Midknight Review -- new and revised: Why Isn't the NRA Defending Ferguson's Blacks? We have the answer.

Why Isn't the NRA Defending Ferguson's Blacks? We have the answer.

47 share

40 is optimum
Strong reader interest

Cliff Schecter / The Daily Beast:
Why Isn't the NRA Defending Ferguson's Blacks?

Editor's notes: That is the question posited by the Daily Beast. Here is the answer: the NRA does not believe that guns should be used to rob and riot, period. And, there really is nothing more to say. Understand that the folks at the Daily Beast do not understand the pro-gun issue. Gun legislation should never limit the liberties of the law abiding citizen. THAT has always been the position. Always.

The rioters in Ferguson are not law abiding citizens. Case closed.

No comments:

The Stated Nonsense from the Left now includes these Progressive goals:

July 2, 2008, Obama had this to say: "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

MICHELLE OBAMA: "Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our conversation; we're going to have to change our traditions, our history; we're going to have to move into a different place as a nation."

“ . . . . . . they have become a generation of activists possessed with that most American of ideas – that people who love their country can change it.” -- Obama the Radical

On September 30, Van Jones told MSNBC "I think everybody should hold onto your seats. October is going to be the turning point when it comes to the progressive fight back."

Midknight Review -- new and revised

Why Isn't the NRA Defending Ferguson's Blacks? We have the answer.

No comments:

Post a Comment

copyright policy of the original Midknight Review