negative impact against terror. You all whine and cry about GITMO, how that prison insights the terrorist to do more violence, but ignore Obama's drone war, in which he has killed some 60 al Qaeda leaders and another 5,000 pedestrians. You don't think that pisses off the terrorists? Answer that question, moron.

Putin is laughing at Obama. So too is ISIS, Assad, the Iranian leadership, Boko Haram, that midget moron in N Korea, and the Red Chinese. You all are a scam in American politics. There is no America if we do not perserve our military and fight evil where it lives. Or would you rather fight them as they enter your house on the hill? Which is it, Slick?
ReplyDelete
Replies

Add comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Let's return the favor, shall we?

CLINTON: You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about. That’s why I believe if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and/or the senate, that’s when civility can start again. But until then, the only thing that the Republicans seem to recognize and respect is strength. And you heard how the Republican members led by Mitch McConnell, the president really demeaned the confirmation process.

The Stated Nonsense from the Left now includes these Progressive goals:

July 2, 2008, Obama had this to say: "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

MICHELLE OBAMA: "Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our conversation; we're going to have to change our traditions, our history; we're going to have to move into a different place as a nation."

“ . . . . . . they have become a generation of activists possessed with that most American of ideas – that people who love their country can change it.” -- Obama the Radical

On September 30, Van Jones told MSNBC "I think everybody should hold onto your seats. October is going to be the turning point when it comes to the progressive fight back."